Calculate ca(t)andcb(t), to second order, for a time-independent perturbation in Problem 9.2. Compare your answer with the exact result.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The formula agree up to second order.

cat=1-Hab2ω0h2-it+1ω01-eiω0t=1+1ω0h2Hab2-it+1ω0eiω0t-1cat=1-2Hbaih2ω0eiω0t/2sinω0t/2=1-2Hbaih2ω0eiω0t/212ieω0t/2-eω0t/2=-Hbahω0eω0t/2-1

Step by step solution

01

Concept used

Consider a time dependent potential, we can solve the Schrodinger equation for this potential in a two state system if we split the Hamiltonian into a time independent partH0 and time dependent partH1, that is:

H=H0+H1

This is done in the section 9.1 to get the solution of:

ψx,t=catψxe-Eat/h+cbtψbxe-Eat/h

02

Calculating  to second order for the perturbation theory

For H′ independent of t,cb2(t)andcb1(t)=-ihHba0te0tdt'

localid="1658396453751" cb2t=-ihHbae0t00t=-Hbahω0e0t-1dca1dt=0ca1t=1

dca1dt=-ihHbaeiω0tcb1=-ih0tHbat'eiω0tdt

Meanwhile

localid="1658397606335" cb2t=1-ih2Hba20teiω0teiω0tdt'dt=1-ih2Hba21iω00t1-eiω0tdt

=1+iω0h2Hab2t=e-iω0tiω00t=1+iω0h2Hab2t+iω0e-iω0t-1

dca2dt=-ihHabeiω0t-ih0tHbat'eiω0tdt

ca2t=1-ih20tHabt'e0t0tHbat'e0tdt'dt

.

For comparison with the exact answers , note first that cbtis already first order (because of the Hbain front), whereas differs from ω0only in second order, so it suffices to replaceωω0in the exact formula to get the second-order result:

localid="1658403529843" cbt2Hbaihω0eiω0t/2siniω0t/2=2Hbaihω0eω0t/212ieiω0t/2-eiω0t/2=-Hbahω0eiω0t-1

in agreement with the result above.

Checkingis more difficult. Note that

ω=ω01+4Hab2ω02h2ω01+2Hab2ω02h2=ω0+2Hab2ω02h2;ω0ω1-2Hab2ω02h2

Taylor expansion:

cosx+o=cosx-osinxcosωt/2=cosω0t2+Hab2ω0h2cosω0t/2-Hab2tω0h2sinω0t/2sinx+o=sinx-sinxocosωt/2=sinω0t2+Hab2ω0h2sinω0t/2-Hab2tω0h2cosω0t/2

localid="1658402491191" cate-iω0t/2cosω0t2-Hab2tω0h2sinω0t2+i1-2Hab2ω0h2sinω0t2+Hab2tω0h2cosω0t2=e-iω0t/2e-iω0t/2-Hab2tω0h2iteiω0t/2+2iω012ieiω0t/2-eiω0t/2

=1-Hab2ω0h2-it+1ω01-eiω0t=1-Hab2ω0h2-it+1ω01-eiω0t,asabove

,asabove.

Thus the formula agree up to second order.

cat2Hbaihω0eiω0t/2siniω0t/2=2Hbaihω0eω0t/212ieiω0t/2-eiω0t/2=-Hbahω0eiω0t-1cbt2Hbaihω0eiω0t/2siniω0t/2=2Hbaihω0eω0t/212ieiω0t/2-eiω0t/2=-Hbahω0eiω0t-1

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For the examples inProblem 11.24(c) and (d), calculate cm(t)to first order. Check the normalization condition:

m|cmt|2=1,

and comment on any discrepancy. Suppose you wanted to calculate the probability of remaining in the original state ψN ; would you do better to use |cNt|2,or1-mN|cmt|2 ?

A particle starts out (at time t=0 ) in the Nth state of the infinite square well. Now the “floor” of the well rises temporarily (maybe water leaks in, and then drains out again), so that the potential inside is uniform but time dependent:V0(t),withV0(0)=V0(T)=0.

(a) Solve for the exact cm(t), using Equation 11.116, and show that the wave function changes phase, but no transitions occur. Find the phase change, role="math" localid="1658378247097" ϕ(T), in terms of the function V0(t)

(b) Analyze the same problem in first-order perturbation theory, and compare your answers. Compare your answers.
Comment: The same result holds whenever the perturbation simply adds a constant (constant in x, that is, not in to the potential; it has nothing to do with the infinite square well, as such. Compare Problem 1.8.

Show that the spontaneous emission rate (Equation 9.56) for a transition from n,lton',l' in hydrogen is

e2ω2l23πo0hc3˙×{l+12l+1ifl'=l+1l2l-1ifl'=l-1

where

l=0r3Rnl(r)Rn'J'(r)dr

(The atom starts out with a specific value of m, and it goes toamyof the state’s mconsistent with the selection rules:m'=m+1,m or m -1 . Notice that the answer is independent of m .) Hint: First calculate all the nonzero matrix elements of x,y,and z between role="math" localid="1658313179553" |n|m>andn'l'm'>for the case . From these, determine the quantity

|n'.1+1.m+1rn|m|2+|n'.1+1,mr|nm|2+|n'.1+1,m-1r|nm|2

Then do the same forl'=l-1.

Suppose the perturbation takes the form of a delta function (in time):

H^'=U^δ(t);

Assume thatUaa=Ubb=0,andletUab=Uba+=αif ca(-)=1and cb(-)=0,

find ca(t)andcb(t),and check that lc(t)l2+lcb(t)l2=1. What is the net probability(Pabfort) that a transition occurs? Hint: You might want to treat the delta function as the limit of a sequence of rectangles.

Answer:Pab=sin2(|α|lh)

In Equation 9.31 assumed that the atom is so small (in comparison to the wavelength of light) that spatial variations in the field can be ignored. The true electric field would be E(r,t)=E0cos(krωt).

If the atom is centered at the origin, thenkr1 over the relevant volume,|k|=2π/λ sokr~r/λ1) and that's why we could afford to drop this term. Suppose we keep the first-order correction:

E(r,t)=E0[cos(ωt)+(kr)sin(ωt)].

The first term gives rise to the allowed (electric dipole) transitions we considered in the text; the second leads to so-called forbidden (magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole) transitions (higher powers of k.rlead to even more "forbidden" transitions, associated with higher multipole moments).

(a) Obtain the spontaneous emission rate for forbidden transitions (don't bother to average over polarization and propagation directions, though this should really be done to complete the calculation). Answer:role="math" localid="1659008133999" Rba=q2ω5πϵ0c5|a|(n^r)(k^r)|b|2.

(b) Show that for a one-dimensional oscillator the forbidden transitions go from leveln to levelrole="math" localid="1659008239387" n-2 and the transition rate (suitably averaged over n^andk^) isR=q2ω3n(n1)15πϵ0m2c5.

(Note: Hereω is the frequency of the photon, not the oscillator.) Find the ratio of the "forbidden" rate to the "allowed" rate, and comment on the terminology.

(c) Show that the2S1S transition in hydrogen is not possible even by a "forbidden" transition. (As it turns out, this is true for all the higher multipoles as well; the dominant decay is in fact by two-photon emission, and the lifetime it is about a tenth of a second

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free