(a) Show that the skin depth in a poor conductor σ<<ωεis (εσ)2μ(independent of frequency). Find the skin depth (in meters) for (pure) water. (Use the static values of ε,μand σ; your answers will be valid, then, only at relatively low frequencies.)

(b) Show that the skin depth in a good conductor (σ<<ωε)is λ2π(where λ is the wavelength in the conductor). Find the skin depth (in nanometers) for a typical metal (σ>>Ωm107-1)in the visible range (ω1015/s), assuming ε=ε0and μμ0. Why are metals opaque?

(c) Show that in a good conductor the magnetic field lags the electric field by 45°, and find the ratio of their amplitudes. For a numerical example, use the “typical metal” in part (b).

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer

(a) The skin depth in a poor conductor is d=2σεμand the skin depth for pure water is 1.19×104m.

(b) The skin depth in a god conductor is d=λ2πand the skin depth for a typical metal is 12.5nm.

(c) The ratio of the real amplitude is 1.12×10-7S/m.

Step by step solution

01

Expression for the wavenumber and relative permittivity:

Write the expression for the wavenumber for the poor conductor.

k=k+iK …… (1)

Here,Kis the imaginary part.

Write the expression for the relativity permittivity.

εr=εε0ε=εrε0 …… (2)

Here, is the Permittivity of the free space.

02

Determine the skin depth in a poor conductor and for pure water:

(a)

Write the expression for imaginary part K.

K=ωεμ21+σεω212

Solve the above expression for the poor conductor.

K=ωεμ21+12σεω2-112K=ωεμ212σεωK=σ2μμ

Write the expression for the skin depth.

d=1K

Substitute K=σ2μεin the above expression.

d=1σ2μεd=2σεμ

Substitute the value of equation (2) in the above expression.

d=2σε0εrμ

Take the value of εrfrom table 4.2 for pure water.

Substitute σ=2.5×105Ωm-1,role="math" localid="1655714742974" ε0=8.85×10-12C2/Nm2,εr=80.1and μ=4π×10-7H/min the above expression.

d=212.5×105Ωm-18.85×10-12C2/Nm280.14π×10-7H/md=1.19×104m

Therefore, the skin depth in a poor conductor is d=2σεμand the skin depth for pure water is 1.19×104m.

03

Determine the skin depth in a good conductor and for a typical metal:

(b)

Write the expression for the wavenumber for a good conductor.

k=K

Here,Kis the imaginary part.

Hence, the wavelength of the conductors will be,

λ=2πk2πK

Calculate imaginary part K for a good conductor.

K=ωεμ21+σεω2-112K=ωεμ2σεωK=ωμσ2

Hence, the skip depth in a good conductor will be,

d=1ωμσ2 …… (3)

Substitute ω=1015s-1, μ=4π×10-7H/mand σ=107Ωm-1in equation (3).

d=11015s-14π×10-7H/m107Ωm-12d=1.25×10-8m×109nm1md=12.5nm

As the fields do not penetrate far into the metal, they are opaque in nature.

Therefore, the skin depth in a god conductor is d=λ2πand the skin depth for a typical metal is 12.5nm.

04

Show that in a good conductor, the magnetic field lags the electric field by 45°:

(c)

For a good conductor:

k=K

Calculate the phase angle between the magnetic field and the dielectric field.

ϕ=tan-1Kkϕ=tan-11ϕ=45°

Take the ratio of the real amplitude of E and B.

B0E0=KωB0E0=εμ1+σεω2B0E0=εμσεωB0E0=σμω

Substitute σ=107Ωm-1, μ=4π×10-7H/mand ω=1015s-1in the above expression.

B0E0=107Ωm-14π×10-7H/m1015s-1B0E0=1.12×10-7S/m

Therefore, the ratio of the real amplitude is 1.12×10-7S/m.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question:According to Snell's law, when light passes from an optically dense medium into a less dense one the propagation vector bends away from the normal (Fig. 9.28). In particular, if the light is incident at the critical angle

θc=sin-(n2n1)

Then , and the transmitted ray just grazes the surface. If exceeds , there is no refracted ray at all, only a reflected one (this is the phenomenon of total internal reflection, on which light pipes and fiber optics are based). But the fields are not zero in medium ; what we get is a so-called evanescent wave, which is rapidly attenuated and transports no energy into medium 2.26

Figure 9.28

A quick way to construct the evanescent wave is simply to quote the results of Sect. 9.3.3, with and

kT=kTsinθTx^+cosθTz^

the only change is that

sinθT=n1n2sinθI

is now greater than, and

cosθT=1-sin2θT

is imaginary. (Obviously, can no longer be interpreted as an angle!)

(a) Show that

ET(r,t)=E0Te-kzeI(kx-ωt)

Where

kωc(n1sinθ1)2-n22

This is a wave propagating in the direction (parallel to the interface!), and attenuated in the direction.

(b) Noting that (Eq. 9.108) is now imaginary, use Eq. 9.109 to calculate theirreflection coefficient for polarization parallel to the plane of incidence. [Notice that you get reflection, which is better than at a conducting surface (see, for example, Prob. 9.22).]

(c) Do the same for polarization perpendicular to the plane of incidence (use the results of Prob. 9.17).

(d) In the case of polarization perpendicular to the plane of incidence, show that the (real) evanescent fields are

Er,t=E0e-kzcoskx-ωty^Br,t=E0ωe-kzksinkx-ωtx^+kcoskx-ωtz^

(e) Check that the fields in (d) satisfy all of Maxwell's equations (Eq. 9.67).

(f) For the fields in (d), construct the Poynting vector, and show that, on average, no energy is transmitted in the z direction.

In writing Eqs. 9.76 and 9.77, I tacitly assumed that the reflected and transmitted waves have the same polarization as the incident wave—along the x direction. Prove that this must be so. [Hint: Let the polarization vectors of the transmitted and reflected waves be

n^T=cosθTx^+sinθTy^,n^R=cosθRx^+sinθRy^prove from the boundary conditions that θT=θR=0.]

Suppose string 2 is embedded in a viscous medium (such as molasses), which imposes a drag force that is proportional to its (transverse) speed:

Fdrag=-Yftz.

(a) Derive the modified wave equation describing the motion of the string.

(b) Solve this equation, assuming the string vibrates at the incident frequency. That is, look for solutions of the form f~(z,t)=eiωtF~(z).

(c) Show that the waves are attenuated (that is, their amplitude decreases with increasing z). Find the characteristic penetration distance, at which the amplitude is of its original value, in terms of Υ,T,μand ω.

(d) If a wave of amplitude A , phase δ,= 0 and frequencyω is incident from the left (string 1), find the reflected wave’s amplitude and phase.

Consider a particle of charge q and mass m, free to move in the xyplane in response to an electromagnetic wave propagating in the z direction (Eq. 9.48—might as well set δ=0)).

(a) Ignoring the magnetic force, find the velocity of the particle, as a function of time. (Assume the average velocity is zero.)

(b) Now calculate the resulting magnetic force on the particle.

(c) Show that the (time) average magnetic force is zero.

The problem with this naive model for the pressure of light is that the velocity is 90°out of phase with the fields. For energy to be absorbed there’s got to be some resistance to the motion of the charges. Suppose we include a force of the form ymv, for some damping constant y.

(d) Repeat part (a) (ignore the exponentially damped transient). Repeat part (b), and find the average magnetic force on the particle.

A microwave antenna radiating at 10GHzis to be protected from the environment by a plastic shield of dielectric constant2.5. . What is the minimum thickness of this shielding that will allow perfect transmission (assuming normal incidence)? [Hint: Use Eq. 9.199.]

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free