This problem is designed to guide you through a “proof” of Plancherel’s theorem, by starting with the theory of ordinary Fourier series on a finite interval, and allowing that interval to expand to infinity.

(a) Dirichlet’s theorem says that “any” function f(x) on the interval [-a,+a]can be expanded as a Fourier series:

f(x)=n=0[ansinnπxa+bncosnπxa]

Show that this can be written equivalently as

f(x)=n=-cneinπx/a.

What is cn, in terms of anand bn?

(b) Show (by appropriate modification of Fourier’s trick) that

cn=12a-a+af(x)e-inπx/adx

(c) Eliminate n and cnin favor of the new variables k=(nττ/a)andF(k)=2/πacn. Show that (a) and (b) now become

f(x)=12πn=-F(k)eikxk;F(k)=12π-a+af(x).eikxdx.

where kis the increment in k from one n to the next.

(d) Take the limit ato obtain Plancherel’s theorem. Comment: In view of their quite different origins, it is surprising (and delightful) that the two formulas—one for F(k) in terms of f(x), the other for f(x) terms of F(k) —have such a similar structure in the limit a.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a)fx=n=-cneinπx/a(b)cn=12a-aafxeinπx/adx(c)Fk=2πa12a-aafxeinπx/adx=12π-aafxeinπx/adxdfx=12π-Fkeinπx/adx;Fk=12π-Fxeinπx/adx

Step by step solution

01

Given information:

The Fourier series is given by:

fx=n=0ansinnπxa+bncosnπxa

02

 Step 2 : (a) Showing that the Fourier series can be equivalently written as:

Dirichlet’s theorem is written as:

fx=b0+n=1an2ieinπx/a-e-inπx/a+n=1bn2einπx/a-e-inπx/a=b0+n=1an2i+bn2einπx/a+n=1-an2i+bn2e-inπx/a

So there are two values for , one for positive n’s, where the other is for negative values of n’s.

c0b0;cn=12-ian+bn,forn=1,2,3,...;cnia-n+b-n,forn=-1,-2,-3,.

c0b0;cn=12-ian+bn,forn=1,2,3,...;cnia-n+b-n,forn=-1,-2,-3,.

Thus,

fx=n=-cneinπx/a

03

(b) Showing by approximate modification of Fourier series

TofindCn,multiplybothsidesbyψm*xthenintegratefrom-atoa.-aafxe-mπx/adx=n=-cn-aaein-mπx/adx,-aaein-mπx/adx=ein-mπx/ain-mπ/a-aa=ein-mπ-ee-in-mπin-mπ/a=-1n-m--1n-min-mπ/a=0

Whereasforn=m,-aaein-mπx/adx=-aadx=2a.Soalltermsexceptn=marezero,and-aafxe-imπx/a=2acm,socn=12a-aafxe-imπx/adx.

04

 Step 3: (c) Showing that (a) and (b) are

fx=12πn=-Fkeikxk;Fk=12π-a+afx.e-ikxdx.usingk=nττa,andFk=2ττacnWecanwrite:fx=n=-π21aFkeikx=12πFkeikxkWherek=ττaistheincrementinkfromnton+1Fk2πa12a-aafxeikxdx=12π-aafxe-ikxdx

05

(d) Obtaining Plancherel’s theorem 

As a → ∞, k becomes a continuous variable, and the sum becomes an integration, therefore,

fx=12π-Fkeikxdk;

For F (k) the limits of the integration will change,

fk=12π-fxe-ikxdx;

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the moving delta-function well: V(x,t)=-αδ(x-vt)

where v is the (constant) velocity of the well. (a) Show that the time-dependent Schrödinger equation admits the exact solution ψ(x,t)=he-|x-vt|lh2e-i[E+1/2mv2t-mvx]lhwhere E=-2l2h2 is the bound-state energy of the stationary delta function. Hint: Plug it in and check it! Use the result of Problem 2.24(b). (b) Find the expectation value of the Hamiltonian in this state, and comment on the result.

Although the overall phase constant of the wave function is of no physical significance (it cancels out whenever you calculate a measurable quantity), the relative phase of the coefficients in Equation 2.17 does matter. For example, suppose we change the relative phase of ψ1andψ2in problem 2.5:ψ(x,0)=A[ψ1x+eiϕψ2x]Where ϕis some constant. Find ψ(x,t),|ψx,t|2, and (x), and compare your results with what you got before. Study the special cases ϕ=π2andϕ=π.

A particle of mass m and kinetic energy E > 0 approaches an abrupt potential drop V0 (Figure 2.19).

(a)What is the probability that it will “reflect” back, if E = V0/3? Hint: This is just like problem 2.34, except that the step now goes down, instead of up.

(b) I drew the figure so as to make you think of a car approaching a cliff, but obviously the probability of “bouncing back” from the edge of a cliff is far smaller than what you got in (a)—unless you’re Bugs Bunny. Explain why this potential does not correctly represent a cliff. Hint: In Figure 2.20 the potential energy of the car drops discontinuously to −V0, as it passes x = 0; would this be true for a falling car?

(c) When a free neutron enters a nucleus, it experiences a sudden drop in potential energy, from V = 0 outside to around −12 MeV (million electron volts) inside. Suppose a neutron, emitted with kinetic energy 4 MeV by a fission event, strikes such a nucleus. What is the probability it will be absorbed, thereby initiating another fission? Hint: You calculated the probability of reflection in part (a); use T = 1 − R to get the probability of transmission through the surface.

Analyze the odd bound state wave functions for the finite square well. Derive the transcendental equation for the allowed energies and solve it graphically. Examine the two limiting cases. Is there always an odd bound state?

Find the transmission coefficient for the potential in problem 2.27

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free