Find the best bound on Egsfor the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator using a trial wave function of the form role="math" localid="1656044636654" ψ(x)=Ax2+b2.,where A is determined by normalization and b is an adjustable parameter.

Short Answer

Expert verified

It is bigger than the expected value of the ground state energy of the harmonic oscillator=0.707ω

Step by step solution

01

Define the formula for trial wave function

The trial wave function has the form:

ψ(x)=Ax2+b2

The harmonic oscillator potential has the form

V(x)=122x2

02

Step 2: Define the normalization of A.

ψ(x)ψ(x)=-ψ*(x)ψ(x)dx=-A2x2+b22dx=1

We know that x=btanθ

role="math" localid="1656045400533" dx=bsec2θdθ-A2(x2+b2)2dx=20A2(x2+b2)2dx2A2b30cos2θdθ=2A2π4b3=1A=2b3π

03

Step 3: Now find the value of T.

The expectation value of kinetic energy.

T=-22mA2-1(x2+b2)d2dx21(x2+b2)dxd2dx21(x2+b2)=8x2(x2+b2)3-2(x2+b2)2=6x2-2b2(x2+b2)3T=-22m2A206x2-2b2(x2+b2)4dx=24mb2

Now find the value of V expectation potential energy.

V=1222A20x2(x2+b2)2dx=22b3ππ4b=2b22

04

 Step 4: Now find the value of Hamiltonian expectation.

Expectation value H=T+V

=24mb2+2b22

Now minimize H

role="math" localid="1656046908842" Hb=-22mb3+2b=0b=22m2ω214H24m122m2ω2122222m2ω212min=22ω=0.707ω

Which is bigger than the expected value of the ground state energy of the harmonic oscillator=0.707ω

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

As an explicit example of the method developed inProblem 7.15, consider an electron at rest in a uniform magnetic field B=B2kfor which the Hamiltonian is (Equation 4.158):

H=-γB (4.158).

H0=eBzmSz (7.57).

The eigenspinors, xaarelocalid="1655969802629" xb,andthecorrespondingenergies,EaandEb,aregiven in Equation 4.161. Now we turn on a perturbation, in the form of a uniform field in the x direction:

{x+,withenergyE+=-γB0ħ/2x-,withenergyE-=+-γB0ħ/2 (4.161).

H'=eBxmSx (7.58).

(a) Find the matrix elements of H′, and confirm that they have the structure of Equation 7.55. What is h?

(b) Using your result inProblem 7.15(b), find the new ground state energy, in second-order perturbation theory.

(c) Using your result inProblem 7.15(c), find the variation principle bound on the ground state energy.

Using Egs=-79.0eV for the ground state energy of helium, calculate the ionization energy (the energy required to remove just one electron). Hint: First calculate the ground state energy of the helium ion, He+, with a single electron orbiting the nucleus; then subtract the two energies.

Suppose you’re given a two-level quantum system whose (time-independent) Hamiltonian H0admits just two Eigen states, Ψa (with energy Ea ), and Ψb(with energy Eb ). They are orthogonal, normalized, and non-degenerate (assume Ea is the smaller of the two energies). Now we turn on a perturbation H′, with the following matrix elements:

Ψa|H'|Ψa=Ψb|H'|Ψb=0;Ψa|H'|Ψb=Ψb|H'|Ψa (7.74).

where h is some specified constant.

(a) Find the exact Eigen values of the perturbed Hamiltonian.

(b) Estimate the energies of the perturbed system using second-order perturbation theory.

(c) Estimate the ground state energy of the perturbed system using the variation principle, with a trial function of the form

Ψ=(cosϕ)Ψa+(sinϕ)ψb (7.75).

where ϕ is an adjustable parameter. Note: Writing the linear combination in this way is just a neat way to guarantee that ψ is normalized.

(d) Compare your answers to (a), (b), and (c). Why is the variational principle so accurate, in this case?

Suppose we used a minus sign in our trial wave function (Equation 7.37):ψ=A[ψ0(r1)-ψ0(r2)]): Without doing any new integrals, find F(x) (the analog to Equation ) for this case, and construct the graph. Show that there is no evidence of bonding. (Since the variational principle only gives an upper bound, this doesn't prove that bonding cannot occur for such a state, but it certainly doesn't look promising). Comment: Actually, any function of the form ψ=A[ψ0(r1)+eiϕψ0(r2)]has the desired property that the electron is equally likely to be associated with either proton. However, since the Hamiltonian (Equation 7.35 ) is invariant under the interchange P:r1r2 , its eigen functions can be chosen to be simultaneously eigen functions of P . The plus sign (Equation 7.37) goes with the eigenvalue +1 , and the minus sign (Equation 7.52 ) with the eigenvalue -1 ; nothing is to be gained by considering the ostensibly more general case (Equation 7.53), though you're welcome to try it, if you're interested.

Although the Schrödinger equation for helium itself cannot be solved exactly, there exist “helium-like” systems that do admit exact solutions. A simple example is “rubber-band helium,” in which the Coulomb forces are replaced by Hooke’s law forces:

H=-ħ22m(12+22)+12mω2|r1-r1|2(8.78).

(a) Show that the change of variables from

r1,r2,tor1,r2,tou12(r1+r2),v12(r1+r2) (8.79).

turns the Hamiltonian into two independent three-dimensional harmonic oscillators:

H=[-ħ2mu2+12mω2u2]+[-ħ2mu2+121-λmω2u2](8.80)

(b) What is the exact ground state energy for this system?

(c) If we didn’t know the exact solution, we might be inclined to apply the method of Section 7.2 to the Hamiltonian in its original form (Equation 7.78). Do so (but don’t bother with shielding). How does your result compare with the exact answer? Answer:(H)=3ħω(1-λ/4)a.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free