lf Jf=0 everywhere, the curl of H vanishes (Eq. 6.19), and we can express H as the gradient of a scalar potential W:

H=W

According to Eq. 6.23, then,

2W=(M)

So Wobeys Poisson's equation, with M as the "source." This opens up all the machinery of Chapter 3. As an example, find the field inside a uniformly magnetized sphere (Ex. 6.1) by separation of variables.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The value of magnetic field inside a uniformly magnetized sphere by separation of variables is B=μ023M.

Step by step solution

01

Write the given data from the question.

Consider the curl of Hvanishes (Eq. 6.19), and we can express H as the gradient of a scalar potential W.

Consider Meverywhere except at the surface (r=R), so Wsatisfies Laplace's equation in the regions r<Rand r>R.

02

Determine the formula of magnetic field inside a uniformly magnetized sphere by separation of variables.

Write the formula of magnetic field inside a uniformly magnetized sphere by separation of variables.

B=μ0(H+M) …… (1)

Here, μ0 is permeability, H is gradient of scalar potential and M is magnetization.

03

Determine the value of magnetic field inside a uniformly magnetized sphere by separation of variables.

First we start with the boundary conditions for the problem.

2W=M ; H=W

Let represent the sphere's interior or exterior. For the boundary, we may take an infinitesimal line integral of length ε, and we obtain

Hdl=Wdl

Using the fact that line integral is infinitesimal and the gradient theorem

en^H=(W2W1)

In the limit ε0 we have

W1=W2

Second, we may set up a tiny Gaussian pillbox with base Aand height ε at the boundary and calculate the integral below.

(W)dr=MdrWda=MdaA(W2W1)n^=AMn^

Since M=Mz^, we have

W2r|r=RW1r|r=R=Mcosθ

Let M=Mz^be along the z axis. Due to axial (φ)symmetry, potential is given by

W=W1=l=0AlrlPl(cosθ)W2=l=0BlrllPl(cosθ)

Consider solve for Aland Blusing boundary conditions. From (1) we have

W1=W2AlR2l+1=Bl

Due to equation (2) and proportionality of Al and Bl we see that only l=1terms will survive (orthogonlity of Legendre polynomials).

2BlR3+Al=MA1=M3B1=MR33

So, we have

W=W2=M3rcosθr<RW1=MR33r2cosθr>R

For the filed inside the sphere we have

H=W=M3rcosθ=M3z^=M3;z=rcosθ

Determine the magnetic field inside a uniformly magnetized sphere by separation of variables.

Substitute23M for (H+M) into equation (1).

B=μ023M;r<R

Therefore, the value of magnetic field inside a uniformly magnetized sphere by separation of variables isB=μ023M .

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A short circular cylinder of radius and length L carries a "frozen-in" uniform magnetization M parallel to its axis. Find the bound current, and sketch the magnetic field of the cylinder. (Make three sketches: one forL>>a, one forL<<a, and one forLa.) Compare this bar magnet with the bar electret of Prob. 4.11.

A familiar toy consists of donut-shaped permanent magnets (magnetization parallel to the axis), which slide frictionlessly on a vertical rod (Fig. 6.31). Treat the magnets as dipoles, with mass md and dipole moment m.

(a) If you put two back-to-hack magnets on the rod, the upper one will "float"-the magnetic force upward balancing the gravitational force downward. At what height (z) does it float?

(b) If you now add a third magnet (parallel to the bottom one), what is the ratio of the two heights? (Determine the actual number, to three significant digits.) [Answer:(a)3μ0m2(b)0.8501]


In Prob. 6.4, you calculated the force on a dipole by "brute force." Here's a more elegant approach. First writeB(r)as a Taylor expansion about the center of the loop:

,B(r)B(r0)+[(rr0)0]B(r0)

Wherer0the position of the dipole and 0is denotes differentiation with respect tor0. Put this into the Lorentz force law (Eq. 5.16) to obtain

.F=IdI×[(r0)B(r0)]

Or, numbering the Cartesian coordinates from 1 to 3:

Fi=Ij,k,l=13εijk{rldlj}[0lBk(r0)],

Where εijk is the Levi-Civita symbol (+1ifijk=123,231, or312; 1ifijk=132, 213, or 321;0otherwise), in terms of which the cross-product can be written (A×B)i=j,k=13εijkAjBk. Use Eq. 1.108 to evaluate the integral. Note that

j=13εijkεljm=δilδkmδimδkl

Whereoil is the Kronecker delta (Prob. 3.52).




A current Iflows down a long straight wire of radius. If the wire is made of linear material (copper, say, or aluminium) with susceptibility Xm, and the current is distributed uniformly, what is the magnetic field a distances from the axis? Find all the bound currents. What is the net bound current flowing down the wire?

You are asked to referee a grant application, which proposes to determine whether the magnetization of iron is due to "Ampere" dipoles (current loops) or "Gilbert" dipoles (separated magnetic monopoles). The experiment will involve a cylinder of iron (radius Rand length L=10R), uniformly magnetized along the direction of its axis. If the dipoles are Ampere-type, the magnetization is equivalent to a surface bound current Kb=Mϕ^if they are Gilbert-type, the magnetization is equivalent to surface monopole densities σb=±Mat the two ends. Unfortunately, these two configurations produce identical magnetic fields, at exterior points. However, the interior fields are radically different-in the first case Bis in the same general direction as M, whereas in the second it is roughly opposite to M. The applicant proposes to measure this internal field by carving out a small cavity and finding the torque on a tiny compass needle placed inside.

Assuming that the obvious technical difficulties can be overcome, and that the question itself is worthy of study, would you advise funding this experiment? If so, what shape cavity would you recommend? If not, what is wrong with the proposal?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free