The fundamental problem in harnessing nuclear fusion is getting the two particles (say, two deuterons) close enough together for the attractive (but short-range) nuclear force to overcome the Coulomb repulsion. The “bulldozer” method is to heat the particles up to fantastic temperatures and allow the random collisions to bring them together. A more exotic proposal is muon catalysis, in which we construct a “hydrogen molecule ion,” only with deuterons in place of protons, and a muon in place of the electron. Predict the equilibrium separation distance between the deuterons in such a structure, and explain why muons are superior to electrons for this purpose.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The equilibrium separation distance between deuterons isR=6.73×10-13m.

Step by step solution

01

The equilibrium separation distance between the deuterons

The equilibrium separation distance between the deuterons butmemrthe reduced mass of themuon:

role="math" localid="1658383790270" mr=mμmdmμ+md=mμ2mpmμ+2mp=mμ1+mμ/2mp.mμ=207me,

so

1+mμmp=1+20729.11×10-311.67×10-27=1.056;mr=207me1.056=196me

02

Explaining why muons are superior to electrons

This shrinks the muonic \Bohr radius” down by a factor of nearly 200. but nowis the ground state energy of the muonic atom. The potential energy associated with the deuteron-deuteron repulsion is the same as, and since the productis independent of mass, it doesn’t matter whether we write it using the electron values or the muon values. the entire molecule shrinks by that same factor of 196. The equilibrium separation for the electron case was 2.493 a (Problem 7.10),Therefore, The general equation of

R=2.4931960.529×10-10m=6.73×10-10m

Thus the equilibrium separation distance between deuterons is R=6.73×10-10m.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a) GeneralizeProblem 7.2, using the trial wave function

ψ(x)=A(x2+b2)n,

For arbitrary n. Partial answer: The best value of b is given by

localid="1658300238725" b2=hmω[n(4n-1)(4n-3)2(2n+1)]1/2

(b) Find the least upper bound on the first excited state of the harmonic oscillator using a trial function of the form

ψ(x)=Bx(x2+b2)n.

Partial answer: The best value of b is given by

localid="1658300555415" b2=hmω[n(4n-5)(4n-3)2(2n+1)]1/2.

(c) Notice that the bounds approach the exact energies as n →∞. Why is that? Hint: Plot the trial wave functions for n = 2 , n = 3 , and n = 4, and compare them with the true wave functions (Equations 2.59 and 2.62). To do it analytically, start with the identity

ez=limn(1+zn)nψ0(x)=(mωπh)1/4e-mω2hx2 (2.59).

ψ1(x)=A1a^+ψ0=A12hmω(-hddx+mωx)(mωπh)1/4e-mω2hx2ψ1(x)=A1(mωπh)1/42mωhxe-mω2hx2(2.62).

Suppose you’re given a two-level quantum system whose (time-independent) Hamiltonian H0admits just two Eigen states, Ψa (with energy Ea ), and Ψb(with energy Eb ). They are orthogonal, normalized, and non-degenerate (assume Ea is the smaller of the two energies). Now we turn on a perturbation H′, with the following matrix elements:

Ψa|H'|Ψa=Ψb|H'|Ψb=0;Ψa|H'|Ψb=Ψb|H'|Ψa (7.74).

where h is some specified constant.

(a) Find the exact Eigen values of the perturbed Hamiltonian.

(b) Estimate the energies of the perturbed system using second-order perturbation theory.

(c) Estimate the ground state energy of the perturbed system using the variation principle, with a trial function of the form

Ψ=(cosϕ)Ψa+(sinϕ)ψb (7.75).

where ϕ is an adjustable parameter. Note: Writing the linear combination in this way is just a neat way to guarantee that ψ is normalized.

(d) Compare your answers to (a), (b), and (c). Why is the variational principle so accurate, in this case?

(a) Prove the following corollary to the variational principle: If ψψgs=0thenáHñEfe whereEfe is the energy of the first excited state. Comment: If we can find a trial function that is orthogonal to the exact ground state, we can get an upper bound on the first excited state. In general, it's difficult to be sure that is orthogonal toψgsi since (presumably) we don't know the latter. However, if the potentialV(x) is an even function of x, then the ground state is likewise even, and hence any odd trial function will automatically meet the condition for the corollary.

(b) Find the best bound on the first excited state of the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator using the trial functionψ(x)=Axe-bx2

Evaluate Dand X(Equations and ). Check your answers against Equations 7.47and 7.48.

Although the Schrödinger equation for helium itself cannot be solved exactly, there exist “helium-like” systems that do admit exact solutions. A simple example is “rubber-band helium,” in which the Coulomb forces are replaced by Hooke’s law forces:

H=-ħ22m(12+22)+12mω2|r1-r1|2(8.78).

(a) Show that the change of variables from

r1,r2,tor1,r2,tou12(r1+r2),v12(r1+r2) (8.79).

turns the Hamiltonian into two independent three-dimensional harmonic oscillators:

H=[-ħ2mu2+12mω2u2]+[-ħ2mu2+121-λmω2u2](8.80)

(b) What is the exact ground state energy for this system?

(c) If we didn’t know the exact solution, we might be inclined to apply the method of Section 7.2 to the Hamiltonian in its original form (Equation 7.78). Do so (but don’t bother with shielding). How does your result compare with the exact answer? Answer:(H)=3ħω(1-λ/4)a.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free