Find the best bound on Egsfor the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator using a trial wave function of the form role="math" localid="1656044636654" ψ(x)=Ax2+b2.,where A is determined by normalization and b is an adjustable parameter.

Short Answer

Expert verified

It is bigger than the expected value of the ground state energy of the harmonic oscillator=0.707ω

Step by step solution

01

Define the formula for trial wave function

The trial wave function has the form:

ψ(x)=Ax2+b2

The harmonic oscillator potential has the form

V(x)=122x2

02

Step 2: Define the normalization of A.

ψ(x)ψ(x)=-ψ*(x)ψ(x)dx=-A2x2+b22dx=1

We know that x=btanθ

role="math" localid="1656045400533" dx=bsec2θdθ-A2(x2+b2)2dx=20A2(x2+b2)2dx2A2b30cos2θdθ=2A2π4b3=1A=2b3π

03

Step 3: Now find the value of T.

The expectation value of kinetic energy.

T=-22mA2-1(x2+b2)d2dx21(x2+b2)dxd2dx21(x2+b2)=8x2(x2+b2)3-2(x2+b2)2=6x2-2b2(x2+b2)3T=-22m2A206x2-2b2(x2+b2)4dx=24mb2

Now find the value of V expectation potential energy.

V=1222A20x2(x2+b2)2dx=22b3ππ4b=2b22

04

 Step 4: Now find the value of Hamiltonian expectation.

Expectation value H=T+V

=24mb2+2b22

Now minimize H

role="math" localid="1656046908842" Hb=-22mb3+2b=0b=22m2ω214H24m122m2ω2122222m2ω212min=22ω=0.707ω

Which is bigger than the expected value of the ground state energy of the harmonic oscillator=0.707ω

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The fundamental problem in harnessing nuclear fusion is getting the two particles (say, two deuterons) close enough together for the attractive (but short-range) nuclear force to overcome the Coulomb repulsion. The “bulldozer” method is to heat the particles up to fantastic temperatures and allow the random collisions to bring them together. A more exotic proposal is muon catalysis, in which we construct a “hydrogen molecule ion,” only with deuterons in place of protons, and a muon in place of the electron. Predict the equilibrium separation distance between the deuterons in such a structure, and explain why muons are superior to electrons for this purpose.

Using Egs=-79.0eV for the ground state energy of helium, calculate the ionization energy (the energy required to remove just one electron). Hint: First calculate the ground state energy of the helium ion, He+, with a single electron orbiting the nucleus; then subtract the two energies.

InProblem 7.7we found that the trial wave function with shielding (Equation 7.27), which worked well for helium, is inadequate to confirm the existence of a bound state for the negative hydrogen ion.

ψ1(r1,r2)z3πa3e-z(r1+r2)/a (7.27)

Chandrasekhar used a trial wave function of the form

ψ(r1,r2)A[ψ1(r1)ψ2(r2)+ψ2(r1)ψ1(r2)] (7.62).

Where

ψ1(r)z13πa3e-z1/a,ψ1(r)z23πa3e-z2/a,(7.63)

In effect, he allowed two different shielding factors, suggesting that one electron is relatively close to the nucleus, and the other is farther out. (Because electrons are identical particles, the spatial wave function must be symmetries with respect to interchange. The spin state—which is irrelevant to the calculation—is evidently anti symmetric.) Show that by astute choice of the adjustable parameters Z1and Z2you can get<H>less than -13.6.

Answer: :<H>=E1x6+y6(-x8+2x7+12x6y2-12x5y2-18x3y4+118xy6-12y8).

Wherexz1+z2.y2z1z2Chandrasekhar usedZ1=1.039

(Since this is larger than 1, the motivating interpretation as an effective nuclear charge cannot be sustained, but never mindit’s still an acceptable trial wave function) andZ2=0.283.

(a) GeneralizeProblem 7.2, using the trial wave function

ψ(x)=A(x2+b2)n,

For arbitrary n. Partial answer: The best value of b is given by

localid="1658300238725" b2=hmω[n(4n-1)(4n-3)2(2n+1)]1/2

(b) Find the least upper bound on the first excited state of the harmonic oscillator using a trial function of the form

ψ(x)=Bx(x2+b2)n.

Partial answer: The best value of b is given by

localid="1658300555415" b2=hmω[n(4n-5)(4n-3)2(2n+1)]1/2.

(c) Notice that the bounds approach the exact energies as n →∞. Why is that? Hint: Plot the trial wave functions for n = 2 , n = 3 , and n = 4, and compare them with the true wave functions (Equations 2.59 and 2.62). To do it analytically, start with the identity

ez=limn(1+zn)nψ0(x)=(mωπh)1/4e-mω2hx2 (2.59).

ψ1(x)=A1a^+ψ0=A12hmω(-hddx+mωx)(mωπh)1/4e-mω2hx2ψ1(x)=A1(mωπh)1/42mωhxe-mω2hx2(2.62).

Although the Schrödinger equation for helium itself cannot be solved exactly, there exist “helium-like” systems that do admit exact solutions. A simple example is “rubber-band helium,” in which the Coulomb forces are replaced by Hooke’s law forces:

H=-ħ22m(12+22)+12mω2|r1-r1|2(8.78).

(a) Show that the change of variables from

r1,r2,tor1,r2,tou12(r1+r2),v12(r1+r2) (8.79).

turns the Hamiltonian into two independent three-dimensional harmonic oscillators:

H=[-ħ2mu2+12mω2u2]+[-ħ2mu2+121-λmω2u2](8.80)

(b) What is the exact ground state energy for this system?

(c) If we didn’t know the exact solution, we might be inclined to apply the method of Section 7.2 to the Hamiltonian in its original form (Equation 7.78). Do so (but don’t bother with shielding). How does your result compare with the exact answer? Answer:(H)=3ħω(1-λ/4)a.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free