Imagine a bead of mass m that slides frictionlessly around a circular wire ring of circumference L. (This is just like a free particle, except that Ψ(x+L)=Ψ(x)find the stationary states (with appropriate normalization) and the corresponding allowed energies. Note that there are two independent solutions for each energy En-corresponding to clockwise and counter-clockwise circulation; call themΨn+(x) andΨn-(x) How do you account for this degeneracy, in view of the theorem in Problem 2.45 (why does the theorem fail, in this case)?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The conclusion is that this theorem fails because:

(1) Ψdoes not go to zero at infinity

(2) x is restricted to a finite range

(3) we are unable to determine the constant K

Step by step solution

01

Define the Schrödinger equation

The equation for the time-dependent Schrödinger equation is,

ihddt|Ψ(t)>=H^|Ψ(t)>

One coordinate, x, is all that is required to describe a bead's location on a ring because the ring is in a two-dimensional plane. The next step is to solve the Schrödinger equation for the wave function in one dimension Ψ(x, t).

02

Step 2: Measured the value of x in the given circumference

The value of x is determined around the circumference.

Here given equation is:

-h22md2ψdx2=Eψd2ψdx2=-k2ψ,

where k =2mEh

ψx=Aeikx+Be-ikxAeikxeiKL+Be-ikxeiKL=Aeikx+Be-ikxAeikL+Be-ikL=A+B......(1)


Now,

Aeiπ/2eikL+Be-iπ/2e-ikL=Aeiπ/2+Be-iπ/2iAeikL-iBe-ikL=iA-iBAeikL-iBe-ikL=A-B.....(2)

Add equations (1) and (2), and we get,

2AeikL=2A

03

Step 3: Now normalize the given equation

When A= 0 ,eikL=1,kL=2nπ, n is an integer.

If A = 0, then Be-ikL=B .

This leads to the same conclusions.

Now, every positive n has two solutions ψn+x=Aei2nπx/L and ψn-x=Aei2nπx/L.

For n = 0 , there is just one solution:

0Lψ±2dx=1A=B=1/L

Any other solution will be a linear combination of these as:

ψn±x=1Le±i2nπx/LEn=2n2π2h2mL2,n=0,1,2,3,4,...

Hence, we conclude that this theorem fails because:

(1)ψ does not go to zero at infinity

(2) x is restricted to a finite range

(3) we are unable to determine the constant K

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Use the recursion formula (Equation 2.85) to work out H5(ξ) and H6(ξ) Invoke the convention that the coefficient of the highest power of role="math" localid="1657778520591" ξ is 2t to fix the overall constant.

This problem is designed to guide you through a “proof” of Plancherel’s theorem, by starting with the theory of ordinary Fourier series on a finite interval, and allowing that interval to expand to infinity.

(a) Dirichlet’s theorem says that “any” function f(x) on the interval [-a,+a]can be expanded as a Fourier series:

f(x)=n=0[ansinnπxa+bncosnπxa]

Show that this can be written equivalently as

f(x)=n=-cneinπx/a.

What is cn, in terms of anand bn?

(b) Show (by appropriate modification of Fourier’s trick) that

cn=12a-a+af(x)e-inπx/adx

(c) Eliminate n and cnin favor of the new variables k=(nττ/a)andF(k)=2/πacn. Show that (a) and (b) now become

f(x)=12πn=-F(k)eikxk;F(k)=12π-a+af(x).eikxdx.

where kis the increment in k from one n to the next.

(d) Take the limit ato obtain Plancherel’s theorem. Comment: In view of their quite different origins, it is surprising (and delightful) that the two formulas—one for F(k) in terms of f(x), the other for f(x) terms of F(k) —have such a similar structure in the limit a.

For the wave function in Example 2.2, find the expectation value of H, at time t=0 ,the “old fashioned way:

H=Ψ(x,0)H^Ψ(x,0)dx.

Compare the result obtained in Example 2.3. Note: BecauseH is independent of time, there is no loss of generality in usingt=0

The gaussian wave packet. A free particle has the initial wave function

Y(x,0)=Ae-ax2

whereAand are constants ( is real and positive).

(a) NormalizeY(x,0)

(b) Find Y(x,t). Hint: Integrals of the form

-+e-(ax2+bx)dx

Can be handled by “completing the square”: Lety=a[x+bl2a], and note that(ax2+bx)=y2-(b2l4a). Answer:

localid="1658297483210" Y(x,t)=(2aπ)1/4e-ex2l[1+(2ihatlm)]1+(2ihatlm)

(c) Find . Express your answer in terms of the quantity

localid="1658297497509" ω=a1+(2ihatlm)2

Sketchlocalid="1658124147567" |Y|2(as a function of x) at t=0, and again for some very large t. Qualitatively, what happens to |Y|2, as time goes on?

(d) Find <x>,<p>,<x2>,<p2>,σxand σP. Partial answer:localid="1658297458579" <p2>=ah2, but it may take some algebra to reduce it to this simple form.

(e) Does the uncertainty principle hold? At what time tdoes the system come

closest to the uncertainty limit?

A particle of mass m in the harmonic oscillator potential (Equation 2.44) starts ψ(x,0)=A(1-2mωħx)2e-mω2ħx2out in the state for some constant A.
(a) What is the expectation value of the energy?
(c) At a later time T the wave function islocalid="1658123604154" ψ(x,T)=B(1+2mωħx)2e-mω2ħx2
for some constant B. What is the smallest possible value of T ?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free