Prove the following three theorem;

a) For normalizable solutions the separation constant E must be real as E0+iτand show that if equation 1.20 is to hold for all t,τ must be zero.

b) The time - independent wave function localid="1658117146660" ψ(x) can always be taken to be real, This doesn’t mean that every solution to the time-independent Schrodinger equation is real; what it says is that if you’ve got one that is not, it can always be expressed as a linear combination of solutions that are . So, you might as well stick toψ ’s that are real

c) If is an even function then ψ(x)can always be taken to be either even or odd

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The wave-function normalized we make τ=0, and in general,Esmust be real for a normalized wave-function.

(b)ψ,ψ*and any linear combination of them satisfy eq. (2.5).

(c) An even wave-function, an odd wave-function, and any linear combination of them satisfy eq.(2.5) if the potential function is even.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1: Define the Schrodinger equation

Schrödinger's wave equation, sometimes known as the Schrödinger equation, is a partial differential equation that uses the wave function to explain how quantum mechanical systems behave. The trajectory, position, and energy of these systems can be determined using the Schrödinger equation.

02

Determine the equation is normalized

(a)

ConsiderE=E0+iΓ, whereE°,Γ. Now, we calculate the probability density of the time-dependent wave function ψ.

ψx,t2=ψ*ψ=ψ*eE0-t/ħψe-E0-t/ħ=ψ2e2Γt/ħ

To check the normalizability of this wave-function, we integrate over all space.

-ψx,t2=-ψ2e2Γt/ħdx=e2Γt/ħ-ψ2dx=e2Γt/ħ

So, it is not normalized (because the energy is not real), so to make it normalized we make Γ=0, and in general,E must be real for a normalized wave-function.

03

Determine the real solutions

(b)

Eq.(2.5) is

ħ22md2ψdx2+Vψ=Eψ

Now, if ψsatisfy this equation, then its conjugate ψ*also satisfy eq.(2.5), where ψand ψ*are complex.

ħ22md2ψdx2+Vψ*=Eψ*

So, any linear combination of these two function must satisfy eq.(2.5) too (i.g.,ψ+ψ*and iψ=ψ*), in general

ψ=a1ω+a2x

Where ωand xare wave-functions, and a1and a2are complex constants.

-ħ22md2ψdx2+Vψ=-ħ22md2a1ω+a2xdx2+Va1ω+a2x=Ea1ω+a2x

-ħ22ma1d2ωdx2+a2d2xdx2+a1Vω+a2Vx=a1Eω+2Ex-ħ22ma1d2ωdx2+a2d2xdx2+a1Vω+a2Vx=a1Eω+2Exa1-ħ22md2ωdx2+Vω+a2-ħ22md2xdx2+Vx=a1Eω+a2Ex-ħ22md2ψdx2+Vψ=Eψ

So from any complex solution, we can always construct two real solutions.

04

Determine the general solution

(c)

For an odd time-independent wave-function ψ-x=-ψx, so

-ħ22md2ψxdx2-x=-x

Therefore,

-ħ22md2ψxdx2+x=-x

For an even time-independent wave-functionψ-x=ψx, so

-ħ22md2ψxdx2+-x=-x-ħ22md2ψxdx2+x=-x

As we have see, both (the even and odd wave-function) satisfy eq.(2.5), so any

linear combination must satisfy this equation too, whereψevenx=12ψx+ψ-x, and ψoddx=12ψx-ψ-x.

The general solution can then be built from a linear combination of even and odd functions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Evaluate the following integrals:

(a)-3+1(x3-3x2+2x-1)δ(x+2)dx.

(b).0[cos(3x)+2]δ(x-π)dx

(c)_1+1exp(lxl+3)δ(x-2)dx

Show that [Aeikx+Be-ikx] and [Ccos(kx)+Dsin(kx)] are equivalent ways of writing the same function of x, and determine the constants C and D in terms of Aand B, and vice versa.

a) Compute x,p,x2,p2, for the states ψ0and ψ1, by explicit integration. Comment; In this and other problems involving the harmonic oscillator it simplifies matters if you introduce the variable ξmωxand the constant α(mωπ)1/4.

b) Check the uncertainty principle for these states.

c) Compute T(the average kinetic energy) and V(the average potential energy) for these states. (No new integration allowed). Is their sum what you would expect?

Imagine a bead of mass m that slides frictionlessly around a circular wire ring of circumference L. (This is just like a free particle, except that Ψ(x+L)=Ψ(x)find the stationary states (with appropriate normalization) and the corresponding allowed energies. Note that there are two independent solutions for each energy En-corresponding to clockwise and counter-clockwise circulation; call themΨn+(x) andΨn-(x) How do you account for this degeneracy, in view of the theorem in Problem 2.45 (why does the theorem fail, in this case)?

This is a strictly qualitative problem-no calculations allowed! Consider the "double square well" potential (Figure 2.21). Suppose the depth V0and the width a are fixed, and large enough so that several bound states occur.

(a) Sketch the ground state wave function Ψ1and the first excited state localid="1658211858701" Ψ2(i) for the case b = 0 (ii) forbaand (iii) for ba

(b) Qualitatively, how do the corresponding energies(E1andE2)and vary, as b goes from 0 to ? Sketch E1(b)and E2(b)on the same graph.

(c) The double well is a very primitive one-dimensional model for the potential experienced by an electron in a diatomic molecule (the two wells represent the attractive force of the nuclei). If the nuclei are free to move, they will adopt the configuration of minimum energy. In view of your conclusions in (b), does the electron tend to draw the nuclei together, or push them apart? (Of course, there is also the internuclear repulsion to consider, but that's a separate problem.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free