A parallel-plate capacitor C, with plate separation d, is given an initial charge (±)Q0. It is the0n connected to a resistor R, and discharges, Q(t)=Q0e-t/RC.

(a) What fraction of its initial energy(Q02/2C) does it radiate away?

(b) If C=1pF,R=1000Ω,and role="math" localid="1653972749344" d=0.1mm, what is the actual number? In electronics we don’t ordinarily worry about radiative losses; does that seem reasonable, in this case?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The fraction of energy radiated is EradE0=μ06πcd2R3C2.

(b) The actual number for the fractional energy loss is2.2×10-9 which is safe to neglect.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information:

Given data:

The decay of charge after a certain time interval is Qt=Q0e-t/RC.

The capacitance of a capacitor is C=1pF.

The resistance of a resistor is R=1000Ω

The position of the charge is d=0.1mm.

02

Determine the fraction of the radiated initial energy:

(a)

Write the expression for a fraction of energy radiated.

EradE0=0Pdt(Q022C) …… (1)

Here, P is the total radiated power from the parallel plate capacitor, and C is the capacitance of a capacitor.

Write the expression for the total radiated power from the parallel plate capacitor.

P=μ06πcp¨2 …… (2)

Here, μ0 is the magnetic permeability, c is the speed of light, and p is the dipole moment.

Write the expression for the dipole moment.

p=Qtd

Substitute Qt=Q0e-t/RCin the above expression.

p=Q0e-tRCd

Take the double differentiation of the above equation.

p˙=-Q0RCe-tRCdp¨=Q0RC2etRCd

Substitute p¨=Q0RC2e-tRCdin equation (2).

P=μ06πcQ0RC2e-tRCd2

Now, substitute P=μ06πcQ0RC2e-tRCd2to calculate the fraction of the radiated initial energy.

EradE0=0μ06πcQ0RC2e-tRCd2Q022cEradE0=μ06πcQ02d2RC40e-tRC2dt×2CQ02EradE0=μ03πcQ02d2RC4RC2e-2tRC0×CQ02EradE0=μ06πcd2R3C2........(3)

Therefore, the fraction of energy radiated is EradE0=μ06πcd2R3C2.

03

Determine the actual number:

(b)

Substituteμ0=4π×10-7H/m,d=0.1mm,c=3×108m/s,R=1000Ω andC=1pF in equation (3).

EradE04π×10-7H/m6π3×108m/s0.1mm×10-3m1mm21000Ω31pF×10-12F1pF2EradE0=2.2×10-9

As the fraction is very small, so this will be safe to neglect.

Therefore, the fractional energy loss is2.2×10-9 which is safe to neglect.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Use the result of Prob. 10.34 to determine the power radiated by an ideal electric dipole, , at the origin. Check that your answer is consistent with Eq. 11.22, in the case of sinusoidal time dependence, and with Prob. 11.26, in the case of quadratic time dependence.

An insulating circular ring (radius b) lies in the xy plane, centered at the origin. It carries a linear charge density λ=λ0sinϕ, whereλ0 is constant andϕ is the usual azimuthal angle. The ring is now set spinning at a constant angular velocity ω about the z axis. Calculate the power radiated

In Bohr’s theory of hydrogen, the electron in its ground state was supposed to travel in a circle of radius 5×10-11m, held in orbit by the Coulomb attraction of the proton. According to classical electrodynamics, this electron should radiate, and hence spiral in to the nucleus. Show thatvc for most of the trip (so you can use the Larmor formula), and calculate the lifespan of Bohr’s atom. (Assume each revolution is essentially circular.)

As you know, the magnetic north pole of the earth does not coincide with the geographic north pole—in fact, it’s off by about 11°. Relative to the fixed axis of rotation, therefore, the magnetic dipole moment of the earth is changing with time, and the earth must be giving off magnetic dipole radiation.

(a) Find the formula for the total power radiated, in terms of the following parameters:ψ (the angle between the geographic and magnetic north poles), M (the magnitude of the earth’s magnetic dipole moment), andω (the angular velocity of rotation of the earth). [Hint: refer to Prob. 11.4 or Prob. 11.11.]

(b) Using the fact that the earth’s magnetic field is about half a gauss at the equator, estimate the magnetic dipole moment Mof the earth.

(c) Find the power radiated. [Answer: 4×10-5W]

(d) Pulsars are thought to be rotating neutron stars, with a typical radius of 10 km, a rotational period of 10-3s, and a surface magnetic field of 108T. What sort of radiated power would you expect from such a star? [Answer: 2×1036W].

Deduce Eq. 11.100 from Eq. 11.99. Here are three methods:

(a) Use the Abraham-Lorentz formula to determine the radiation reaction on each end of the dumbbell; add this to the interaction term (Eq. 11.99).

(b) Method (a) has the defect that it uses the Abraham-Lorentz formula—the very thing that we were trying to derive. To avoid this,F(q) let be the total d-independent part of the self-force on a charge q. Then

F(q)=Fint(q)+2F(q2)

WhereFint is the interaction part (Eq. 11.99), andF(q2) is the self-force on each end. Now,F(q) must be proportional to q2, since the field is proportional to q and the force is qE. SoF(q2)=(14)F(q) Take it from there.

(c) Smear out the charge along a strip of length L oriented perpendicular to the motion (the charge density, then, is λ=qL); find the cumulative interaction force for all pairs of segments, using Eq. 11.99 (with the correspondence q2λdy, at one end and at the other). Make sure you don’t count the same pair twice.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free