Cite the differences between type I and type II superconductors.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: List the key differences between type I and type II superconductors. Answer: The key differences between type I and type II superconductors are: 1. Type I superconductors are made of pure metals or metalloids, while type II superconductors are compound or alloy-based. 2. Type I superconductors do not permit any magnetic field penetration below their critical temperature, while type II superconductors allow partial magnetic field penetration in a mixed state. 3. Type I superconductors have a single critical magnetic field, while type II superconductors have two critical magnetic fields. 4. Type I superconductors have low critical temperatures, while type II superconductors have higher critical temperatures, making them more practical for various applications.

Step by step solution

01

Define Type I and Type II superconductors

Type I superconductors are materials that exhibit a complete loss of electrical resistance without allowing any magnetic field penetration when cooled below their critical temperature. These superconductors are usually made of pure metals or metalloids. Type II superconductors, on the other hand, are more commonly alloys or compound-based and allow partial penetration of magnetic fields when cooled below their critical temperature. This leads to a mixed state of normal and superconducting phases in the presence of a magnetic field, which is not present in type I superconductors.
02

Discuss the Critical Magnetic Field

One of the main differences between type I and type II superconductors is their behavior in the presence of a magnetic field. Type I superconductors have a single critical magnetic field (H_c). When the external magnetic field is below this value, the material is in a superconducting state. If the magnetic field is increased above this critical value, the material becomes non-superconducting. This property is due to the Meissner effect, where a superconductor expels all magnetic fields from its interior below H_c. Type II superconductors, however, have two critical magnetic fields (H_c1 and H_c2). When the magnetic field is below H_c1, the material is fully superconducting, and the Meissner effect is observed. When the magnetic field is between H_c1 and H_c2, a mixed state of superconducting and normal phases occurs – known as the vortex state or the Abrikosov lattice. If the magnetic field is above H_c2, the superconductivity is destroyed, and the material becomes fully normal.
03

Explain the Critical Temperature

Type I superconductors have relatively simple crystal structures and low critical temperatures (usually below 30 K). Type II superconductors have more complex structures with higher critical temperatures, in some cases reaching up to 130 K. These higher critical temperatures make type II superconductors more practical for technological applications, as they can be maintained in their superconducting state with less expensive cooling.
04

Discuss Applications

Type I superconductors are limited in their applications due to their low critical temperatures and strict intolerance of magnetic fields. They are mainly used for applications such as low-temperature research and, in some cases, are used as superconducting magnets. Type II superconductors have a wide range of applications due to their higher critical temperatures and ability to withstand magnetic fields in the mixed state. These superconductors are used in high-field magnets and devices such as MRI machines, power cables, magnetic levitation trains, and particle accelerators.
05

Conclusion

In conclusion, the main differences between type I and type II superconductors are: 1. Type I superconductors are made of pure metals or metalloids, whereas type II superconductors are usually compound or alloy-based. 2. Type I superconductors do not permit any magnetic field penetration below their critical temperature, while type II superconductors allow partial magnetic field penetration in a mixed state. 3. Type I superconductors have a single critical magnetic field, while type II superconductors have two critical magnetic fields. 4. Type I superconductors have low critical temperatures, while type II superconductors have higher critical temperatures, making them more practical for various applications.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Briefly explain the manner in which information is stored magnetically.

Briefly explain why the magnitude of the saturation magnetization decreases with increasing temperature for ferromagnetic materials, and why ferromagnetic behavior ceases above the Curie temperature.

It is possible to express the magnetic susceptibility \(\chi_{m}\) in several different units. For the discussion in this chapter, \(\chi_{m}\) is used to designate the volume susceptibility in SI units-that is, the quantity that gives the magnetization per unit volume \(\left(\mathrm{m}^{3}\right)\) of material when multiplied by \(H\). The mass susceptibility \(\chi_{m}(\mathrm{~kg})\) yields the magnetic moment (or magnetization) per kilogram of material when multiplied by \(H\); similarly, the atomic susceptibility \(\chi_{m}\) (a) gives the magnetization per kilogram-mole. The last two quantities are related to \(\chi_{m}\) through the following relationships: $$ \begin{aligned} &\chi_{m}=\chi_{m}(\mathrm{~kg}) \times \text { mass density }\left(\text { in } \mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\right) \\ &\chi_{m}(a)=\chi_{m}(\mathrm{~kg}) \times \text { atomic weight }(\text { in } \mathrm{kg}) \end{aligned} $$ When using the cgs-emu system, comparable parameters exist that may be designated by \(\chi_{m}^{\prime}\), \(\chi_{m}^{\prime}(\mathrm{g})\), and \(\chi_{m}^{\prime}(a) ;\) the \(\chi_{m}\) and \(\chi_{m}^{\prime}\) are related in accordance with Table 20.1. From Table 20.2, \(\chi_{m}\) for copper is \(-0.96 \times 10^{-5}\); convert this value into the other five susceptibilities.

A ferromagnetic material has a remanence of \(1.0\) tesla and a coercivity of \(15,000 \mathrm{~A} / \mathrm{m}\). Saturation is achieved at a magnetic field strength of \(25,000 \mathrm{~A} / \mathrm{m}\), at which the flux density is \(1.25\) teslas. Using these data, sketch the entire hysteresis curve in the range \(H=-25,000\) to \(+25,000 \mathrm{~A} / \mathrm{m}\). Be sure to scale and label both coordinate axes.

A coil of wire \(0.5 \mathrm{~m}\) long and having 20 turns carries a current of \(1.0 \mathrm{~A}\). (a) Compute the flux density if the coil is within a vacuum. (b) A bar of an iron-silicon alloy, the \(B-H\) behavior for which is shown in Figure \(20.29\), is positioned within the coil. What is the flux density within this bar? (c) Suppose that a bar of molybdenum is now situated within the coil. What current must be used to produce the same \(B\) field in the Mo as was produced in the iron-silicon alloy (part b) using \(1.0 \mathrm{~A}\) ?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free