Show that the second equation in Eq. 12.127 can be expressed in terms of the field tensor Fμνas follows:

localid="1654746948628" Fμνxλ+Fνλxμ+Fλμxν=0

Short Answer

Expert verified

The second equation Gμνxν=0can be expressed in terms of field tensor as

Fμνxλ+Fνλxμ+Fλμxν=0

Step by step solution

01

Expression for Maxwell’s equation:

Write the expression for Maxwell’s equation.

Gμνxν=0

....................(1)

Iftheμ-0then,equation(1)becomes,Gονxν=G00x0+G01x1+G02x2+G03x3Gονxν=Bxx+Byy+BZzBxx+Byy+BZz=.B.B=0Ifμ=1thenequation(1)becomes,G1νxν=G10x0+G11x1+G12x2+G13x3G1νxν=-1cBxt-1cEzt+1cEyz-1cBxt-1cEzt+1cEyz=-1cBt+×E×E=-Bt

02

Show that∂Fμν∂xλ+∂Fνλ∂xμ+∂Fμν∂xν=0

Takethesumofthespatialcomponents.

Ifμ=1,v=2andλ=3,then,theequation(2)becomes,F12x3+F23x1+F31x2=Bzx2+Fxz+Fyy.B=0Ifμ=0,v=1andλ=2,thezcomponentfromequation(2)becomes,F01x2+F12x1+F30x2=Ex/cy+Bzct+Ex/cx×E=-BtIfμ=0,v=2andλ=3,thexandycomponentfromequation(2)becomes,F02x3+F23x0+F30x2=Ey/cx3+Bxct+Ez/cx2×E=-BtSo,ItcanbeseenthetthefunctionGμνxν=0canbeexpressedintermsoffieldtensorasFμνxλ+Fνλxμ+Fλμxν=0Therefore,thesecondequationGμνxν=0canbeexpressedintermsoffieldtensorasFμνxλ+Fνλxμ+Fλμxν=0

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Find the invariant product of the 4-velocity with itself, ημημ. Is localid="1654516875655" ημtimelike, spacelike, or lightlike?

The coordinates of event Aare (xA,0,0),tA, and the coordinates of event B are(xB,0,0),tA. Assuming the displacement between them is spacelike, find the velocity of the system in which they are simultaneous.

The twin paradox revisited. On their birthday, one twin gets on a moving sidewalk, which carries her out to star X at speed45c ; her twin brother stays home. When the traveling twin gets to star X, she immediately jumps onto the returning moving sidewalk and comes back to earth, again at speed 45c. She arrives on her 39th birthday (as determined by her watch).

(a) How old is her twin brother?

(b) How far away is star X? (Give your answer in light years.) Call the outbound sidewalk system S¯and the inbound oneS¯ (the earth system is S). All three systems choose their coordinates and set their master clocks such that x=x¯=x~=0,t=t¯=t~=0at the moment of departure.

(c) What are the coordinates ( x,t ) of the jump (from outbound to inbound sidewalk) in S?

(d) What are the coordinates role="math" localid="1650588001605">x¯,t¯of the jump in ?

(e) What are the coordinates role="math" localid="1650588044697">x~,t~ of the jump in ?

(f) If the traveling twin wants her watch to agree with the clock in S , how must she reset it immediately after the jump? What does her watch then read when she gets home? (This wouldn’t change her age, of course—she’s still 39—it would just make her watch agree with the standard synchronization in S.)

(g) If the traveling twin is asked the question, “How old is your brother right now?”, what is the correct reply (i) just before she makes the jump, (ii) just after she makes the jump? (Nothing dramatic happens to her brother during the split second between (i) and (ii), of course; what does change abruptly is his sister’s notion of what “right now, back home” means.)

(h) How many earth years does the return trip take? Add this to (ii) from (g) to determine how old she expects him to be at their reunion. Compare your answer to (a).

The natural relativistic generalization of the Abraham-Lorentz formula (Eq. 11.80) would seem to be

Kradμ=μ0q26Πcdαμdb

This is certainly a 4-vector, and it reduces to the Abraham-Lorentz formula in the non-relativistic limitvc .

(a) Show, nevertheless, that this is not a possible Minkowski force.

(b) Find a correction term that, when added to the right side, removes the objection you raised in (a), without affecting the 4-vector character of the formula or its non-relativistic limit.

An ideal magnetic dipole moment m is located at the origin of an inertial system S¯ that moves with speed v in the x direction with respect to inertial system S. InS¯ the vector potential is

A¯=μ04πm¯×r^¯r¯2

(Eq. 5.85), and the scalar potentialV¯ is zero.

(a) Find the scalar potential V in S.

(b) In the nonrelativistic limit, show that the scalar potential in S is that of an ideal electric dipole of magnitude

p=v×mc2

located atO¯ .

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free