a) Use the variational principle to prove that first-order non-degenerate perturbation theory always overestimates (or at any rate never underestimates) the ground state energy.

(b) In view of (a), you would expect that the second-order correction to the ground state is always negative. Confirm that this is indeed the case, by examining Equation 6.15.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) As, ψgs0|H|ψgs0=E0+E1Egsthis proves thatfirst-order non-degenerate perturbation theory overestimates the ground state energy.

(b) The value of Egs2is definitely negative.

Step by step solution

01

Define the variational principle

The variational principle states that the ground-state energy is always smaller than or equal to the calculated with the trial wavefunction expectation value. We can approximate the wave function and energy of the ground-state by changing until the expectation value of is minimized.

Egsψgso|H|ψgso

WhereEgs is the energy in the ground state.

02

Prove the first-order perturbation

(a)

Solve the problem by using ψgso as our trial wave function as:

The variational principle tells us that:

Egsψgso|H|ψgso

Using the perturbation theory as well;

H=H0+H1

Where H1 is the first order perturbation, and His the unperturbed Hamiltonian.

Thus,

ψgs0|H|ψgs0=ψgs0|H|ψgs0+ψgs0|H1|ψgs0ψgs0|H|ψgs0=Egs0ψgs0|H1|ψgs0=Egs1

Then, ψgs0|H|ψgs0=E0+E1Egsand this proves the statement.

03

Define the value of second order correction.

(b)

The ground state's second order correction is denoted by Egs2 and from the second order perturbation theory,

Egs0=mn|ψm0|H1|ψgs0|2En0-Em0

Therefore;

role="math" localid="1658317167106" Egs0=mgs|ψm0|H1|ψgs0|2Egs0-Em0

Since role="math" localid="1658317017097" Egs0 is the ground state,

Then numerator is positive, but the denominator is negative as:

Egs0-Em0<0 for all m.

Thus, role="math" localid="1658316906095" |ψm0|H1|ψgs0|2, Egs2is definitely negative.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a) Use a trial wave function of the form

ψ(x)={Acos(πx/a),if(a/2<x<a/2)0otherwise

to obtain a bound on the ground state energy of the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator. What is the "best" value ofa? CompareHminwith the exact energy. Note: This trial function has a "kink" in it (a discontinuous derivative) at±a/2; do you need to take account of this, as I did in Example 7.3?

(b) Useψ(x)=Bsin(πx/a)on the interval(a,a)to obtain a bound on the first excited state. Compare the exact answer.

Suppose you’re given a two-level quantum system whose (time-independent) Hamiltonian H0admits just two Eigen states, Ψa (with energy Ea ), and Ψb(with energy Eb ). They are orthogonal, normalized, and non-degenerate (assume Ea is the smaller of the two energies). Now we turn on a perturbation H′, with the following matrix elements:

Ψa|H'|Ψa=Ψb|H'|Ψb=0;Ψa|H'|Ψb=Ψb|H'|Ψa (7.74).

where h is some specified constant.

(a) Find the exact Eigen values of the perturbed Hamiltonian.

(b) Estimate the energies of the perturbed system using second-order perturbation theory.

(c) Estimate the ground state energy of the perturbed system using the variation principle, with a trial function of the form

Ψ=(cosϕ)Ψa+(sinϕ)ψb (7.75).

where ϕ is an adjustable parameter. Note: Writing the linear combination in this way is just a neat way to guarantee that ψ is normalized.

(d) Compare your answers to (a), (b), and (c). Why is the variational principle so accurate, in this case?

Using Egs=-79.0eV for the ground state energy of helium, calculate the ionization energy (the energy required to remove just one electron). Hint: First calculate the ground state energy of the helium ion, He+, with a single electron orbiting the nucleus; then subtract the two energies.

(a) Prove the following corollary to the variational principle: If ψψgs=0thenáHñEfe whereEfe is the energy of the first excited state. Comment: If we can find a trial function that is orthogonal to the exact ground state, we can get an upper bound on the first excited state. In general, it's difficult to be sure that is orthogonal toψgsi since (presumably) we don't know the latter. However, if the potentialV(x) is an even function of x, then the ground state is likewise even, and hence any odd trial function will automatically meet the condition for the corollary.

(b) Find the best bound on the first excited state of the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator using the trial functionψ(x)=Axe-bx2

InProblem 7.7we found that the trial wave function with shielding (Equation 7.27), which worked well for helium, is inadequate to confirm the existence of a bound state for the negative hydrogen ion.

ψ1(r1,r2)z3πa3e-z(r1+r2)/a (7.27)

Chandrasekhar used a trial wave function of the form

ψ(r1,r2)A[ψ1(r1)ψ2(r2)+ψ2(r1)ψ1(r2)] (7.62).

Where

ψ1(r)z13πa3e-z1/a,ψ1(r)z23πa3e-z2/a,(7.63)

In effect, he allowed two different shielding factors, suggesting that one electron is relatively close to the nucleus, and the other is farther out. (Because electrons are identical particles, the spatial wave function must be symmetries with respect to interchange. The spin state—which is irrelevant to the calculation—is evidently anti symmetric.) Show that by astute choice of the adjustable parameters Z1and Z2you can get<H>less than -13.6.

Answer: :<H>=E1x6+y6(-x8+2x7+12x6y2-12x5y2-18x3y4+118xy6-12y8).

Wherexz1+z2.y2z1z2Chandrasekhar usedZ1=1.039

(Since this is larger than 1, the motivating interpretation as an effective nuclear charge cannot be sustained, but never mindit’s still an acceptable trial wave function) andZ2=0.283.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free