Chapter 5: Q19P (page 229)
Find the energy at the bottom of the first allowed band, for the case , correct to three significant digits. For the sake of argument, assume eV.
Short Answer
The energy at the bottom of the first band is 0.345eV.
Chapter 5: Q19P (page 229)
Find the energy at the bottom of the first allowed band, for the case , correct to three significant digits. For the sake of argument, assume eV.
The energy at the bottom of the first band is 0.345eV.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeSuppose you had three (noninteracting) particles, in thermal equilibrium in a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator potential, with a total energy .
(a) If they are distinguishable particles (but all with the same mass), what are the possible occupation-number configurations, and how many distinct (threeparticle) states are there for each one? What is the most probable configuration? If you picked a particle at random and measured its energy, what values might you get, and what is the probability of each one? What is the most probable energy?
(b) Do the same for the case of identical fermions (ignoring spin, as we did in Section 5.4.1).
(c) Do the same for the case of identical bosons (ignoring spin).
a) Hund’s first rule says that, consistent with the Pauli principle, the state with the highest total spin (S) will have the lowest energy. What would this predict in the case of the excited states of helium?
(b) Hund’s second rule says that, for a given spin, the state with the highest total orbital angular momentum (L) , consistent with overall antisymmetrization, will have the lowest energy. Why doesn’t carbon have? Note that the “top of the ladder”is symmetric.
(c) Hund’s third rule says that if a subshellis no more than half filled,
then the lowest energy level has; if it is more than half filled, thenhas the lowest energy. Use this to resolve the boron ambiguity inProblem 5.12(b).
(d) Use Hund’s rules, together with the fact that a symmetric spin state must go with an antisymmetric position state (and vice versa) to resolve the carbon and nitrogen ambiguities in Problem 5.12(b). Hint: Always go to the “top of the ladder” to figure out the symmetry of a state.
We can extend the theory of a free electron gas (Section 5.3.1) to the relativistic domain by replacing the classical kinetic energy, ,with the relativistic formula, . Momentum is related to the wave vector in the usual way: . In particular, in the extreme relativistic limit,
(a) Replace n Equation 5.55 by the ultra-relativistic expression, , and calculatein this regime.
(5.55).
(b) Repeat parts (a) and (b) of Problem 5.35 for the ultra-relativistic electron gas. Notice that in this case there is no stable minimum, regardless of R; if the total energy is positive, degeneracy forces exceed gravitational forces, and the star will expand, whereas if the total is negative, gravitational forces win out, and the star will collapse. Find the critical number of nucleons, Nc , such that gravitational collapse occurs for is called the Chandrasekhar limit.
(c) At extremely high density, inverse beta decay,converts virtually all of the protons and electrons into neutrons (liberating neutrinos, which carry off energy, in the process). Eventually neutron degeneracy pressure stabilizes the collapse, just as electron degeneracy does for the white dwarf (see Problem 5.35). Calculate the radius of a neutron star with the mass of the sun. Also calculate the (neutron) Fermi energy, and compare it to the rest energy of a neutron. Is it reasonable to treat a neutron star non relativistic ally?
The ground state of dysprosium (element 66, in the 6th row of the Periodic Table)
is listed as . What are the total spin, total orbital, and grand total angular
momentum quantum numbers? Suggest a likely electron configuration for
dysprosium.
Derive the Stefan-Boltzmann formula for the total energy density in blackbody radiation
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.