Contrast compression, injection, and transfer molding techniques that are used to form plastic materials.

Question: Compare and contrast compression molding, injection molding, and transfer molding in terms of their advantages and disadvantages when forming plastic materials. Answer: Compression molding has low tooling costs, is suitable for large and simple parts, can process high-temperature resins, and is suitable for high-volume production. However, it is limited to simple shapes, has a slow production rate, and high labor costs. Injection molding offers a high production rate, is suitable for complex shapes and small parts, has higher repeatability, and is great for mass production. However, it has high initial setup and tooling costs, is limited to relatively small parts, and mold design can be time-consuming. Transfer molding is suitable for complex and intricate shapes, has better control over material flow, and allows for easier molding of inserts. However, it has a slower production rate, higher initial setup and tooling costs, and is limited to smaller parts compared to compression molding.