Solve the time-independent Schr ̈odinger equation for a centered infinite square well with a delta-function barrier in the middle:

V(x)={αδ(x)for-a<x<+afor|x|a

Treat the even and odd wave functions separately. Don’t bother to normalize them. Find the allowed energies (graphically, if necessary). How do they compare with the corresponding energies in the absence of the delta function? Explain why the odd solutions are not affected by the delta function. Comment on the limiting cases α → 0 and α → ∞.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Allowed energies can be calculated from the formulaEn=n2π2ħ22ma ,being an integer. The problem reduces to the problem of the infinite square well without the delta function. We can conclude that the odd wave functions are unaffected by the delta function since they vanish at the origin.

Step by step solution

01

Integrating the equation around a small neighborhood around the origin, where the delta function is being situated.

Since, the Schrodinger equation is given by,

-ħ2mddx2ψx+Vxψx=Eψx

Where, the potentialVxis given as:

-εεħ2mddx2ψx+Vxψxdx=-εεEψxdx

Use the linearity of the integral to separate the left side of the previous equation into two integrals,

-εεħ2mddx2ψxdx+-εεαδxψxdx=-εεEψxdx

The integral on the right side becomes zero. Hence the solution to the stationary Schrodinger equation gives continuous solutions, and therefore, the integral over an arbitrarily infinitesimal region is equal to zero. However, we can’t use the same logic for the term on the left side of the equation since the integral involves a delta function.

Therefore,

-εεħ22mddx2ψxdx=αψ0Since,ddxψ0+-ddxψ0-=2mħ2αψ0

Now, we got an extra condition that needs to be satisfied – the spatial derivative of the wave function is discontinuous.

02

Solving the Schrodinger equation in the regions around the delta functions.

The wave function is equal to zero in the region where the potential issince the probability of tunneling into those regions has to be zero. The solution must now consist of two sets – odd, and even wave functions as the potential are even. Denoting the region left of the delta function by l and right of the delta function by ll. Since the potential is equal to zero in these two regions (l and ll), the Schrodinger equation becomes,

-ħ22mdddx2ψx=EψxSinceenergyhastobegreaterthanzero(asthepotentialintheseregionsiszero),Using,k2=2mEħ2ψ''x+k2ψx=0Thisisanequationofaharmonicoscillator.Therefore,ψx=Acoskx+Bsinkx

03

Even and odd solutions

The solutions in the regions l and ll are given by:

ψlx=A1coskx+B1sinkxψllx=A2coskx+B2sinkx

Since the solutions are odd, we must have ψlx=ψllx.

From that follows B1=-B2=bandA1=A2=d

Therefore,

ψlx=dcoskx+bsinkxψllx=dcoskx+bsinkx

As of now, we have three unknown variables, d, b, and k. Using the boundary condition that the wave functions must disappear at , together with the discontinuity condition and the normalization condition, we have 3 required equations.

From the first two conditions,

dcoska+bsinka=0α2mħa+2dk=0

In the second condition, the value of ψ0can be picked from either ψlorψllor since both the wave functions are to be connected at the origin.

cosKAsinKA2mħ2α2k=0tanka=-kħ2mα

This is a transcendental equation. Hence it has no analytic solutions. The solutions can be determined either by graphical or numerical methods. Since this equation gives discrete values of k, this is the equation that determines the discrete energy spectrum of the system for even solutions.

Now, notice the limiting cases of the parameterα.

As α0, the energy condition becomestanka, hence, producing the same results as the potential well but without the delta functions.

And for α, the energy condition becomes tanka0, giving the energy spectrum of the potential well with the half-width, a.

This makes sense as α, the barrier becomes impenetrable.

Following the same logic, we obtain that B1=B2=bandA1=A2=0, from the requirement that the wave function is to be odd and joined at the origin. Since the function disappears at the origin, the discontinuity requirement provides no new information. And hence, the problem reduces to the problem of the infinite square well without the delta function. The energies are determined by the condition that the wave function vanishes at x=aorx=-a.

sinka=0k=nπaEn=n2π2ħ22ma,n, being an integer.

Therefore, we can conclude that the odd wave functions are unaffected by the delta function since they vanish at the origin.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A particle of mass m in the infinite square well (of width a) starts out in the left half of the well, and is (at t=0) equally likely to be found at any point in that region

(a) What is its initial wave function, ψ(x,0)? (Assume it is real. Don’t forget to normalize it.)

(b) What is the probability that a measurement of the energy would yield the valuesπ2h22ma2?

The Dirac delta function can be bought off as the limiting case of a rectangle area 1, as the height goes to infinity and the width goes to Zero. Show that the delta function well (Equation 2.114) is weak potential (even though it is infinitely deep), in the sense that Z00. Determine the bound state energy for the delta function potential, by treating it as the limit of a finite square well. Check that your answer is consistent with equation 2.129. Also, show that equation 2.169 reduces to Equation 2.141 in the appropriate limit.

A particle of mass m and kinetic energy E > 0 approaches an abrupt potential drop V0 (Figure 2.19).

(a)What is the probability that it will “reflect” back, if E = V0/3? Hint: This is just like problem 2.34, except that the step now goes down, instead of up.

(b) I drew the figure so as to make you think of a car approaching a cliff, but obviously the probability of “bouncing back” from the edge of a cliff is far smaller than what you got in (a)—unless you’re Bugs Bunny. Explain why this potential does not correctly represent a cliff. Hint: In Figure 2.20 the potential energy of the car drops discontinuously to −V0, as it passes x = 0; would this be true for a falling car?

(c) When a free neutron enters a nucleus, it experiences a sudden drop in potential energy, from V = 0 outside to around −12 MeV (million electron volts) inside. Suppose a neutron, emitted with kinetic energy 4 MeV by a fission event, strikes such a nucleus. What is the probability it will be absorbed, thereby initiating another fission? Hint: You calculated the probability of reflection in part (a); use T = 1 − R to get the probability of transmission through the surface.

Question: Find the probability current, J (Problem 1.14) for the free particle wave function Equation 2.94. Which direction does the probability flow?

In Problem 2.21 you analyzed the stationary gaussian free particle wave packet. Now solve the same problem for the traveling gaussian wave packet, starting with the initial wave function.ψ(x,0)=Ae-ax2eilx

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free