Suppose we used a minus sign in our trial wave function (Equation 7.37):ψ=A[ψ0(r1)-ψ0(r2)]): Without doing any new integrals, find F(x) (the analog to Equation ) for this case, and construct the graph. Show that there is no evidence of bonding. (Since the variational principle only gives an upper bound, this doesn't prove that bonding cannot occur for such a state, but it certainly doesn't look promising). Comment: Actually, any function of the form ψ=A[ψ0(r1)+eiϕψ0(r2)]has the desired property that the electron is equally likely to be associated with either proton. However, since the Hamiltonian (Equation 7.35 ) is invariant under the interchange P:r1r2 , its eigen functions can be chosen to be simultaneously eigen functions of P . The plus sign (Equation 7.37) goes with the eigenvalue +1 , and the minus sign (Equation 7.52 ) with the eigenvalue -1 ; nothing is to be gained by considering the ostensibly more general case (Equation 7.53), though you're welcome to try it, if you're interested.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The value ofF(x)=-E1-1+2x(1+x)e-2x+2x23-1e-x1-e-x1+x+x23

Step by step solution

01

The two equations

Equation 7.43 gives the normalization factor as,

|A|2=12(1+I)where I is overlap integral which determines the amount by which ψ0(r1)overlaps ψ0(r2).

Equation 7.44 gives the expectation value of H in the trial stateψ ,

role="math" localid="1658377951717" H=E1-2|A|2e24πϵ0ψ0(r1)1r2/r2|ψ0(r1)+ψ0(r1)1r1ψ0(r2)

02

Definition of integral

An integral is a number that is assigned to a function in order to explain displacement, area, volume, and other notions that occur when infinitesimal data is combined.

Integration is the term used to describe the process of locating integrals.

03

The value of  F(x)

Consider that,

ψ=A[ψ0(r1)-ψ0(r2)]

Two things that change sign are - integral I from Equation 7.43 and sign inside the parenthesis in the Equation 7.44 . So,

role="math" localid="1658378005528" |A|2=12(1+I)H=E1-2|A|2e24πϵ0ψ0(r1)1r2/r2|ψ0(r1)+ψ0(r1)1r1ψ0(r2)

The Equation 7.49 now becomes:

H=1+2D-X1-IE1

04

Adding repulsion

Add proton-proton repulsionVpp in order to get total energyF(x), wherex=R/a:

F(x)=E1+3E11-e-x1+x+x231x-1+1xe-2x-1+xe-x-2xE1=-E1-1+2x-2x1-1+xe-2x-x+x2e-x1-e-x1+x+x23=-E1-1+2x1-e-x1+x+x23-1+1+xe-2x+x+x2e-x1-e-x1+x+x23=-E1-1+2x1+xe-2x+2x23-1e-x1-e-x1+x+x23

In the graph below, this function is represented by a black line.

The Equation 7.51has a bound state, as shown by the blue line.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a) Use a trial wave function of the form

ψ(x)={Acos(πx/a),if(a/2<x<a/2)0otherwise

to obtain a bound on the ground state energy of the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator. What is the "best" value ofa? CompareHminwith the exact energy. Note: This trial function has a "kink" in it (a discontinuous derivative) at±a/2; do you need to take account of this, as I did in Example 7.3?

(b) Useψ(x)=Bsin(πx/a)on the interval(a,a)to obtain a bound on the first excited state. Compare the exact answer.

Suppose you’re given a two-level quantum system whose (time-independent) Hamiltonian H0admits just two Eigen states, Ψa (with energy Ea ), and Ψb(with energy Eb ). They are orthogonal, normalized, and non-degenerate (assume Ea is the smaller of the two energies). Now we turn on a perturbation H′, with the following matrix elements:

Ψa|H'|Ψa=Ψb|H'|Ψb=0;Ψa|H'|Ψb=Ψb|H'|Ψa (7.74).

where h is some specified constant.

(a) Find the exact Eigen values of the perturbed Hamiltonian.

(b) Estimate the energies of the perturbed system using second-order perturbation theory.

(c) Estimate the ground state energy of the perturbed system using the variation principle, with a trial function of the form

Ψ=(cosϕ)Ψa+(sinϕ)ψb (7.75).

where ϕ is an adjustable parameter. Note: Writing the linear combination in this way is just a neat way to guarantee that ψ is normalized.

(d) Compare your answers to (a), (b), and (c). Why is the variational principle so accurate, in this case?

Find the best bound on Egsfor the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator using a trial wave function of the form role="math" localid="1656044636654" ψ(x)=Ax2+b2.,where A is determined by normalization and b is an adjustable parameter.

InProblem 7.7we found that the trial wave function with shielding (Equation 7.27), which worked well for helium, is inadequate to confirm the existence of a bound state for the negative hydrogen ion.

ψ1(r1,r2)z3πa3e-z(r1+r2)/a (7.27)

Chandrasekhar used a trial wave function of the form

ψ(r1,r2)A[ψ1(r1)ψ2(r2)+ψ2(r1)ψ1(r2)] (7.62).

Where

ψ1(r)z13πa3e-z1/a,ψ1(r)z23πa3e-z2/a,(7.63)

In effect, he allowed two different shielding factors, suggesting that one electron is relatively close to the nucleus, and the other is farther out. (Because electrons are identical particles, the spatial wave function must be symmetries with respect to interchange. The spin state—which is irrelevant to the calculation—is evidently anti symmetric.) Show that by astute choice of the adjustable parameters Z1and Z2you can get<H>less than -13.6.

Answer: :<H>=E1x6+y6(-x8+2x7+12x6y2-12x5y2-18x3y4+118xy6-12y8).

Wherexz1+z2.y2z1z2Chandrasekhar usedZ1=1.039

(Since this is larger than 1, the motivating interpretation as an effective nuclear charge cannot be sustained, but never mindit’s still an acceptable trial wave function) andZ2=0.283.

The fundamental problem in harnessing nuclear fusion is getting the two particles (say, two deuterons) close enough together for the attractive (but short-range) nuclear force to overcome the Coulomb repulsion. The “bulldozer” method is to heat the particles up to fantastic temperatures and allow the random collisions to bring them together. A more exotic proposal is muon catalysis, in which we construct a “hydrogen molecule ion,” only with deuterons in place of protons, and a muon in place of the electron. Predict the equilibrium separation distance between the deuterons in such a structure, and explain why muons are superior to electrons for this purpose.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free