Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 8: Problem 23

Cite five factors that may lead to scatter in fatigue life data.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The five factors that can lead to scatter in fatigue life data are material variability, load variation, testing environment, geometry and size of the specimen, and human and instrument error.

Step by step solution

01

Factor 1: Material Variability

The composition and microstructure of a material can vary depending on the manufacturing process, impurities, or inconsistency in treatment. This variability in materials plays a significant role in the fatigue life data scatter. As each specimen may have different material properties, it can lead to different fatigue life results, thus causing scatter in the data.
02

Factor 2: Load Variation

In real-world applications, the load applied to a material is often not constant and may fluctuate significantly. Factors such as the type of load (tensile, compressive, or shear), loading rate, and magnitude can all cause variations in the fatigue life data. This can lead to scatter as different materials or the same material under different loading conditions may exhibit differing fatigue lives.
03

Factor 3: Testing Environment

The testing environment can also lead to scatter in fatigue life data. Factors such as temperature, humidity, the presence of chemical agents, or corrosive environments can impact fatigue life. These factors may not be consistent across all tests and can result in deviations from expected results, causing scatter in the data.
04

Factor 4: Geometry and Size of the Specimen

The geometry and size of the specimen used for fatigue testing can have a significant impact on the results. For instance, small changes in the specimen's dimensions or the presence of notches, holes, or other geometric features can introduce stress concentrations, which can lead to a shorter-than-expected fatigue life. Variations in specimen geometry can cause scatter in the fatigue life data.
05

Factor 5: Human and Instrument Error

Finally, errors made by human operators or in the instruments used to conduct the tests can lead to scatter in the fatigue life data. These errors could include incorrect data recordings, inaccurate measurements, or misinterpretation of test parameters and results. Such errors can cause inconsistencies in the data and lead to scatter. In conclusion, material variability, load variation, testing environment, specimen geometry and size, and human and instrument error are five factors that may lead to scatter in fatigue life data. Understanding these factors can help in obtaining more accurate and consistent results while conducting fatigue life tests.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Cite three metallurgical/processing techniques that are employed to enhance the creep resistance of metal alloys.

A cylindrical 1045 steel bar (Figure 8.34) is subjected to repeated tension- compression stress cycling along its axis. If the load amplitude is \(22,000 \mathrm{~N}\left(4950 \mathrm{lb}_{\mathrm{f}}\right)\), compute the minimum allowable bar diameter to ensure that fatigue failure will not occur. Assume a factor of safety of \(2.0\).

Briefly explain the difference between fatigue striations and beachmarks in terms of both (a) size and (b) origin.

The following creep data were taken on an aluminum alloy at \(400^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\left(750^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\right)\) and a constant stress of 25 MPa (3660 psi). Plot the data as strain versus time, then determine the steady- state or minimum creep rate. Note: The initial and instantaneous strain is not included. $$ \begin{array}{cccc} \hline \begin{array}{c} \text { Time } \\ \text { (min) } \end{array} & \text { Strain } & \begin{array}{l} \text { Time } \\ \text { (min) } \end{array} & \text { Strain } \\ \hline 0 & 0.000 & 16 & 0.135 \\ 2 & 0.025 & 18 & 0.153 \\ 4 & 0.043 & 20 & 0.172 \\ 6 & 0.065 & 22 & 0.193 \\ 8 & 0.078 & 24 & 0.218 \\ 10 & 0.092 & 26 & 0.255 \\ 12 & 0.109 & 28 & 0.307 \\ 14 & 0.120 & 30 & 0.368 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Estimate the theoretical fracture strength of a brittle material if it is known that fracture occurs by the propagation of an elliptically shaped surface crack of length \(0.25 \mathrm{~mm}(0.01\) in.) and having a tip radius of curvature of \(1.2\) \(\times 10^{-3} \mathrm{~mm}\left(4.7 \times 10^{-5} \mathrm{in} .\right)\) when a stress of \(1200 \mathrm{MPa}(174,000 \mathrm{psi})\) is applied.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

Measurements

Read Explanation

Electricity

Read Explanation

Magnetism

Read Explanation

Radiation

Read Explanation

Astrophysics

Read Explanation

Magnetism and Electromagnetic Induction

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free