Although the Schrödinger equation for helium itself cannot be solved exactly, there exist “helium-like” systems that do admit exact solutions. A simple example is “rubber-band helium,” in which the Coulomb forces are replaced by Hooke’s law forces:

H=-ħ22m(12+22)+12mω2|r1-r1|2(8.78).

(a) Show that the change of variables from

r1,r2,tor1,r2,tou12(r1+r2),v12(r1+r2) (8.79).

turns the Hamiltonian into two independent three-dimensional harmonic oscillators:

H=[-ħ2mu2+12mω2u2]+[-ħ2mu2+121-λmω2u2](8.80)

(b) What is the exact ground state energy for this system?

(c) If we didn’t know the exact solution, we might be inclined to apply the method of Section 7.2 to the Hamiltonian in its original form (Equation 7.78). Do so (but don’t bother with shielding). How does your result compare with the exact answer? Answer:(H)=3ħω(1-λ/4)a.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) Required equation is proved.

(b)Egs=32ħω(1+1-λ)

(c)Egs32ħω(1+1-12ħ)=3ħω(1-λ4)

Step by step solution

01

(a)Showing the changes of variables

r1=12(u+v);r2=12(u-v);r12+r22=12(u2+2uv+v2+u2-2uv+v2)=u2+v2(12+22)f(r1,r2)=2fx12+2fy12+2fz122fx22+2fy22+2fz22fx1=fuxuxx1+fvxvxx1=12fux+fvx;fx2=fuxuxx2+fvxfx1=12x1fu1+fvx=122fux2uxx1+2fuxvxvxx1+2fuxux

=122fux2+22fuxvx+2fvx2.2x22=12x2fux-fvx=122fux2uxx2+2fuxvxvxx2-2fv2uxuxx2-2fv2xvxx2.=122fux2-22fuxvx+2fvx2.So2fx12+2fx22=2fux2+2fvx2,andlikewiseforyandz:12+22=u2+v2.H=ħ22mu2+v2+122u2+v2-λ422v2H=-ħ22mu2+122u2+ħ22mv2+122u2-12λmω2v2

02

(b) The exact ground state energy 

The energy is

32ħωfortheupartand32ħω1-λforthevpart:Egs=32ħω1+1-λ.

03

(c) The ground state for one dimension oscillator 

The ground state for a one-dimensional oscillator is

ψ0(x)=mω1/4πe-max2/2(Eq.2.60)So,fora3-Doscillator,thegroundstateisisψ0(r)=π3/4e-mωr2/2andfortwoparticlesΨr1,r2=π3/4e-2r21,r22(ThisistheanalogtoEq.7.18.)Ψr1,r2Ψ100r1Ψ100r2=8πa3e-2r1,r2/aH=32ω+32ω+Vee=3ω+Vee(TheanalogtoEq.7.20).H=8E1+Vee(8.20).

localid="1655995511764" Vee=-λ4mω2mωπħ3e-mωħr12+r22r1-r22r12-2r1-r2+r22d3r1d3r2Vee=e24π00,8πa32e-4r1+r2/ar1-r2d3r1d3r2Ther1,r2termintegratestozero,bysymmetry,andther22termisthesameasther12term,soVee=-λ4mω2mωπħ3e-mωħr12+r22r12d3r1d3r2.=-λ4mω2mωπħ34π2000e-mωr22/ħr22dr2000e-mωr12/ħr14dr1.=-λ8m4ω5πħ314ħmωπħmω38ħmω2πħmω=-34λħω.H=3ħω-34λħω=3ħω1-λ4.Thevariationprinciplesaysthismustexceedtheexactground-stateenergy(b);letscheckit:

3ħω1-λ4>32ħω1+1-λ2-λ2>1+1-λ1-λ2>1-λ1-λ-λ24>1-λ.Itchecks.Infact,expandingtheexactanswerinpowersofλ,Egs32ħω1+1-12λ=3ħω1-λ4,werecoverthevariationresult.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

a) Use the variational principle to prove that first-order non-degenerate perturbation theory always overestimates (or at any rate never underestimates) the ground state energy.

(b) In view of (a), you would expect that the second-order correction to the ground state is always negative. Confirm that this is indeed the case, by examining Equation 6.15.

Find the lowest bound on the ground state of hydrogen you can get using a Gaussian trial wave function

ψ(r)=Ae-br2,

where A is determined by normalization and b is an adjustable parameter. Answer-11.5eV

InProblem 7.7we found that the trial wave function with shielding (Equation 7.27), which worked well for helium, is inadequate to confirm the existence of a bound state for the negative hydrogen ion.

ψ1(r1,r2)z3πa3e-z(r1+r2)/a (7.27)

Chandrasekhar used a trial wave function of the form

ψ(r1,r2)A[ψ1(r1)ψ2(r2)+ψ2(r1)ψ1(r2)] (7.62).

Where

ψ1(r)z13πa3e-z1/a,ψ1(r)z23πa3e-z2/a,(7.63)

In effect, he allowed two different shielding factors, suggesting that one electron is relatively close to the nucleus, and the other is farther out. (Because electrons are identical particles, the spatial wave function must be symmetries with respect to interchange. The spin state—which is irrelevant to the calculation—is evidently anti symmetric.) Show that by astute choice of the adjustable parameters Z1and Z2you can get<H>less than -13.6.

Answer: :<H>=E1x6+y6(-x8+2x7+12x6y2-12x5y2-18x3y4+118xy6-12y8).

Wherexz1+z2.y2z1z2Chandrasekhar usedZ1=1.039

(Since this is larger than 1, the motivating interpretation as an effective nuclear charge cannot be sustained, but never mindit’s still an acceptable trial wave function) andZ2=0.283.

The fundamental problem in harnessing nuclear fusion is getting the two particles (say, two deuterons) close enough together for the attractive (but short-range) nuclear force to overcome the Coulomb repulsion. The “bulldozer” method is to heat the particles up to fantastic temperatures and allow the random collisions to bring them together. A more exotic proposal is muon catalysis, in which we construct a “hydrogen molecule ion,” only with deuterons in place of protons, and a muon in place of the electron. Predict the equilibrium separation distance between the deuterons in such a structure, and explain why muons are superior to electrons for this purpose.

Evaluate Dand X(Equations and ). Check your answers against Equations 7.47and 7.48.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free