In ionic materials, how does the size of the component ions affect the extent of electronic polarization?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The size of component ions in ionic materials directly affects the extent of electronic polarization. Larger ions have higher polarizability, leading to a greater degree of electronic polarization, while smaller ions have lower polarizability and less electronic polarization. This is due to the larger electron cloud in bigger ions, which is more easily distorted by external electric fields created by neighboring ions in the lattice structure.

Step by step solution

01

Understand electronic polarization

Electronic polarization refers to the distortion of the electron cloud around an ion due to the influence of an external electric field, which can be from neighboring ions in the lattice structure. In an ionic material, ions of opposite charge attract each other, and the electron cloud is distorted when an ion approaches another ion.
02

Factors affecting electronic polarization

Electronic polarization depends on several factors, such as the magnitude of the external electric field (which depends on the charge and distance between the ions), the polarizability of the ion (the ability of the ion to be polarized), and the size of the component ions. Larger ions are more polarizable simply because they have more electrons and a larger electron cloud, which is more easily distorted.
03

Relate the size of component ions to electronic polarization

In ionic materials, the extent of electronic polarization is directly related to the size of component ions. Larger ions result in a higher polarizability, which in turn means a greater degree of electronic polarization. Conversely, smaller ions have lower polarizability, and hence, less electronic polarization.
04

Explain the relationship with examples

To illustrate this relationship, let's consider two ionic materials, NaCl and CsF. NaCl consists of sodium (Na+) and chloride (Cl-) ions, both relatively small in size, while CsF consists of cesium (Cs+) and fluoride (F-) ions, which are considerably larger. The Cs+ ion has an ionic radius of about 174 pm, while the Na+ ion has a significantly smaller ionic radius of about 102 pm. Similarly, the F- ion has an ionic radius of about 133 pm, and the Cl- ion has an ionic radius of about 181 pm. As a result, electronic polarization is more significant in CsF than in NaCl. The large cesium and fluoride ions cause a greater distortion of the electron cloud compared to the smaller sodium and chloride ions, leading to increased electronic polarization in the latter ionic material. In conclusion, the size of component ions in ionic materials directly affects the extent of electronic polarization. Larger ions result in a greater degree of electronic polarization due to their increased polarizability.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Briefly explain how reflection losses of transparent materials are minimized by thin surface coatings.

At the end of Section \(21.14\) it was noted that the intensity of light absorbed while passing through a \(16-\mathrm{km}\) length of optical fiber glass is equivalent to the light intensity absorbed through a \(25-\mathrm{mm}\) thickness of ordinary window glass. Calculate the absorption coefficient \(\beta\) of the optical fiber glass if the value of \(\beta\) for the window glass is \(10^{-4} \mathrm{~mm}^{-1}\).

Compute the velocity of light in diamond, which has a dielectric constant \(\epsilon_{r}\) of \(5.5\) (at frequencies within the visible range) and a magnetic susceptibility of \(-2.17 \times 10^{-5}\)

Using the data in Table \(21.1\), estimate the dielectric constants for silica glass (fused silica), soda-lime glass, polytetrafluoroethylene, polyethylene, and polystyrene, and compare these values with those cited in the following table. Briefly explain any discrepancies. \begin{tabular}{lc} \hline Material & Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) \\ \hline Silica glass & \(3.8\) \\ \hline Soda-lime glass & \(6.9\) \\ \hline Polytetrafluoroethylene & \(2.1\) \\ \hline Polyethylene & \(2.3\) \\ \hline Polystyrene & \(2.6\) \\ \hline \end{tabular}

The transmissivity \(T\) of a transparent material \(15 \mathrm{~mm}\) thick to normally incident light is \(0.80\). If the index of refraction of this material is \(1.5\), compute the thickness of material that yields a transmissivity of \(0.70\). All reflection losses should be considered.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free