Extended uncertainty principle.The generalized uncertainty principle (Equation 3.62) states that

σA2σB214<C>2

whereC^-i[A^,B^̂]..

(a) Show that it can be strengthened to read

σA2σB214(<C>2+<D>2) [3.99]

whereD^A^B^+B^A^-2AB.. Hint: Keep the term in Equation 3.60

(b) Check equation 3.99 for the caseB=A(the standard uncertainty principle is trivial, in this case, sinceC^=0; unfortunately, the extended uncertainty principle doesn't help much either).

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a)σA2σB214(D2+C2)(b)σA2σA2σA4

Step by step solution

01

Schwarz inequality

Schwarz inequality is |<ab>|2<aa><bb>..

In statistics, the variance is expressed as “the average of the square of the difference from the mean”. So, for an observable A^we have:σA2(A^-<A>)2

02

Solve for z and apply Schwarz inequality

(a)

For an observableA^ the variance can be written as:

σA2(A^-A)2

Further solving above equation,

σA2=ψI(A^-A)2ψ=(A^-A)ψI(A^-A)ψσA2=flf

And for an observable we can write:

σB2=ψI(B^-B)2ψ=(B-B)ψI(B^-B)ψσB2=glg

From above two equations of variance,

σA2σB2=ffgg|fg|2 …… (1)

Where used Schwarz inequality . For any complex number z=x+iy,we have:

|z|2=[Re(z)]2+[Im(z)]2=12(z+z*)2+12i(z-z*)2(2)

03

Solve for σA2σB2

Letz=fg; thus|fg|2=|z|2. Substitute from (2) into (1) to get (note thatz=fg).

σA2σB212(z+z*)2+12i(z-z*)2=12fg+gf2+12i(fg-gf)2

Find and , as:

fg=(A^-A)Ψ(B^-B)Ψ=Ψ|(A^-A)(B^-BΨ=Ψ|̂(A^B^-A^B-AB^+ABΨ=A^B^-AB-AB+ABfg=A^B^-AB(4)

For observable .

gf=A^B^-AB(5)

Adding equations (4) and (5) we can write:

fg+gf=A^B^-AB+B^A^-AB=A^B^+B^A^-2AB=D

Subtracting equations and we can write:

fg-gf=A^B^-B^A^=[A^,B^]

Substitute into (3) we get:

σA2σB214(D2+C2).

Thus, the generalized uncertainty principle can be strengthened to read role="math" localid="1656317038528" σA2σB214(D2+C2)..

04

Solve for σA2σA2

(b)

For the case of A^=B^the values ofC^&D^ are:

C^=0D^=2(A^2-A2)

Further solving above values of role="math" localid="1656320627569" C^&D^as:

C=0D=2(A^2-A2)=2σA2

Substitute into the result of part (a) we get:

σA2σA2(1/4)4σA4=σA4σA2σA2σA4

Thus, the is true, but not tell you anything since both sides are equal. Therefore, it is not very informativeσA2σA2σA4

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Hermitian conjugate (or adjoint) of an operator Q^is the operatorQ^such that

fQ^g=Q^fg (forallfandg).

(A Hermitian operator, then, is equal to its Hermitian conjugate:Q^=Q^)

(a)Find the Hermitian conjugates of x, i, andd/dx.

(b) Construct the Hermitian conjugate of the harmonic oscillator raising operator,a+(Equation 2.47).

(c) Show that(Q^R^)=R^Q^.

In an interesting version of the energy-time uncertainty principle31, t=τ/πwhere τis the time it takesΨ(x,t)to evolve into a state orthogonal toΨ(x,0) . Test this out, using a wave function that is an equal admixture of two (orthonormal) stationary states of some (arbitrary) potential:Ψ(x,0)=(1/2)[Ψ1x+Ψ2(x)]

A harmonic oscillator is in a state such that a measurement of the energy would yield either(1/2)hωor (3/2) hω, with equal probability. What is the largest possible value of in such a state? If it assumes this maximal value at time t=0 , what is ψ(x,t) ?

Findthemomentum-spacewavefunctionϕn(p,t)forthenthstationarystateoftheinfinitesquarewell.Graph|ϕ1(p,t)|2and|ϕ2(p,t)|2,asfunctionsofp(payparticularattentiontothepointsp=±nπh/a).Useϕn(p,t)tocalculatetheexpectationvalueofp2.CompareyouranswertoProblem2.4.

Coherent states of the harmonic oscillator. Among the stationary states of the harmonic oscillator (Equation 2.67) only n = 0 hits the uncertainty limit (σxσp=h/2); in general, σxσp=(2n+1)h/2, as you found in Problem 2.12. But certain linear combinations (known as coherent states) also minimize the uncertainty product. They are (as it turns out) Eigen functions of the lowering operator

ψn=1n!(a^+)nψ0(2.68).

a_|α>=α|a>(the Eigen value α can be any complex number).

(a)Calculate <x>,<x2>,<p>,<p2>in the state |α〉. Hint: Use the technique in Example 2.5, and remember that is the Hermitian conjugate of a-. Do not assume α is real.

(b) Find σx; show that σxσp=h/2.

(c) Like any other wave function, a coherent state can be expanded in terms of energy Eigen states: |α>=n=0Cn|n>.

Show that the expansion coefficients arecn=αnn!c0.

(d) Determine by normalizing |α〉. Answer: exp(-α2/2)

(e) Now put in the time dependence: |n>e-iEntIh|n>,

and show that |αt|remains an Eigen state of a-, but the Eigen value evolves in time:α(t)=e-iωt So a coherent state stays coherent, and continues to minimize the uncertainty product.

(f) Is the ground state (n=0>)itself a coherent state? If so, what is the Eigen value?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free