Chapter 9: Q4P (page 345)
Suppose you don’t assume
(a) Findin first-order perturbation theory, for the case
.show that , to first order in .
(b) There is a nicer way to handle this problem. Let
.
Show that
role="math" localid="1658561855290"
where
.
So the equations forare identical in structure to Equation 11.17 (with an extra role="math" localid="1658562498216" )
(c) Use the method in part (b) to obtainrole="math" localid="1658562468835" in first-order
perturbation theory, and compare your answer to (a). Comment on any discrepancies.