Show that the system $$ \frac{d x}{d t}=-2 y, \quad \frac{d y}{d t}=x-5, $$ has closed elliptical orbits. (Hint: Consider first transforming \(x\) to \(x-5\) and \(y\) to \(y / 2\) and then using a polar transformation.)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The system has closed elliptical orbits centered at (5, 0).

Step by step solution

01

- Transform the system

Transform the variables: let \(x' = x - 5\) and \(y' = \frac{y}{2}\). Substitute these into the original differential equations.
02

- Substitution into original equations

For \(dx\) with the transformation, we have \(dx' = dx\), so \(\frac{dx'}{dt} = \frac{dx}{dt}\). For \(dy\), we have \(dy' = \frac{1}{2}dy\), hence \(\frac{dy'}{dt} = \frac{1}{2} \frac{dy}{dt}\). Substituting these into the original system gives: \[\frac{dx'}{dt} = -4y', \quad \frac{dy'}{dt} = x'\].
03

- Use polar coordinates

Consider the polar transformation with \(x' = r \cos(\theta)\) and \(y' = r \sin(\theta)\). This changes our equations to polar form.
04

- Transform the differential equations

Using the chain rule for polar coordinates, \(\frac{dx'}{dt} = \cos(\theta) \frac{dr}{dt} - r \sin(\theta) \frac{d\theta}{dt}\) and similarly for \(y'\). Substituting these into our transformed system:\[-4r \sin(\theta) = \cos(\theta) \frac{dr}{dt} - r \sin(\theta) \frac{d\theta}{dt}\] \[r \cos(\theta) = \sin(\theta) \frac{dr}{dt} + r \cos(\theta) \frac{d\theta}{dt}\].
05

- Solve for \(\frac{dr}{dt}\) and \(\frac{d\theta}{dt}\)

By equating coefficients for \(\sin(\theta)\) and \(\cos(\theta)\) we get: \(\frac{dr}{dt} = 0\) (so \(r\) is constant) and \(\frac{d\theta}{dt} = -4\). Recall that \(r\) constant implies a circular motion in polar coordinates.
06

- Verify elliptical shape

Returning to Cartesian coordinates with \(x' = x - 5\) and \(y' = \frac{y}{2}\), and recognizing we have a proportional relationship, the curves are ellipses centered at (5, 0).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

polar coordinates transformation
To better understand elliptical orbits, we first transform the system's coordinates from Cartesian to polar. Polar coordinates describe a point in terms of its distance from a reference point (called the radius, \( r \)) and the angle formed with a reference direction (called the angle, \( \theta \)).
This transformation simplifies the analysis of problems where symmetry and rotation are involved. By converting the variables \( x \) and \( y \) into polar coordinates, we can leverage trigonometric relationships to further simplify the differential equations. For our problem, the new transformed coordinates become \( x' = r \cos(\theta) \) and \( y' = r \sin(\theta) \).
This helps us deal with the motion and behavior of the system more intuitively.
closed orbits
A key element to recognize in this problem is the presence of closed orbits. Closed orbits imply that the motion of the system repeats itself in a cyclical pattern, forming closed loops.
For the system \( \frac{dx}{dt} = -2y \) and \( \frac{dy}{dt} = x - 5 \), transforming to a new set of variables allows us to see these closed orbits more clearly. The transformation \( x' = x - 5 \) and \( y' = \frac{y}{2} \) is used to shift and scale the original variables.
Through this transformation, it becomes easier to analyze the phase space of the system and identify the elliptical paths that represent the closed orbits.
differential system transformation
Transforming a differential system is often necessary to make complicated systems more tractable. For our system, we start by redefining \( x \) and \( y \) as \( x' = x - 5 \) and \( y' = \frac{y}{2} \).
Next, we substitute these new variables into the original differential equations. This gives us a transformed system: \( \frac{dx'}{dt} = -4y' \) and \( \frac{dy'}{dt} = x' \).
The goal is to simplify the equations, making them easier to solve or analyze. By choosing appropriate transformations, we can often reduce the complexity of the system, revealing underlying structures or symmetries.
chain rule
The chain rule is essential when dealing with transformations, particularly in differential equations. It relates the rate of change of a function to the rates of change of its variables.
For instance, when we transform our variables to polar coordinates, we need the chain rule to express how derivatives like \( \frac{dx'}{dt} \) and \( \frac{dy'}{dt} \) change according to \( \frac{dr}{dt} \) and \( \frac{d\theta}{dt} \).
  • For \( x' \), we have \( \frac{dx'}{dt} = \cos(\theta) \frac{dr}{dt} - r \sin(\theta) \frac{d\theta}{dt} \).
  • Similarly, for \( y' \), we have \( \frac{dy'}{dt} = \sin(\theta) \frac{dr}{dt} + r \cos(\theta) \frac{d\theta}{dt} \).
Using the chain rule correctly allows us to connect Cartesian and polar derivatives seamlessly.
constant radius in polar coordinates
Understanding the concept of constant radius in polar coordinates is crucial, especially when dealing with closed orbits. In a system where the radius \( r \) does not change over time \( \left( \frac{dr}{dt} = 0 \right) \), the motion is constrained to a circle in the polar plane.
In our problem, we found that \( \frac{dr}{dt} = 0 \), indicating that \( r \) remains constant. This simplifies the analysis and shows that the closed orbits are circles, which in this transformed context translate to ellipses in the original coordinates.
This insight helps us conclude that the original system features elliptical orbits, providing a clear visualization of the motion dynamics.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Morris and Lecar (1981) describe a semiqualitative model for voltage oscillations in the giant muscle fiber of the barnacle. In this system the important ions are potassium and calcium (not sodium). The equations they suggest are the following: $$ \begin{aligned} I &=C \frac{d v}{d t}+g_{\mathrm{L}}\left(v-v_{\mathrm{L}}\right)+g \mathrm{ca} M\left(v-v_{\mathrm{Ca}}\right)+g_{\mathrm{K}} N\left(v-v_{\mathrm{K}}\right) \\ \frac{d M}{d t} &=\lambda_{M}(v)\left[M_{=}(v)-M\right] \\ \frac{d N}{d t} &=\lambda_{v}(v)\left[N_{=}(v)-N\right] \end{aligned} $$ where $$ \begin{aligned} v &=\text { voltage, } \\ M &=\text { fraction of open } \mathrm{Ca}^{2+} \text { channels, } \\ N &=\text { fraction of open } \mathrm{K}^{+} \text {channels. } \end{aligned} $$ (a) Interpret these three equations. For reasons detailed in their papers Morris and Lecar define the functions \(M_{\infty}, \lambda_{s}, N_{*}\), and \(\lambda_{N}\) as follows: $$ \begin{array}{ll} M_{\infty}(v)=\frac{1}{2}\left(1+\tanh \frac{v-v_{1}}{v_{2}}\right), & N_{\infty}(v)=\frac{1}{2}\left(1+\tanh \frac{v-v_{3}}{v_{4}}\right), \\ \lambda_{M}(v)=\lambda_{M} \cosh \frac{v-v_{1}}{2 v_{2}}, & \lambda_{N}(v)=\bar{\lambda}_{N} \cosh \frac{v-v_{3}}{2 v_{4}} \end{array} $$ (b) Sketch or describe the voltage dependence of these functions. $$ \text { Note: } \begin{aligned} \cosh x &=\frac{e^{x}+e^{-x}}{2}, \quad \sinh x=\frac{e^{x}-e^{-x}}{2} \\ \tanh x &=\frac{\sinh x}{\cosh x} \end{aligned} $$ (c) Morris and Lecar consider the reduced \(v N\) system to be an approximation to the whole model. What assumption underlies this approximation? (d) Show that in the reduced \(\mathrm{vN}\) system the variables are constrained to satisfy the following inequalities: $$ \begin{aligned} 0 &

Use Bendixson's negative criterion to show that if \(P\) is an isolated saddle point there cannot be a limit cycle in the neighborhood of \(P\) that contains only \(P\).

Consider the nonlinear system of equations $$ \begin{aligned} &\frac{d x}{d t}=-y+x\left(x^{2}+y^{2}-1\right)=f(x, y), \\ &\frac{d y}{d t}=x+y\left(x^{2}+y^{2}-1\right)=g(x, y) . \end{aligned} $$ Show that \(r=1\) is an unstable limit cycle of the equations.

Lefschetz (1977) discusses the following system of equations $$ \begin{aligned} &\frac{d x}{d t}=-y+x f\left(x^{2}+y^{2}\right) \\ &\frac{d y}{d t}=x+y f\left(x^{2}+y^{2}\right) \end{aligned} $$ Show that this system is equivalent to the polar equation $$ \frac{d r}{d \theta}=r f\left(r^{2}\right) \text {. } $$

Consider a system of equations such as ( \(1 a, b\) ). Transform variables by defining \(x=r \cos \theta, \quad y=r \sin \theta .\) (a) Show that $$ r^{2}=x^{2}+y^{2}, \quad \theta=\arctan \frac{y}{x} . $$ (b) Show that $$ \frac{1}{2} \frac{d\left(r^{2}\right)}{d t}=x \frac{d x}{d t}+y \frac{d y}{d t} $$ (c) Verify that $$ r^{2} \frac{d \theta}{d t}=x \frac{d y}{d t}-y \frac{d x}{d t} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free