Suppose you’re given a two-level quantum system whose (time-independent) Hamiltonian H0admits just two Eigen states, Ψa (with energy Ea ), and Ψb(with energy Eb ). They are orthogonal, normalized, and non-degenerate (assume Ea is the smaller of the two energies). Now we turn on a perturbation H′, with the following matrix elements:

Ψa|H'|Ψa=Ψb|H'|Ψb=0;Ψa|H'|Ψb=Ψb|H'|Ψa (7.74).

where h is some specified constant.

(a) Find the exact Eigen values of the perturbed Hamiltonian.

(b) Estimate the energies of the perturbed system using second-order perturbation theory.

(c) Estimate the ground state energy of the perturbed system using the variation principle, with a trial function of the form

Ψ=(cosϕ)Ψa+(sinϕ)ψb (7.75).

where ϕ is an adjustable parameter. Note: Writing the linear combination in this way is just a neat way to guarantee that ψ is normalized.

(d) Compare your answers to (a), (b), and (c). Why is the variational principle so accurate, in this case?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a)E±=12Ea+Eb±Ea-Eb2+4h2

(b)E-Ea-h2Eb-Ea;E+Eb+h2Eb-Ea

(c)Hmin=-12Ea+Eb±Eb-Ea2+4h2

(d) Using Taylor series (small h) to expand results in (a) we obtained results from

Step by step solution

01

(a) Finding the exact Eigen value

In order to find Eigen values of H, calculate:

detH-λ.l=0Ea-λEb-λ-h2=0λ2-λEa+Eb+EaEb-h2=0

λ=12Ea+Eb±Ea2+2EaEb+Eb2-4EaEb+4h2E±=12Ea+Eb±Ea-Eb2+4h2

02

Step 2:(b) Estimating the energies

Zero order: Ea0=Ea,Eb0=Eb

First order: Ea1=ψa|H'|ψa=0,Eb1=ψb|H'|ψb=0

Second order:

Ea2=ψb|H'|ψa2Ea-Eb=-h2Eb-Ea;Eb2=ψa|H'|ψb2Eb-Ea=h2Eb-EaE-Ea-h2Eb-Ea;E+Eb+h2Eb-Ea

03

 Step 3:(c) Estimating the ground state energy

Here estimating the ground state energy.

H=cosϕψa+sinϕψbH0+H'cosϕψa+sinϕψb=cos2ϕψa|H0|ψa+sin2ϕψb|H0|ψb+sinϕcosϕψb|H'|ψa+sinϕcosϕψa|H'|ψb=Eacos2+Ebsin2ϕ+2hsinϕcosϕ

So,

Hϕ=-Ea2cosϕsinϕ+Eb2sinϕcosϕ+2hcos2ϕ-sin2ϕ=Eb-Easin2ϕ+2hcos2ϕ=0tan2ϕ=-2hEb-Ea=-o˙whereo˙2hEb-Ea.sin2ϕ1-sin22ϕ=-o˙;sin22ϕ=o˙21-sin22ϕorsin22ϕ1+o˙2=o˙2;sin2ϕ=±o˙1+o˙2;cos22ϕ=1-sin22ϕ

=1-o˙21+o˙2=11+o˙2;cos2ϕ=+11+o˙2signdictatedbytan2ϕ=sin2ϕcos2ϕ=-o˙.cos2ϕ=121+cos2ϕ=121+11+o˙2;sin2ϕ=121-cos2ϕ=121±11+o˙2

Hmin=12Ea1+11+o˙2+12Eb1±11+o˙2±ho˙1+o˙2=12Ea+Eb±Eb+Ea+2ho˙1+o2˙

But

Eb-Ea+2ho˙1+o˙2=Eb-Ea+2h2hEb-Ea1+4h2Eb-Ea2=Eb-Ea2+4h2Eb-Ea2+4h2=Eb-Ea2+4h2SoHmin=12Ea+Eb±Eb-Ea2+4h2

04

 Step 4:(d) Comparing (a),(b) and (c)

We can obtain results from task (b) if we expand in Taylor series exact energies from task (a). we use limit where h is very small, which has to be if we want to use perturbation theory:

E±=12[Ea+Eb±Eb+Ea1+4h2Eb+EaE±12Ea+Eb±Eb+Ea1+2h2Eb+Ea2=12Ea+Eb±Eb+Ea±2h2Eb+Ea

so localid="1658396154675" E+Eb+h2Eb+Ea,E-Ea-h2Eb+Ea,

Confirming the perturbation theory results in (b). The variation principle (c) gets the ground state(E−) exactly right-not too surprising since the trial wave function Eq. 7.75 is almost the most general state (there could be a relative phase factor eiθ .

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The fundamental problem in harnessing nuclear fusion is getting the two particles (say, two deuterons) close enough together for the attractive (but short-range) nuclear force to overcome the Coulomb repulsion. The “bulldozer” method is to heat the particles up to fantastic temperatures and allow the random collisions to bring them together. A more exotic proposal is muon catalysis, in which we construct a “hydrogen molecule ion,” only with deuterons in place of protons, and a muon in place of the electron. Predict the equilibrium separation distance between the deuterons in such a structure, and explain why muons are superior to electrons for this purpose.

InProblem 7.7we found that the trial wave function with shielding (Equation 7.27), which worked well for helium, is inadequate to confirm the existence of a bound state for the negative hydrogen ion.

ψ1(r1,r2)z3πa3e-z(r1+r2)/a (7.27)

Chandrasekhar used a trial wave function of the form

ψ(r1,r2)A[ψ1(r1)ψ2(r2)+ψ2(r1)ψ1(r2)] (7.62).

Where

ψ1(r)z13πa3e-z1/a,ψ1(r)z23πa3e-z2/a,(7.63)

In effect, he allowed two different shielding factors, suggesting that one electron is relatively close to the nucleus, and the other is farther out. (Because electrons are identical particles, the spatial wave function must be symmetries with respect to interchange. The spin state—which is irrelevant to the calculation—is evidently anti symmetric.) Show that by astute choice of the adjustable parameters Z1and Z2you can get<H>less than -13.6.

Answer: :<H>=E1x6+y6(-x8+2x7+12x6y2-12x5y2-18x3y4+118xy6-12y8).

Wherexz1+z2.y2z1z2Chandrasekhar usedZ1=1.039

(Since this is larger than 1, the motivating interpretation as an effective nuclear charge cannot be sustained, but never mindit’s still an acceptable trial wave function) andZ2=0.283.

Find the best bound on Egsfor the delta-function potentialV(x)=-αδ(x), using a triangular trial function (Equation 7.10, only centered at the origin). This time a is an adjustable parameter.

Evaluate Dand X(Equations and ). Check your answers against Equations 7.47and 7.48.

Use a gaussian trial function (Equation 7.2) to obtain the lowest upper bound you can on the ground state energy of (a) the linear potential V(x)=α|x| (b) the quartic potential:V(x)=αx4

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free