Suppose we used a minus sign in our trial wave function (Equation 7.37):ψ=A[ψ0(r1)-ψ0(r2)]): Without doing any new integrals, find F(x) (the analog to Equation ) for this case, and construct the graph. Show that there is no evidence of bonding. (Since the variational principle only gives an upper bound, this doesn't prove that bonding cannot occur for such a state, but it certainly doesn't look promising). Comment: Actually, any function of the form ψ=A[ψ0(r1)+eiϕψ0(r2)]has the desired property that the electron is equally likely to be associated with either proton. However, since the Hamiltonian (Equation 7.35 ) is invariant under the interchange P:r1r2 , its eigen functions can be chosen to be simultaneously eigen functions of P . The plus sign (Equation 7.37) goes with the eigenvalue +1 , and the minus sign (Equation 7.52 ) with the eigenvalue -1 ; nothing is to be gained by considering the ostensibly more general case (Equation 7.53), though you're welcome to try it, if you're interested.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The value ofF(x)=-E1-1+2x(1+x)e-2x+2x23-1e-x1-e-x1+x+x23

Step by step solution

01

The two equations

Equation 7.43 gives the normalization factor as,

|A|2=12(1+I)where I is overlap integral which determines the amount by which ψ0(r1)overlaps ψ0(r2).

Equation 7.44 gives the expectation value of H in the trial stateψ ,

role="math" localid="1658377951717" H=E1-2|A|2e24πϵ0ψ0(r1)1r2/r2|ψ0(r1)+ψ0(r1)1r1ψ0(r2)

02

Definition of integral

An integral is a number that is assigned to a function in order to explain displacement, area, volume, and other notions that occur when infinitesimal data is combined.

Integration is the term used to describe the process of locating integrals.

03

The value of  F(x)

Consider that,

ψ=A[ψ0(r1)-ψ0(r2)]

Two things that change sign are - integral I from Equation 7.43 and sign inside the parenthesis in the Equation 7.44 . So,

role="math" localid="1658378005528" |A|2=12(1+I)H=E1-2|A|2e24πϵ0ψ0(r1)1r2/r2|ψ0(r1)+ψ0(r1)1r1ψ0(r2)

The Equation 7.49 now becomes:

H=1+2D-X1-IE1

04

Adding repulsion

Add proton-proton repulsionVpp in order to get total energyF(x), wherex=R/a:

F(x)=E1+3E11-e-x1+x+x231x-1+1xe-2x-1+xe-x-2xE1=-E1-1+2x-2x1-1+xe-2x-x+x2e-x1-e-x1+x+x23=-E1-1+2x1-e-x1+x+x23-1+1+xe-2x+x+x2e-x1-e-x1+x+x23=-E1-1+2x1+xe-2x+2x23-1e-x1-e-x1+x+x23

In the graph below, this function is represented by a black line.

The Equation 7.51has a bound state, as shown by the blue line.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

a) Use the variational principle to prove that first-order non-degenerate perturbation theory always overestimates (or at any rate never underestimates) the ground state energy.

(b) In view of (a), you would expect that the second-order correction to the ground state is always negative. Confirm that this is indeed the case, by examining Equation 6.15.

If the photon had a nonzero mass mγ0, the Coulomb potential would be replaced by the Yukawa potential,

V(r)=-e24π0e-μrr (8.73).

Whereμ=mγc/ . With a trial wave function of your own devising, estimate the binding energy of a “hydrogen” atom with this potential. Assumeμa1 , and give your answer correct to order(μa)2 .

Using Egs=-79.0eV for the ground state energy of helium, calculate the ionization energy (the energy required to remove just one electron). Hint: First calculate the ground state energy of the helium ion, He+, with a single electron orbiting the nucleus; then subtract the two energies.

(a) Prove the following corollary to the variational principle: If ψψgs=0thenáHñEfe whereEfe is the energy of the first excited state. Comment: If we can find a trial function that is orthogonal to the exact ground state, we can get an upper bound on the first excited state. In general, it's difficult to be sure that is orthogonal toψgsi since (presumably) we don't know the latter. However, if the potentialV(x) is an even function of x, then the ground state is likewise even, and hence any odd trial function will automatically meet the condition for the corollary.

(b) Find the best bound on the first excited state of the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator using the trial functionψ(x)=Axe-bx2

Suppose you’re given a two-level quantum system whose (time-independent) Hamiltonian H0admits just two Eigen states, Ψa (with energy Ea ), and Ψb(with energy Eb ). They are orthogonal, normalized, and non-degenerate (assume Ea is the smaller of the two energies). Now we turn on a perturbation H′, with the following matrix elements:

Ψa|H'|Ψa=Ψb|H'|Ψb=0;Ψa|H'|Ψb=Ψb|H'|Ψa (7.74).

where h is some specified constant.

(a) Find the exact Eigen values of the perturbed Hamiltonian.

(b) Estimate the energies of the perturbed system using second-order perturbation theory.

(c) Estimate the ground state energy of the perturbed system using the variation principle, with a trial function of the form

Ψ=(cosϕ)Ψa+(sinϕ)ψb (7.75).

where ϕ is an adjustable parameter. Note: Writing the linear combination in this way is just a neat way to guarantee that ψ is normalized.

(d) Compare your answers to (a), (b), and (c). Why is the variational principle so accurate, in this case?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free