Findthemomentum-spacewavefunctionϕn(p,t)forthenthstationarystateoftheinfinitesquarewell.Graph|ϕ1(p,t)|2and|ϕ2(p,t)|2,asfunctionsofp(payparticularattentiontothepointsp=±nπh/a).Useϕn(p,t)tocalculatetheexpectationvalueofp2.CompareyouranswertoProblem2.4.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The final result for the momentum-space time dependent wave function:ϕn(p,t)=πahne-iωntn2π2-a2p2/h2(1-(-1)neipa/h).

The expectation value ofp2=nπha2.

Step by step solution

01

Fourier transform  

A Fourier transform (FT) is a mathematical transformation that breaks down geographically or temporally dependent functions into spatially or temporally independent functions. First observe thenthin the coordinate representation for the infinite square well of width a: localid="1656312964496" ψn(x)=2asin(nπxa).

Now, the time-dependent solution to the given problem is just the stationary state multiplied by the time propagator:

localid="1656316815015" ψn(x,t)=2a-e-ntsin(nπxa).

Where the ωnis the abbreviation in the following context:

En=hωn=n2π2h22ma2

Now, the time dependent solution in the momentum representation is given by the Fourier transform of the coordinate basis, which connects the two basis. Therefore:

ϕn(p,t)=12πh-ψn(x,t)e-ipx/hdx=12πh2ae-iωnt0anπxae-ipx/hdx

The limits of the integration are from to since the wave function outside the box vanishes. Now isolate the integral and try to evaluate it.

l=0asin(Nx)e-kxdx

Where the abbreviations N=nπ/aand k=p/h.

02

Find the total solution to the integral l

Now rewrite the function in the terms of exponential function as follows:

sin(Nx)=12i(eiNx-e-iNx)

Therefore, the integrall has the following form:

l=0asin(Nx)e-ipx/hdx=0a12i(eiNx-e-iNx)e-ikxdx=12i0a(e-i(k-N)x-e-i(k+N)x)dx=l--l+

The integral lhas the following form:

l±=12i0ae-i(K±N)xdx=12ie-i(K±N)x-i(K±N)0a=12(K±N)(e-i(K±N)-1)

Therefore, the total solution to the integral lis:

l±=l--l+=12(K-N)(e-i(K-N)a-1)-12(K+N)(e-i(K+N)a-1)=e-i(Ka-nπ)2(K-N)-e-i(Ka+nπ)2(K+N)=(-1)ne-iKa2(K-nπ/a)-(-1)ne-iKa2(K+nπ/a)

03

Find momentum-space representation with the special case when n = 1 .

Now, combine this result for the integral with the time propagator and pre-factors, just obtain (by the use of common denominator) the final result for the momentum-space time dependent wave function: Φn(p,t)=πane-iωntn2π2-a2p2/2(1-(-1)ne-ipa/h)

Next, now that a general momentum-space representation is there find the special cases when n = 1 and n = 2 .

For n = 1 :

ϕ1(p,t)=πahe-iE1t/hπ2-a2p2/h2(1+e-ipa/h)=πahe-iE1t/hπ2-a2p2/h2e-ipa/2h(eipa/2h-e-ipa/2h)=2πahe-iE1t/hπ2-a2p2/h2e-ipa/2hcospa2h

Therefore, the square modulus can be simply obtained, a pure imaginary exponential function in the numerator is obtained:

ϕ2p,t2=4πahcos2(pa/2h(π2-a2p2/h2)2

04

Obtain the result for n = 2 and plot graph.

To obtain the result for n = 2, proceed in the similar manner as before, the only difference would now be that the factor (-1)nwill now yield a positive result, which in total will give a sin function. Since the steps are similar, they shall be skipped, so the final result is:

ϕ2(p,t)2=16πahsin2(pa/2h)(4π2-p2a2/h2)2

And the graph for the latter function has been shown below:

05

Find the expectation value of the  p2operator

To find the expectation value of the p2operator, first investigate how the momentum-space wave function depends on the parity of the number n. In the example for n = 1 and n = 2 the result obtained is sine and cosine functions. These numbers are by no means special; the same argument would hold for any other odd or even number n . Therefore, depending on the parity of the number n results can be obtained as sine or cosine function, as seen above. Next, it is important to notice that in momentum space, the expectation value of the p2operator is simply:

p2=-p2ϕ(p)2dp

Which in our case is simply by the use of the above facts about the parity of nfor the equation (1):

p2=4n2πah-p2(n2π2-a2p2/h2)2.Trig2(pa/2h)dp

Where the trig function is equal to cosine if n is odd and to sine if is even. The latter integral is not easy to evaluate, but it can be evaluated by a few different methods. One of the possibilities is to use complex analysis and evaluate the contour integral, second being partial fractions. Evaluate it for simplicity by the use of mathematics, since this is purely a mathematical step which brings no new important physics to the table. The integral, as some might've expected yields the same answer for either sine or cosine. The value of the integral is:

p2=nπha2

This is in agreement with the result of the problem 2.4 .

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Prove the famous "(your name) uncertainty principle," relating the uncertainty in position (A=x)to the uncertainty in energy(B=p2/2m+V): σxσH2m|p|

For stationary states this doesn't tell you much-why not?

Test the energy-time uncertainty principle for the free particle wave packet in Problem 2.43and the observable x , by calculating σHσx , and d<x>/dtexactly.

Consider the wave functionΨ(x,0)={12ei2πx/λ,-<x<0,

wherenis some positive integer. This function is purely sinusoidal (with wavelengthλ)on the interval-<x<, but it still carries a range of momenta, because the oscillations do not continue out to infinity. Find the momentum space wave functionΦ(p,0). Sketch the graphs of|Ψ(x,0)|2and|Φ(p,0)|2, and determine their widths,wxandwp(the distance between zeros on either side of the main peak). Note what happens to each width asn. Usingwxandwpas estimates ofxandp, check that the uncertainty principle is satisfied. Warning: If you try calculatingσp, you're in for a rude surprise. Can you diagnose the problem?

(a) Show that the sum of two hermitian operators is hermitian.

(b) SupposeQ^is hermitian, andαis a complex number. Under what condition (onα) islocalid="1655970881952" αQ^hermitian?

(c) When is the product of two hermitian operators hermitian?

(d) Show that the position operator (x^=x)and the hamiltonian operator

localid="1655971048829" H^=-h22md2dx2+V(x)are hermitian.

An anti-Hermitian (or skew-Hermitian) operator is equal to minus its Hermitian conjugate:

Qt=-Q

(a) Show that the expectation value of an anti-Hermitian operator is imaginary. (b) Show that the commutator of two Hermitian operators is anti-Hermitian. How about the commutator of two anti-Hermitian operators?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free