A particle starts out (at time t=0 ) in the Nth state of the infinite square well. Now the “floor” of the well rises temporarily (maybe water leaks in, and then drains out again), so that the potential inside is uniform but time dependent:V0(t),withV0(0)=V0(T)=0.

(a) Solve for the exact cm(t), using Equation 11.116, and show that the wave function changes phase, but no transitions occur. Find the phase change, role="math" localid="1658378247097" ϕ(T), in terms of the function V0(t)

(b) Analyze the same problem in first-order perturbation theory, and compare your answers. Compare your answers.
Comment: The same result holds whenever the perturbation simply adds a constant (constant in x, that is, not in to the potential; it has nothing to do with the infinite square well, as such. Compare Problem 1.8.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a)cmt2=cm02,andtherearenotransitions.ΦT=-1ħ0TV0tdt

(b)By the First-Order perturbation theory

cNt=eiΦt,cmt=0

Step by step solution

01

Step 1: First-Order perturbation theory

The first-Order perturbation equation includes all the terms in the Schrodinger equation Hψ=Eψthat represent the first order approximations to H,ψ,E,This equation can be obtained by truncating H,ψ,E,after the first order terms.

02

Step 2: (a) Solving for 

Equation 9.82

c˙m=-iħncnH'mneiEm-Ent/ħ

Here,

H'mn=ψmVotψn=δmnV0tc˙m=-iħncnH'mneiEm-Ent/ħc˙m=-iħcmV0t;dcmcm=-iħV0tdtIncm=-iħV0t'dt'+constantccmt=cm0e-iħ0tV0t'dt'

……. (11.116)

.Let,

Φt=-1ħ0tV0t'dt;cmt=eiΦcm0

Hence,

cmt2=cm02,andtherearenotransitions.ΦT=-1ħ0TV0tdt

03

Step 3: (b) Analyzing the problem in the first order perturbation theory

cNt1-iħ0tV0t'dt=1+iΦcmt=-iħ0tδmNV0t'eiEm-ENt'/ħdt=0mNcmt-iħ0tH'mNt'eiEm-ENt'/ħdt',(mN)

The exact answer is cNt=eiΦt,cmt=0, and they are consistent since, eiΦ1+i to first order.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose the perturbation takes the form of a delta function (in time):

H^'=U^δ(t);

Assume thatUaa=Ubb=0,andletUab=Uba+=αif ca(-)=1and cb(-)=0,

find ca(t)andcb(t),and check that lc(t)l2+lcb(t)l2=1. What is the net probability(Pabfort) that a transition occurs? Hint: You might want to treat the delta function as the limit of a sequence of rectangles.

Answer:Pab=sin2(|α|lh)

Suppose you don’t assume Haa=Hbb=0

(a) Find ca(t)and cb(t) in first-order perturbation theory, for the case

.show that , to first order in .

(b) There is a nicer way to handle this problem. Let

.

Show that

where

So the equations for are identical in structure to Equation 11.17 (with an extra

(c) Use the method in part (b) to obtain in first-order
perturbation theory, and compare your answer to (a). Comment on any discrepancies.

Solve Equation 9.13 for the case of a time-independent perturbation, assumingthatandcheck that

. Comment: Ostensibly, this system oscillates between “” Doesn’t this contradict my general assertion that no transitions occur for time-independent perturbations? No, but the reason is rather subtle: In this are not, and never were, Eigen states of the Hamiltonian—a measurement of the energy never yields. In time-dependent perturbation theory we typically contemplate turning on the perturbation for a while, and then turning it off again, in order to examine the system. At the beginning, and at the end,are Eigen states of the exact Hamiltonian, and only in this context does it make sense to say that the system underwent a transition from one to the other. For the present problem, then, assume that the perturbation was turned on at time t = 0, and off again at time T —this doesn’t affect the calculations, but it allows for a more sensible interpretation of the result.

ca=-ihHabeigtcb,cb=-ihHbaeigtca …(9.13).

Prove the commutation relation in Equation 9.74. Hint: First show that

[L2,z]=2ih(xLy-yLx-ihz)

Use this, and the fact that localid="1657963185161" r.L=r.(r×p)=0, to demonstrate that

[L2,[L2,z]]=2h2(zL2+L2z)

The generalization from z to r is trivial.

Solve Equation 9.13 to second order in perturbation theory, for the general case ca(0)=a,cb(0)=bca=-ihH'abe-0tcb,cb=-ihH'bae-0tca

(9.13).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free