Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 7: Problem 3

Is it possible for two screw dislocations of opposite sign to annihilate each other? Explain your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: No, two screw dislocations of opposite sign cannot fully annihilate each other like edge dislocations. When they interact, they create a new screw dislocation with a Burgers vector equal to the sum of the initial dislocations, but they do not return the lattice to a perfect state.

Step by step solution

01

Define Screw Dislocations

In crystallography, a screw dislocation is a type of linear defect that occurs within a crystal lattice. It is the result of the lattice atoms shifting along a helical path around the dislocation line. A screw dislocation can either be right-handed (positive) or left-handed (negative), depending on the direction of the helical atomic path around the dislocation.
02

Define Edge Dislocations

Edge dislocations, on the other hand, are linear defects that result from the termination of a plane of atoms within a crystal lattice. These dislocations cause an extra half-plane of atoms in the lattice and can be positive and negative as well.
03

Annihilation of Dislocations

Dislocations of opposite sign can annihilate each other to reduce the net Burgers vector, which describes the magnitude and direction of a dislocation. For example, when an edge dislocation with a positive Burgers vector meets a negative edge dislocation of the same magnitude, both lattice defects are canceled out, returning the lattice to a more perfect state.
04

Interaction of Screw Dislocations

Now let's consider the interaction between two screw dislocations with opposite signs. If they are brought close to each other, the helical atomic paths of the lattice atoms around both dislocation lines will not interlock or mean the perfect crystal lattice state. Instead, they form a new screw dislocation with a Burgers vector equal to the sum of two original dislocations. Since the right-handed and left-handed screw dislocations are of opposite nature, their Burgers vectors are non-collinear in the screw dislocation case.
05

Conclusion

In conclusion, it is not possible for two screw dislocations of opposite sign to fully annihilate each other like edge dislocations. When they interact, they create a new screw dislocation with a Burgers vector equal to the sum of the initial dislocations, but they do not return the lattice to a perfect state.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a cylindrical nickel wire \(2.0 \mathrm{~mm}\) \(\left(0.08\right.\) in.) in diameter and \(3 \times 10^{4} \mathrm{~mm}\) (1200 in.) long. Calculate its elongation when a load of \(300 \mathrm{~N}\left(67 \mathrm{lb}_{t}\right)\) is applied. Assume that the defor-

To provide some perspective on the dimensions of atomic defects, consider a metal specimen with a dislocation density of \(10^{5} \mathrm{~mm}^{-2}\). Suppose that all the dislocations in \(1000 \mathrm{~mm}^{3}\left(1 \mathrm{~cm}^{3}\right)\) were somehow removed and linked end to end. How far (in miles) would this chain extend? Now suppose that the density is increased to \(10^{9} \mathrm{~mm}^{-2}\) by cold working. What would be the chain length of dislocations in \(1000 \mathrm{~mm}^{3}\) of material?

In Section \(2.6\), it was noted that the net bonding energy \(E_{N}\) between two isolated positive and negative ions is a function of interionic distance \(r\) as follows: $$ E_{N}=-\frac{A}{r}+\frac{B}{r^{n}} $$ where \(A, B\), and \(n\) are constants for the particular ion pair. Equation \(6.31\) is also valid for the bonding energy between adjacent ions in solid materials. The modulus of elasticity \(E\) is proportional to the slope of the interionic force-separation curve at the equilibrium interionic separation; that is,Derive an expression for the dependence of the modulus of elasticity on these \(A, B\), and \(n\) parameters (for the two-ion system), using the following procedure: 1\. Establish a relationship for the force \(F\) as a function of \(r\), realizing that $$ F=\frac{d E_{N}}{d r} $$ 2\. Now take the derivative \(d F / d r\). 3\. Develop an expression for \(r_{0}\), the equilibrium separation. Because \(r_{0}\) corresponds to the value of \(r\) at the minimum of the \(E_{N}\)-versus- \(r\) curve (Figure 2.10b), take the derivative \(d E_{N} / d r\), set it equal to zero, and solve for \(r\), which corresponds to \(r_{0}\) - 4\. Finally, substitute this expression for \(r_{0}\) into the relationship obtained by taking \(d F / d r\).

The following yield strength, grain diameter, and heat treatment time (for grain growth) data were gathered for an iron specimen that was heat treated at \(800^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Using these data, compute the yield strength of a specimen that was heated at \(800^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) for \(3 \mathrm{~h}\). Assume a value of 2 for \(n\), the grain diameter exponent. $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Grain } \\ \text { diameter } \\ (\mathbf{m m}) \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Yield } \\ \text { Strength } \\ \text { (MPa) } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Heat } \\ \text { Treating } \\ \text { Time (h) } \end{array} \\ \hline 0.028 & 300 & 10 \\ \hline 0.010 & 385 & 1 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

(a) What is the driving force for recrystallization? (b) What is the driving force for grain growth?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

Magnetism

Read Explanation

Measurements

Read Explanation

Magnetism and Electromagnetic Induction

Read Explanation

Force

Read Explanation

Dynamics

Read Explanation

Physics of Motion

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free