Imagine a bead of mass m that slides frictionlessly around a circular wire ring of circumference L. (This is just like a free particle, except that Ψ(x+L)=Ψ(x)find the stationary states (with appropriate normalization) and the corresponding allowed energies. Note that there are two independent solutions for each energy En-corresponding to clockwise and counter-clockwise circulation; call themΨn+(x) andΨn-(x) How do you account for this degeneracy, in view of the theorem in Problem 2.45 (why does the theorem fail, in this case)?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The conclusion is that this theorem fails because:

(1) Ψdoes not go to zero at infinity

(2) x is restricted to a finite range

(3) we are unable to determine the constant K

Step by step solution

01

Define the Schrödinger equation

The equation for the time-dependent Schrödinger equation is,

ihddt|Ψ(t)>=H^|Ψ(t)>

One coordinate, x, is all that is required to describe a bead's location on a ring because the ring is in a two-dimensional plane. The next step is to solve the Schrödinger equation for the wave function in one dimension Ψ(x, t).

02

Step 2: Measured the value of x in the given circumference

The value of x is determined around the circumference.

Here given equation is:

-h22md2ψdx2=Eψd2ψdx2=-k2ψ,

where k =2mEh

ψx=Aeikx+Be-ikxAeikxeiKL+Be-ikxeiKL=Aeikx+Be-ikxAeikL+Be-ikL=A+B......(1)


Now,

Aeiπ/2eikL+Be-iπ/2e-ikL=Aeiπ/2+Be-iπ/2iAeikL-iBe-ikL=iA-iBAeikL-iBe-ikL=A-B.....(2)

Add equations (1) and (2), and we get,

2AeikL=2A

03

Step 3: Now normalize the given equation

When A= 0 ,eikL=1,kL=2nπ, n is an integer.

If A = 0, then Be-ikL=B .

This leads to the same conclusions.

Now, every positive n has two solutions ψn+x=Aei2nπx/L and ψn-x=Aei2nπx/L.

For n = 0 , there is just one solution:

0Lψ±2dx=1A=B=1/L

Any other solution will be a linear combination of these as:

ψn±x=1Le±i2nπx/LEn=2n2π2h2mL2,n=0,1,2,3,4,...

Hence, we conclude that this theorem fails because:

(1)ψ does not go to zero at infinity

(2) x is restricted to a finite range

(3) we are unable to determine the constant K

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

This problem is designed to guide you through a “proof” of Plancherel’s theorem, by starting with the theory of ordinary Fourier series on a finite interval, and allowing that interval to expand to infinity.

(a) Dirichlet’s theorem says that “any” function f(x) on the interval [-a,+a]can be expanded as a Fourier series:

f(x)=n=0[ansinnπxa+bncosnπxa]

Show that this can be written equivalently as

f(x)=n=-cneinπx/a.

What is cn, in terms of anand bn?

(b) Show (by appropriate modification of Fourier’s trick) that

cn=12a-a+af(x)e-inπx/adx

(c) Eliminate n and cnin favor of the new variables k=(nττ/a)andF(k)=2/πacn. Show that (a) and (b) now become

f(x)=12πn=-F(k)eikxk;F(k)=12π-a+af(x).eikxdx.

where kis the increment in k from one n to the next.

(d) Take the limit ato obtain Plancherel’s theorem. Comment: In view of their quite different origins, it is surprising (and delightful) that the two formulas—one for F(k) in terms of f(x), the other for f(x) terms of F(k) —have such a similar structure in the limit a.

Show that E must be exceed the minimum value of V(x) ,for every normalizable solution to the time independent Schrodinger equation what is classical analog to this statement?

d2Ψdx2=2mh2[V(x)E]Ψ;

IfE<Vmin thenΨ and its second derivative always have the same sign. Is it normalized?

In Problem 2.7 (d), you got the expectation value of the energy by summing the series in Equation 2.39, but 1 warned you (in footnote 15 not to try it the "old fashioned way,"<H>=Ψ(x,0)*HΨ(x,0)dx, because the discontinuous first derivative ofΨ(x.0)renders the second derivative problematic. Actually, you could have done it using integration by parts, but the Dirac delta function affords a much cleaner way to handle such anomalies.

(a) Calculate the first derivative of Ψ(x.0)(in Problem 2.7), and express the answer in terms of the step function, θ(x-c1/2)defined in Equation (Don't worry about the end points-just the interior region

(b) Exploit the result of Problem 2.24(b) to write the second derivative of Ψ(x,0)in terms of the delta function.

(c) Evaluate the integral Ψ(x,0)*HΨ(x,0)dxand check that you get the same answer as before.

Although the overall phase constant of the wave function is of no physical significance (it cancels out whenever you calculate a measurable quantity), the relative phase of the coefficients in Equation 2.17 does matter. For example, suppose we change the relative phase of ψ1andψ2in problem 2.5:ψ(x,0)=A[ψ1x+eiϕψ2x]Where ϕis some constant. Find ψ(x,t),|ψx,t|2, and (x), and compare your results with what you got before. Study the special cases ϕ=π2andϕ=π.

a) Construct ψ2(x)

b) Sketch ψ0,ψ1andψ2

c) Check the orthogonality ofψ0ψ1ψ2 by explicit integration.

Hint:If you exploit the even-ness and odd-ness of the functions, there is really only one integral left to do.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free