For a disk of radius R=20cm and Q=6×10-6C, calculate the electric field 2 mm from the center of the disk using all three equations:

role="math" localid="1656928965291" E=(Q/A)2ε0[1-z(R2+z)1/2]

EQ/A2e0[1-zR],andEQ/A2e0

How good are the approximate equations at this distance? For the same disk, calculate E at a distance of 5 cm (50 mm) using all three equations. How good are the approximate equations at this distance?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The approximate equations for the electric field only give an accurate answer for the distance nearer to the centre of the disk, that is, for 1 mm and a less precise solution for the distance away from the centre, i.e., 5 cm.

Step by step solution

01

Identification of given data

The given data can be listed below,

  • The radius of the disk is,R=20cm
  • The charge on the disk is,Q=6×1010-6C
02

Concept/Significance of electric field

An electric field is a mathematical construct that represents the amount and direction of the net electrical force experienced by a unit of electrical charge at a particular place in space as a result of interaction with all other electrical charges in the area.

03

Determination of the electric field 2 mm from the center of the disk using all three equations

The equations for electric field are given by,

E=(Q/A)2ε0[1-z(R2+z)1/2] …(i)

E=Q/A2ε0[1-zR] …(ii)

E=Q/A2ε0 …(iii)

Substitute values in the equation (i)

E=(6×10-6C/π0.20m22×8.85×10-12C2/Nm21-2×10-3m0.20m2+2×10-3m2=0.027×10100.99N/C=2.67×108N/C

Substitute all the values in the equation (ii).

E=0.477×10-2C/m17.7×10-12C2/Nm21-2×10-3m0.20m=2.66×108N/C

Substitute all the values in equation (iii)

E=(6×10-6C/π0.20m22×8.85×10-12C2/Nm2=0.477×10-2C/m17.7×10-12C2/Nm2=2.69×108N/C

The approximate equations give the accurate and same answers for 2 mm distance

04

Step 4: Determination of the electric field at a distance of 5 cm (50 mm) using all three equations

Substitute values in equation (i), (ii), (iii) for the electric field at a distance of 5 cm.

E=(6×10-6C/π0.20m22×8.85×10-12C2/Nm21-5×10-2m0.20m2+5×10-3m2=0.027×10100.75N/C=2.04×108N/C

Substitute values inequation (ii)

E=0.477×10-2C/m17.7×10-12C2/Nm21-5×10-3m0.20m=2.02×108N/C

Substitute all the values in equation (iii)

E=(6×10-6C/π0.20m22×8.85×10-12C2/Nm2=0.477×10-2C/m17.7×10-12C2/Nm2=2.69×108N/C

The approximate equations do not give same answers for 5 mm distance

Thus, the approximate equations for the electric field only give an accurate answer for the distance nearer to the centre of the disk, that is, for 1 mm and a less precise solution for the distance away from the centre, i.e., 5 cm.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A student claimed that the equation for the electric field outside a cube of edge length L, carrying a uniformly distributed charge Q, at a distance x from the center of the cube, was

14πδo50QLx3

Explain how you know that this cannot be the right equation.

Question: Breakdown field strength for air is roughly . If the electric field is greater than this value, the air becomes a conductor. (a) There is a limit to the amount of charge that you can put on a metal sphere in air. If you slightly exceed this limit, why would breakdown occur, and why would the breakdown occur very near the surface of the sphere, rather than somewhere else? (b) How much excess charge can you put on a metal sphere of radius without causing breakdown in the neighboring air, which would discharge the sphere? (c) How much excess charge can you put on a metal sphere of onlyradius? These results hint at the reason why a highly charged piece of metal tends to spark at places where the radius of curvature is small, or at places where there are sharp points.

Consider a thin plastic rod bent into a semicircular arc of radius Rwith center at the origin (Figure 15.57). The rod carries a uniformly distributed negative charge -Q.

(a) Determine the electric field Eat the origin contributed by the rod. Include carefully labeled diagrams, and be sure to check your result. (b) An ion with charge -2eand mass is placed at rest at the origin. After a very short time tthe ion has moved only a very short distance but has acquired some momentum .PCalculate P.

A large, thin plastic disk with radiusR = 1.5 m carries a uniformly distributed charge of −Q = −3 × 10−5 C as shown in Figure 15.59. A circular piece of aluminum foil is placed d = 3 mm from the disk, parallel to the disk. The foil has a radius of r = 2 cm and a thickness t = 1 mm.


(a) Show the charge distribution on the close-up of the foil. (b) Calculate the magnitude and direction of the electric field at location × at the center of the foil, inside the foil. (c) Calculate the magnitude q of the charge on the left circular face of the foil.

Question: A glass sphere carrying a uniformly distributed charge of is surrounded by an initially neutral spherical plastic shell (Figure 15.67).

(a) Qualitatively, indicate the polarization of the plastic. (b) Qualitatively, indicate the polarization of the inner glass sphere. Explain briefly. (c) Is the electric field at location P outside the plastic shell larger, smaller, or the same as it would be if the plastic weren’t there? Explain briefly. (d) Now suppose that the glass sphere carrying a uniform charge of is surrounded by an initially neutral metal shell (Figure 15.68). Qualitatively, indicate the polarization of the metal.

e) Now be quantitative about the polarization of the metal sphere and prove your assertions. (f) Is the electric field at location outside the metal shell larger, smaller, or the same as it would be if the metal shell weren’t there? Explain briefly.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free