Calculate (x),(x2),(p),(p2),σxandσp,for the nth stationary state of the infinite square well. Check that the uncertainty principle is satisfied. Which state comes closest to the uncertainty limit?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The uncertainty principle is satisfied.

For1.136h2>h2n = 1 is the state that comes closest to the uncertainty limit.

The required values are:

x=a2x2a213-12n2π2p=0p2=ħnπa2σx=a213-2nπ2σp=ħnπa

Step by step solution

01

Step 1: Define the Schrodinger equation

A differential equation that describes matter in quantum mechanics in terms of the wave-like properties of particles in a field. Its answer is related to a particle's probability density in space and time.

02

Determine the uncertainty principle

The stationary state for the infinite potential well is:

ψnx=2asinax

Calculate all the expectation values and the variance in that values as we did in chapter one. The expectation value of the position is:

x=2a0a×sinnπaxdx

Using integration by parts, so we get:

x=a2

03

Determine the expectation position and momentum

The expectation for the position squared is:

x2=2aanπ30nπy2sinydyx2=a213-12n2π2

The expectation value for the momentum operator is:

p=-iħ2a0asinnπaxcosnπaxdxp=-iħ2aanπ0nπsinysocydyp=0

p2=-ħ2anπa20asin2nπaxdxp2=ħπna2p2=ħπna2

04

Determine the variance of position and momentum

Find the variance for position and momentum:

σx=x2-x2

Substitute the values, and we get,

σx=a213-2nπ2

σp=p2-p2

Substitute the values, and we get,

σp=ħnπa

Finally, the closet state to the uncertainty limit is the state with the lowest possible energy (n = 1), where we can prove this by:

role="math" localid="1658122114260" σxσp=ħ2π23-2=1.136ħ2

And

1.136ħ2>ħ2

The uncertainty principle is satisfied.

For 1.136ħ2>ħ2n = 1 is the state that comes closest to the uncertainty limit.

The required values are:

x=a2x2=a213-12n2π2p=0p2=ħnπa2σx=a213-2nπ2σp=ħnπa

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Delta functions live under integral signs, and two expressions (D1xandD2x)involving delta functions are said to be equal if

-+f(x)D1(x)dx=-+f(x)D2(x)dxfor every (ordinary) function f(x).

(a) Show that

δ(cx)=1|c|δ(x)(2.145)

where c is a real constant. (Be sure to check the case where c is negative.)

(b) Let θ(x) be the step function:

θ(x){1,x>00,x>0(2.146).

(In the rare case where it actually matters, we define θ(0) to be 1/2.) Show that dθldx=δ

Evaluate the following integrals:

(a)-3+1(x3-3x2+2x-1)δ(x+2)dx.

(b).0[cos(3x)+2]δ(x-π)dx

(c)_1+1exp(lxl+3)δ(x-2)dx

Determine the transmission coefficient for a rectangular barrier (same as Equation 2.145, only with V(x)=+V0>0 in the regiona<x<a ). Treat separately the three casesE<V0,E=V0 , andE>V0 (note that the wave function inside the barrier is different in the three cases).

Consider the potential V(x)=-h2a2msech2(ax)where a is a positive constant, and "sech" stands for the hyperbolic secant

(a) Graph this potential.

(b) Check that this potential has the ground state

ψ0(x)and find its energy. Normalize and sketch its graph.

(C)Show that the function ψ2(x)=A(ik-atanhaxik+a)ekx

(Where k=2mEihas usual) solves the Schrödinger equation for any (positive) energy E. Sincetanhz-1asas This represents, then, a wave coming in from the left with no accompanying reflected wave (i.e., no term . What is the asymptotic formψk(x) of at large positive x? What are R and T, for this potential? Comment: This is a famous example of a reflectionless potential-every incident particle, regardless of its energy, passes right through.

Prove the following three theorem;

a) For normalizable solutions the separation constant E must be real as E0+iτand show that if equation 1.20 is to hold for all t,τ must be zero.

b) The time - independent wave function localid="1658117146660" ψ(x) can always be taken to be real, This doesn’t mean that every solution to the time-independent Schrodinger equation is real; what it says is that if you’ve got one that is not, it can always be expressed as a linear combination of solutions that are . So, you might as well stick toψ ’s that are real

c) If is an even function then ψ(x)can always be taken to be either even or odd

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free