Prove the commutation relation in Equation 9.74. Hint: First show that

[L2,z]=2ih(xLy-yLx-ihz)

Use this, and the fact that localid="1657963185161" r.L=r.(r×p)=0, to demonstrate that

[L2,[L2,z]]=2h2(zL2+L2z)

The generalization from z to r is trivial.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The communication relation in Equation 9.74 is[L2,[L2,z]]=2h2(zL2+L2z)

Step by step solution

01

Definition of commutation relation

Fundamental quantum mechanical relationships that link successive operations on the wave function or state vector of two operators (L1 and L2) in opposing orders, i.e., L1 L2 and L2 L1. The operators' algebra is defined by the commutation relations.

02

Proving the commutation relation in Equation 9.74.

[L2,z]=[Lx2,z]+[Ly2,z]+[Lz2,z]=Lx[Lx,z]+[Lx,z]Lx+Ly[Ly,z]+[Ly,z]Ly+Lz[Lz,z]+[Lz,z]Lz.

But{[Lx,z]=[ypzzpy,z]=[ypz,z][zpy,z]=y[pz,z]=iy[Ly,z]=[zpxxpz,z]=[zpx,z][xpz,z]=x[pz,z]=ix[Lz,z]=[xpyypx,z]=[xpy,z][ypx,z]=0

So:   [L2,z]=Lx(iy)+(iy)Lx+Ly(ix)+(ix)Ly=i(LxyyLx+Lyx+xLy).

But{Lxy=LxyyLx+yLx=[Lx,y]+yLx=iz+yLxLyx=LyxxLy+xLy=[Ly,x]+xLy=iz+xLy

So:[L2,z]=i(2xLyiz2yLxiz)[L2,z]=2i(xLyyLxiz)[L2,[L2,z]]=2i{[L2,xLy][L2,yLx]i[L2,z]}=2i{[L2,x]Ly+x[L2,Ly][L2,y]Lxy[L2,Lx]i(L2zzL2)}[L2,Ly]=[L2,Lx]=0

so,

[L2,Lx]=0,   [L2,Ly]=0,   [L2,Lz]=0(4.102).

[L2,[L2,z]]=2i{2i(yLzzLyix)Ly2i(zLxxLziy)Lxi(L2zzL2)}[L2,[L2,z]]=2i,or[L2,[L2,z]]=22(2yLzLy2zLy22zLx22z(Lx2+Ly2+Lz2)+2zLz22ixLy+2xLzLx+2iyLxL2z+z

=22(2yLzLy2ixLy+2xLzLx+2iyLx+2zLz22zL2L2z+zL2)=22(zL2+L2z)42[(yLzix)LzyLy+(xLz+iy)LzxLx+zLzLz]=22(zL2+L2z)42(LzyLy+LzxLx+LzzLz)Lz(rL)=0=22(zL2+L2z)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

We have encountered stimulated emission, (stimulated) absorption, and spontaneous emission. How come there is no such thing as spontaneous absorption?

Suppose you don’t assumeH'aa=H'aa=0

(a) Findca(t)andcb(t)in first-order perturbation theory, for the case

ce(0)=1,cb(0)=0.show that |ca(1)(t)|2+|cb(1)(t)|2=1, to first order inH^' .

(b) There is a nicer way to handle this problem. Let

daeih0tHaac(tc)dtc0ca,dbei20tHbbc(tc)dtc0cb.

Show that

role="math" localid="1658561855290" d-a=-iheiϕH'abe-iω0tdb;db-=-iheiϕH'bae-iω0tda

where

ϕ(t)1h0l[H'aa(t')-H'bb(t')]dt'.

So the equations fordaanddbare identical in structure to Equation 11.17 (with an extra role="math" localid="1658562498216" eiϕtackedontoH^')

ca-=-ihH'abe-iω0tcb,cb-=-ihH'baeiω0tca

(c) Use the method in part (b) to obtainrole="math" localid="1658562468835" ca(t)andcb(t)in first-order
perturbation theory, and compare your answer to (a). Comment on any discrepancies.

In Equation 9.31 assumed that the atom is so small (in comparison to the wavelength of light) that spatial variations in the field can be ignored. The true electric field would be E(r,t)=E0cos(krωt).

If the atom is centered at the origin, thenkr1 over the relevant volume,|k|=2π/λ sokr~r/λ1) and that's why we could afford to drop this term. Suppose we keep the first-order correction:

E(r,t)=E0[cos(ωt)+(kr)sin(ωt)].

The first term gives rise to the allowed (electric dipole) transitions we considered in the text; the second leads to so-called forbidden (magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole) transitions (higher powers of k.rlead to even more "forbidden" transitions, associated with higher multipole moments).

(a) Obtain the spontaneous emission rate for forbidden transitions (don't bother to average over polarization and propagation directions, though this should really be done to complete the calculation). Answer:role="math" localid="1659008133999" Rba=q2ω5πϵ0c5|a|(n^r)(k^r)|b|2.

(b) Show that for a one-dimensional oscillator the forbidden transitions go from leveln to levelrole="math" localid="1659008239387" n-2 and the transition rate (suitably averaged over n^andk^) isR=q2ω3n(n1)15πϵ0m2c5.

(Note: Hereω is the frequency of the photon, not the oscillator.) Find the ratio of the "forbidden" rate to the "allowed" rate, and comment on the terminology.

(c) Show that the2S1S transition in hydrogen is not possible even by a "forbidden" transition. (As it turns out, this is true for all the higher multipoles as well; the dominant decay is in fact by two-photon emission, and the lifetime it is about a tenth of a second

Calculate the lifetime (in seconds) for each of the four n = 2 states of hydrogen. Hint: You’ll need to evaluate matrix elements of the form <ψ100xψ200>,<ψ100yψ211>, and so on. Remember that role="math" localid="1658303993600" x=rsinθcosϕ,y=rsinθsinϕandz=rcosθ. Most of these integrals are zero, so inspect them closely before you start calculating. Answer: 1.60×10-9seconds for all except role="math" localid="1658304185040" ψ200, which is infinite.

A particle of mass m is initially in the ground state of the (one-dimensional) infinite square well. At time t = 0 a “brick” is dropped into the well, so that the potential becomes

V(x)={V0,0xa/20,a/2<xa;,otherwise

where V0E1After a time T, the brick is removed, and the energy of the particle is measured. Find the probability (in first-order perturbation theory) that the result is nowE2 .

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free