The fundamental problem in harnessing nuclear fusion is getting the two particles (say, two deuterons) close enough together for the attractive (but short-range) nuclear force to overcome the Coulomb repulsion. The “bulldozer” method is to heat the particles up to fantastic temperatures and allow the random collisions to bring them together. A more exotic proposal is muon catalysis, in which we construct a “hydrogen molecule ion,” only with deuterons in place of protons, and a muon in place of the electron. Predict the equilibrium separation distance between the deuterons in such a structure, and explain why muons are superior to electrons for this purpose.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The equilibrium separation distance between deuterons isR=6.73×10-13m.

Step by step solution

01

The equilibrium separation distance between the deuterons

The equilibrium separation distance between the deuterons butmemrthe reduced mass of themuon:

role="math" localid="1658383790270" mr=mμmdmμ+md=mμ2mpmμ+2mp=mμ1+mμ/2mp.mμ=207me,

so

1+mμmp=1+20729.11×10-311.67×10-27=1.056;mr=207me1.056=196me

02

Explaining why muons are superior to electrons

This shrinks the muonic \Bohr radius” down by a factor of nearly 200. but nowis the ground state energy of the muonic atom. The potential energy associated with the deuteron-deuteron repulsion is the same as, and since the productis independent of mass, it doesn’t matter whether we write it using the electron values or the muon values. the entire molecule shrinks by that same factor of 196. The equilibrium separation for the electron case was 2.493 a (Problem 7.10),Therefore, The general equation of

R=2.4931960.529×10-10m=6.73×10-10m

Thus the equilibrium separation distance between deuterons is R=6.73×10-10m.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Evaluate Dand X(Equations and ). Check your answers against Equations 7.47and 7.48.

As an explicit example of the method developed inProblem 7.15, consider an electron at rest in a uniform magnetic field B=B2kfor which the Hamiltonian is (Equation 4.158):

H=-γB (4.158).

H0=eBzmSz (7.57).

The eigenspinors, xaarelocalid="1655969802629" xb,andthecorrespondingenergies,EaandEb,aregiven in Equation 4.161. Now we turn on a perturbation, in the form of a uniform field in the x direction:

{x+,withenergyE+=-γB0ħ/2x-,withenergyE-=+-γB0ħ/2 (4.161).

H'=eBxmSx (7.58).

(a) Find the matrix elements of H′, and confirm that they have the structure of Equation 7.55. What is h?

(b) Using your result inProblem 7.15(b), find the new ground state energy, in second-order perturbation theory.

(c) Using your result inProblem 7.15(c), find the variation principle bound on the ground state energy.

Although the Schrödinger equation for helium itself cannot be solved exactly, there exist “helium-like” systems that do admit exact solutions. A simple example is “rubber-band helium,” in which the Coulomb forces are replaced by Hooke’s law forces:

H=-ħ22m(12+22)+12mω2|r1-r1|2(8.78).

(a) Show that the change of variables from

r1,r2,tor1,r2,tou12(r1+r2),v12(r1+r2) (8.79).

turns the Hamiltonian into two independent three-dimensional harmonic oscillators:

H=[-ħ2mu2+12mω2u2]+[-ħ2mu2+121-λmω2u2](8.80)

(b) What is the exact ground state energy for this system?

(c) If we didn’t know the exact solution, we might be inclined to apply the method of Section 7.2 to the Hamiltonian in its original form (Equation 7.78). Do so (but don’t bother with shielding). How does your result compare with the exact answer? Answer:(H)=3ħω(1-λ/4)a.

Suppose you’re given a two-level quantum system whose (time-independent) Hamiltonian H0admits just two Eigen states, Ψa (with energy Ea ), and Ψb(with energy Eb ). They are orthogonal, normalized, and non-degenerate (assume Ea is the smaller of the two energies). Now we turn on a perturbation H′, with the following matrix elements:

Ψa|H'|Ψa=Ψb|H'|Ψb=0;Ψa|H'|Ψb=Ψb|H'|Ψa (7.74).

where h is some specified constant.

(a) Find the exact Eigen values of the perturbed Hamiltonian.

(b) Estimate the energies of the perturbed system using second-order perturbation theory.

(c) Estimate the ground state energy of the perturbed system using the variation principle, with a trial function of the form

Ψ=(cosϕ)Ψa+(sinϕ)ψb (7.75).

where ϕ is an adjustable parameter. Note: Writing the linear combination in this way is just a neat way to guarantee that ψ is normalized.

(d) Compare your answers to (a), (b), and (c). Why is the variational principle so accurate, in this case?

If the photon had a nonzero mass mγ0, the Coulomb potential would be replaced by the Yukawa potential,

V(r)=-e24π0e-μrr (8.73).

Whereμ=mγc/ . With a trial wave function of your own devising, estimate the binding energy of a “hydrogen” atom with this potential. Assumeμa1 , and give your answer correct to order(μa)2 .

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free