As a mechanism for downward transitions, spontaneous emission competes with thermally stimulated emission (stimulated emission for which blackbody radiation is the source). Show that at room temperature (T = 300 K) thermal stimulation dominates for frequencies well below 5×1012Hz , whereas spontaneous emission dominates for frequencies well above . Which mechanism dominates for visible light?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The spontaneous emission dominates.

Step by step solution

01

Formula for the spontaneous emission rate

The spontaneous emission rate is given by:

A=ω323πo0hc3

The thermally stimulated emission rate is given by:

role="math" localid="1658378927515" R=π3o0h22ρω

where:

ρω=hπ2c3ω3ehω/kBT-1

The ratio of the spontaneous emission rate to the thermally stimulated emission rate is,

AR=ω323πo0hc3.3πo0h2π2.π2c3ehω/KBT-1hω3=ehω/KBT-1

02

Find out the result

Seek the point at which the ratio is, that is:

1=ehω/KBT-1ehω/KBT-2hωkBT=In2ω=kBThIn2

The frequency is,

v=ω2π=kBThIn2

At room temperature, we get:

v=1.38×10-23J/k300k6.63×10-34J.s=4.33×1012Hz

For a frequency higher than this frequency the spontaneous emission dominates, note that higher frequencies than this one includes the visible light.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Calculate ca(t)andcb(t), to second order, for a time-independent perturbation in Problem 9.2. Compare your answer with the exact result.

Suppose you don’t assumeH'aa=H'aa=0

(a) Findca(t)andcb(t)in first-order perturbation theory, for the case

ce(0)=1,cb(0)=0.show that |ca(1)(t)|2+|cb(1)(t)|2=1, to first order inH^' .

(b) There is a nicer way to handle this problem. Let

daeih0tHaac(tc)dtc0ca,dbei20tHbbc(tc)dtc0cb.

Show that

role="math" localid="1658561855290" d-a=-iheiϕH'abe-iω0tdb;db-=-iheiϕH'bae-iω0tda

where

ϕ(t)1h0l[H'aa(t')-H'bb(t')]dt'.

So the equations fordaanddbare identical in structure to Equation 11.17 (with an extra role="math" localid="1658562498216" eiϕtackedontoH^')

ca-=-ihH'abe-iω0tcb,cb-=-ihH'baeiω0tca

(c) Use the method in part (b) to obtainrole="math" localid="1658562468835" ca(t)andcb(t)in first-order
perturbation theory, and compare your answer to (a). Comment on any discrepancies.

We have encountered stimulated emission, (stimulated) absorption, and spontaneous emission. How come there is no such thing as spontaneous absorption?

A particle of mass m is initially in the ground state of the (one-dimensional) infinite square well. At time t = 0 a “brick” is dropped into the well, so that the potential becomes

V(x)={V0,0xa/20,a/2<xa;,otherwise

where V0E1After a time T, the brick is removed, and the energy of the particle is measured. Find the probability (in first-order perturbation theory) that the result is nowE2 .

The first term in Equation 9.25 comes from the eiωt/2, and the second from e-iωt/2.. Thus dropping the first term is formally equivalent to writing H^=(V/2)e-iωt, which is to say,

cbl-ihvba0tcos(ωt')eiω0t'dt'=-iVba2h0tej(ω0+ω)t'+ej(ω0-ω)t'dt'=--iVba2hej(ω0+ω)t'-1ω0+ω+ej(ω0-ω)t'-1ω0-ω(9.25).Hba'=Vba2e-iωt,Hab'=Vab2eiωt(9.29).

(The latter is required to make the Hamiltonian matrix hermitian—or, if you prefer, to pick out the dominant term in the formula analogous to Equation 9.25 forca(t). ) Rabi noticed that if you make this so-called rotating wave approximation at the beginning of the calculation, Equation 9.13 can be solved exactly, with no need for perturbation theory, and no assumption about the strength of the field.

c.a=-ihHab'e-iω0tcb,c.b=-ihHba'e-iω0tca,

(a) Solve Equation 9.13 in the rotating wave approximation (Equation 9.29), for the usual initial conditions: ca(0)=1,cb(0)=0. Express your results (ca(t)andcb(t))in terms of the Rabi flopping frequency,

ωr=12(ω-ω0)2+(Vab/h)2 (9.30).

(b) Determine the transition probability,Pab(t), and show that it never exceeds 1. Confirm that.

ca(t)2+cb(t)2=1.

(c) Check that Pab(t)reduces to the perturbation theory result (Equation 9.28) when the perturbation is “small,” and state precisely what small means in this context, as a constraint on V.

Pab(t)=cb(t)2Vab2hsin2ω0-ωt/2ω0-ω2(9.28)

(d) At what time does the system first return to its initial state?


See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free