Starting from the Rodrigues formula, derive the orthonormality condition for Legendre polynomials:

-11Pl(x)PI(x)dx=(22l+1)δII.

Hint: Use integration by parts.

Short Answer

Expert verified

We derive the orthonormality condition for Legendre polynomials:

-11Pn(x)Pm(x)dx=22n+1δnm

Step by step solution

01

Concept used

The Legendre polynomials:

Pn(x)=k=0n/2(2n-2k)!2n(n-k)!k!(n-2k)!(-1)kxn-2k

02

Given information from question

As an explicit sum, the Legendre polynomials could be stated as follows:

Pn(x)=k=0n/2(2n-2k)!2n(n-k)!k!(n-2k)!(-1)kxn-2k...........(1)

If , kn/2 we can write:

dndxnx2n-2k=(2n-2k)!(n-2k)!xn-2k

Note that if k>n/2 , the derivative ofx2n-2k is zero, since after then/2 derivatives, the termx2n-2k is reduced to a constant. Therefore:

Pn(x)=k=0n/2(-1)k2n(n-k)!k!dndxnx2n-2k=k=0n(-1)k2n(n-k)!k!dndxnx2n-2k=12nn!dndxnk=0n-1kn!n-k!k!x2n-2k=12nn!dndxnk=0n-1kn!n-k!k!x2n-2k

In the last line the sum is the binomial expansion of x2-1n, that is:

(x2-1)n=k=0n(-1)kn!(n-k)!k!x2n-2kPn(x)=12nn!dndxn(x2-1)n

03

Use given formula

Using this formula, we can write:

-11Pm(x)Pn(x)dx=12m+nm!n!-11dmdxm(x2-1)mdndxn(x2-1)ndx

Assume that m<n, then do the integral by parts, as:

=-11dmdxm(x2-1)mdndxn(x2-1)ndx=dn-1dxn-1(x2-1)ndmdxm(x2-1)m1-11--11dm+1dxm+1(x2-1)mdn-1dxn-1(x2-1)ndx

We see that the first term is zero at 1 and -1 , so the first term vanishes. Now we can continue by integrating the remaining integral by parts, note that the first term always vanishes, after we have done n integrations, we will get:

-11Pm(x)Pn(x)dx=12m+nm!n!-1n-11(x2-1)ndm+ndxm+n(x2-1)mdx ……. (2)

Since m<n, then the derivative inside the integral is zero, because the largest power of x inx2-1m isx2m and 2m<m+n, thus:

-11Pm(x)Pn(x)dx=0

This means formn (it doesn't matter if n>morm>n, it is the same case since we can swap the indexes) the polynomials are orthogonal.

Now, set n=min equation (2), so we get:

-11Pn(x)Pn(x)dx=(-1)n(n!)222n-11(x2-1)nd2ndx2n(x2-1)ndx

The 2nth derivative inside the integral will cause all the terms inx2-1n vanishes except x2nsince 2nth derivative cancels all the terms with a power less than the rank of the derivative. That is:

d2ndx2nx2-1n=d2ndx2nx2n=2n!

Thus, we can write:

-11Pn(x)Pn(x)dx=(-1)n(2n)!(n!)222n-11(x2-1)ndx.(3)

let ,role="math" localid="1656393894301" x=sin(θ),sodx=cos(θ) so and the limits are:

-1-π21π2

Substitute the limits:

role="math" localid="1656394169842" -11x2-1ndx=-π/2π/2sin2(θ)-1ncos(θ)

But, sin2(θ)-1=cos2(θ), thus:

-11x2-1ndx=-π/2π/2cos2n+1(θ)

The value of the integral is the beta function B12,n, so:

-11(x2-1)ndx=(-1)nB(12,n+1)

04

Calculate the beta function and gamma function

The beta function is given by:

B(a,b)=Γ(a)Γ(b)(Γ(a+b)

It can also be written as:

-11(x2-1)ndx=(-1)nΓ12Γ(n+1)Γn+32

The gamma function is given byΓ(n)=(n-1) ! where Γ12=π, so:

-11(x2-1)ndx=(-1)n(n)!πΓn+12

It can also be written as:

Γn+32=Γ(n+1)+12=π(2n+1)!21-2nn!

As a result, the integral's value will be:

-11x2-1ndx=-1nn!221+2n2n+1!

Substitute value in equation (3),

role="math" localid="1656394760208" -11Pn(x)Pn(x)dx=1n!222n2n!-12nn!221+2n2n+1!=22n+1

Combine this result with the case when mn, so we can write:

role="math" localid="1656394529070" -11Pn(x)Pm(x)dx=22n+1δnm

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If the electron were a classical solid sphere, with radius

rc=e24πO0˙mc2

(the so-called classical electron radius, obtained by assuming the electron's mass is attributable to energy stored in its electric field, via the Einstein formula E=mc2), and its angular momentum is (1/2)h then how fast (in m/sm/s) would a point on the "equator" be moving? Does this model make sense? (Actually, the radius of the electron is known experimentally to be much less than5.156×1010m/src, but this only makes matters worse).

(a) Starting with the canonical commutation relations for position and momentum (Equation 4.10), work out the following commutators:

[LZ,X]=ihy,[LZ,y]=-ihx,[LZ,Z]=0[LZ,px]=ihpy,[LZ,py]=-ihpx,[LZ,pz]=0

(b) Use these results to obtain [LZ,LX]=ihLydirectly from Equation 4.96.

(c) Evaluate the commutators [Lz,r2]and[Lz,p2](where, of course, r2=x2+y2+z2andp2=px2+py2+pz2)

(d) Show that the Hamiltonian H=(p2/2m)+Vcommutes with all three components of L, provided that V depends only on r . (Thus H,L2,andLZand are mutually compatible observables.)

Use equations 4.27 4.28 and 4.32 to constructy00,y21Check that they are normalized and orthogonal

The electron in a hydrogen atom occupies the combined spin and position stateR211/3Y10χ++2/3Y11χ-

(a) If you measured the orbital angular momentum squared L2, what values might you get, and what is the probability of each?

(b) Same for the component of orbital angular momentum Lz.

(c) Same for the spin angular momentum squaredS2 .

(d) Same for the component of spin angular momentum Sz.

Let JL+Sbe the total angular momentum.

(e) If you measureddata-custom-editor="chemistry" J2 , what values might you get, and what is the probability of each?

(f) Same forJz .

(g) If you measured the position of the particle, what is the probability density for finding it atr , θ,ϕ ?

(h) If you measured both the component of the spin and the distance from the origin (note that these are compatible observables), what is the probability density for finding the particle with spin up and at radius ?

(a) Construct the wave function for hydrogen in the state n=4,I=3,m=3. Express your answer as a function of the spherical coordinates r,θandϕ.

(b) Find the expectation value of role="math" localid="1658391074946" rin this state. (As always, look up any nontrivial integrals.)

(c) If you could somehow measure the observable Lx2+Ly2on an atom in this state, what value (or values) could you get, and what is the probability of each?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free