Analyze the odd bound state wave functions for the finite square well. Derive the transcendental equation for the allowed energies and solve it graphically. Examine the two limiting cases. Is there always an odd bound state?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The solution has the following form:

ψlx=cekxψllx=bsinkxψlllx=-c.e-kx

The requirement for such a case of the shallow, narrow well would be if the tangent graph never intersects with the rational function, meaning that the vertical asymptote would be lower than the one of the tangent squared graphs. In other words:

Ω<π2aV0<ħ2π28ma2

If the value ofV0is lower than the latter, the bound state will not exist.

Next, we can observe the other limiting case, which is an infinite square well whereV0.

Then, the transcendental equation reduces to:

role="math" localid="1658228086695" tan2ka=0sinka=0k=nπa,nbeinganteger.

Which corresponds to the energy spectrum of the odd states of the infinite potential well.

Step by step solution

01

 Define the Schrödinger equation

A differential equation that describes matter in quantum mechanics in terms of the wave-like properties of particles in a field. Its answer is related to a particle's probability density in space and time.

02

Determine the two limiting cases

First, let's write the potential in the following form:

Vx=0,x-a-V0,-a<x<a0,xa

Now, the stationary Schrödinger equation reads:

-ħ22mddx2ψx+Vxψx=Eψx

Next, we shall split the x axis into three regions, following the same logic as the piecewise form of the potential (region I correspond to the area left of the well, region II corresponds to the well, and region IIl to the area right of the well).

Since the potential is symmetric, the wave functions consist of a set of even and odd wave functions. We shall observe the odd wave functions. Since we are observing the case where E<0 the stationary Schrödinger equation in the region, I read:

-ħ22mddx2ψx=Eψx

Now, using the abbreviation,k2=2mElħ2the previous equation becomes:

ddx2ψx-k2ψx=0

This is a simple linear differential equation, for which the solution in the most general form is:

ψlx=A1ekx+B1e-kx

Now, in region II, the stationary Schrödinger equation in the region I read:

-ħ22mddxψx+E-V0ψx=0

Proceeding in the same manner, we can define the following abbreviation:

k2=2mV0-Eħ2

And using it, we obtain the following form of the Schrödinger equation:

ddx2ψx+k2ψx=0

Which is, again, a simple linear differential equation having the solutions of the form:

ψllx=A2coskx+B2sinkx

We can very easily obtain the solutions to the problem in region III due to the fact that the problem is the same as in region I; therefore, the total solution is given by:

ψlx=A1ekx+B1e-kxψllx=A2coskX+B2sinkXψlllx=A3ekx+B3e-kx

03

Find the two limiting cases

We now have the total solution. We need to observe the boundary conditions.

First of all, since we are assuming a bound state, we require our wave function to vanish asx+.

Therefore, we conclude that B1=A3=0, since these terms diverge at infinities. Secondly, we are observing odd states, soψ-x=ψx, therefore, we conclude that A1=-B3=cand A2=0, since the cosine is an even function.

For simplicity, we shall defineB2=b. After these conclusions, our solution has the following form:

ψlx=cekxψllx=bsinkxψlllx=-c.e-kx

Next, we need to connect the wave functions at the meeting points of different regions, as well as their derivatives, since both need to be continuous (the only case where the derivative is discontinuous is when the potential involves a delta function). It suffices to connect them at either x=-aor x=a, since both give the same set of linear equations.

By requiring the continuity of the wave function and the continuity of the derivatives atx=a,we obtain the following set of linear equations:

-c.e-ka=b.sinkakc.e-ka=kb.coska

We can put this homogeneous set of equations into a matrix form, and the condition for it to have a non-trivial solution is given by the requirement for the determinant of the system to vanish:

localid="1658232743867" -e-ka-sinkake-ka-kcoska=0-e-kax-kcoska+ke-ka×-sinka=0tanka=-kk

This is a transcendental equation, and before we proceed, we need to observe the relation between k2and k2, namely:

k2+k2=2mV0ħ2=Ω2

After squaring the transcendental equation and inserting the relation betweenk2andk2, we obtain the following equation:

tan2ka=k2Ω2-k2

It is important to notice that the variable here is .

The following graph represents the latter equation (for some fixed values aof and Ω), the red graph represents the tangent function, and the green graph represents the right side.

04

Plot the graph

The intersections of the two give the appropriate values of κ.

Again, it is possible for the two not to intersect if the depth of the well V0is not large enough.

We have squared the transcendental equation to avoid the confusion when choosing the sign ofkafter taking the square root of the equation (1).

However, we could've not squared it, but then we would be required to observe different cases for different signs ofk.

It is possible not to have solutions to the equation, depending on the depth and strength of the well.

The graphical representation of such a case is shown below.

The requirement for such a case would be if the tangent graph never intersects with the rational function, meaning that the vertical asymptote would be lower than the one of the tangent squared graphs. In other words:

Ω<π2aV0<ħ2π28ma2

If the value ofV0is lower than the latter, the bound state will not exist. Next, we can observe the other limiting case, whereV0.

Then, the transcendental equation reduces to:

tan2ka=0sinka=0k=nπa,nbeinganinteger.

Which corresponds to the energy spectrum of the odd states of the infinite potential well.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A particle of mass m in the infinite square well (of width a) starts out in the left half of the well, and is (at t=0) equally likely to be found at any point in that region

(a) What is its initial wave function, ψ(x,0)? (Assume it is real. Don’t forget to normalize it.)

(b) What is the probability that a measurement of the energy would yield the valuesπ2h22ma2?

Show that there is no acceptable solution to the Schrodinger equation for the infinite square well with E=0orE<0(This is a special case of the general theorem in Problem 2.2, but this time do it by explicitly solving the Schrodinger equation, and showing that you cannot meet the boundary conditions.)

-consider the “step” potential:

v(x)={0,ifx0,V0,ifx>0,

a.Calculate the reflection coefficient, for the case E < V0, and comment on the answer.

b. Calculate the reflection coefficient, for the case E >V0.

c. For potential such as this, which does not go back to zero to the right of the barrier, the transmission coefficient is not simply F2A2(with A the incident amplitude and F the transmitted amplitude), because the transmitted wave travels at a different speed . Show thatT=E-V0V0F2A2,for E >V0. What is T for E < V0?

d. For E > V0, calculate the transmission coefficient for the step potential, and check that T + R = 1.


Although the overall phase constant of the wave function is of no physical significance (it cancels out whenever you calculate a measurable quantity), the relative phase of the coefficients in Equation 2.17 does matter. For example, suppose we change the relative phase of ψ1andψ2in problem 2.5:ψ(x,0)=A[ψ1x+eiϕψ2x]Where ϕis some constant. Find ψ(x,t),|ψx,t|2, and (x), and compare your results with what you got before. Study the special cases ϕ=π2andϕ=π.

a) Compute x,p,x2,p2, for the states ψ0and ψ1, by explicit integration. Comment; In this and other problems involving the harmonic oscillator it simplifies matters if you introduce the variable ξmωxand the constant α(mωπ)1/4.

b) Check the uncertainty principle for these states.

c) Compute T(the average kinetic energy) and V(the average potential energy) for these states. (No new integration allowed). Is their sum what you would expect?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free