For each of the following pairs of polymers, do the following: (1) state whether it is possible to decide whether one polymer has a higher tensile modulus than the other; (2) if his is possible, note which has the higher ensile modulus and then cite the reason(s) or your choice; and (3) if it is not possible o decide, then state why. a) Random acrylonitrile-butadiene copolyner with \(10 \%\) of possible sites crosslinked; ilternating acrylonitrile-butadiene copolymer with \(5 \%\) of possible sites crosslinked (b) Branched and syndiotactic polypropylene with a degree of polymerization of 5000 ; linear and isotactic polypropylene with a degree of polymerization of 3000 (c) Branched polyethylene with a numberaverage molecular weight of \(250,000 \mathrm{~g} / \mathrm{mol}\); linear and isotactic poly(vinyl chloride) with a number-average molecular weight of \(200,000 \mathrm{~g} / \mathrm{mol}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The random acrylonitrile-butadiene copolymer has a higher tensile modulus than the alternating acrylonitrile-butadiene copolymer. The reason for this conclusion is that the random acrylonitrile-butadiene copolymer has a higher amount of crosslinking (10% of possible sites crosslinked) compared to the alternating acrylonitrile-butadiene copolymer (5% of possible sites crosslinked), and a higher amount of crosslinking leads to a stronger and stiffer material, giving it a higher tensile modulus.

Step by step solution

01

Comparison of crosslinking percentages

Compare the crosslinking percentages: random acrylonitrile-butadiene copolymer has 10% of possible sites crosslinked while the alternating acrylonitrile-butadiene copolymer has 5% of possible sites crosslinked.
02

Deciding the higher tensile modulus

It's possible to decide which polymer has a higher tensile modulus. The random acrylonitrile-butadiene copolymer with 10% of possible sites crosslinked has a higher tensile modulus than the alternating acrylonitrile-butadiene copolymer with 5% of possible sites crosslinked.
03

Explanation

The reason for this conclusion is that a higher amount of crosslinking leads to a stronger and stiffer material, giving it a higher tensile modulus. #b) Branched syndiotactic polypropylene vs Linear isotactic polypropylene#
04

Comparison of degree of polymerization

Compare the degree of polymerization for both polymers: branched syndiotactic polypropylene (5000) and linear isotactic polypropylene (3000).
05

Deciding the higher tensile modulus

It's possible to decide which polymer has a higher tensile modulus. The linear isotactic polypropylene with a degree of polymerization of 3000 has a higher tensile modulus than the branched syndiotactic polypropylene with a degree of polymerization of 5000.
06

Explanation

The reason for this conclusion is that linear isotactic polymers have a more regular structure that allows for better packing and stronger intermolecular forces, which contributes to a higher tensile modulus. #c) Branched polyethylene vs linear isotactic poly(vinyl chloride)#
07

Comparison of molecular weight

Compare the molecular weight for both polymers: branched polyethylene (\(250,000 \mathrm{~g} / \mathrm{mol}\)) and linear isotactic poly(vinyl chloride) (\(200,000 \mathrm{~g} / \mathrm{mol}\)).
08

Deciding the higher tensile modulus

It's not possible to decide which polymer has a higher tensile modulus based on the given information.
09

Explanation

The reason for this conclusion is that we are comparing two different types of polymers with different molecular structures and arrangements. The given information about molecular weights is not sufficient to determine the tensile modulus in this case. Other factors, such as crystallinity and intermolecular forces, should also be considered.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Briefly explain how each of the following influences the tensile modulus of a semicrystalline polymer and why: (a) Molecular weight (b) Degree of crystallinity (c) Deformation by drawing (d) Annealing of an undeformed material (e) Annealing of a drawn material

For each of the following pairs of polymers, plot and label schematic specific volumeversus-temperature curves on the same graph [i.e., make separate plots for parts (a), (b), and (c)]. (a) Spherulitic polypropylene, of \(25 \%\) crystallinity, and having a weight- average molecular weight of \(75,000 \mathrm{~g} / \mathrm{mol}\); spherulitic polystyrene, of \(25 \%\) crystallinity, and having a weight-average molecular weight of \(100,000 \mathrm{~g} / \mathrm{mol}\) (b) Graft poly(styrene-butadiene) copolymer with \(10 \%\) of available sites crosslinked; random poly(styrene-butadiene) copolymer with \(15 \%\) of available sites crosslinked (c) Polyethylene having a density of \(0.985\) \(\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{cm}^{3}\) and a degree of polymerization of 2500; polyethylene having a density of \(0.915 \mathrm{~g} / \mathrm{cm}^{3}\) and a degree of polymerization of 2000

List the two molecular characteristics that are essential for elastomers.

In Figure 15.28, the logarithm of \(E_{r}(t)\) versus the logarithm of time is plotted for polyisobutylene at a variety of temperatures. Make a plot of \(E_{r}(10)\) versus temperature and then estimate its \(T_{g}\).

Name the following polymer(s) that would be suitable for the fabrication of cups to contain hot coffee: polyethylene, polypropylene, poly(vinyl chloride), PET polyester, and polycarbonate. Why?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free