The accompanying diagrams represent the three lowest energy wave functions for three "atoms." As in all truly molecular states we consider, these states are shared among the atoms. At such large atomic separation, however, the energies are practically equal, so anelectron would be just as happy occupying any combination.

(a) Identify algebraic combinations of the states (for instance, 5+11/2+11/2 ) that would place the electron in each of the three atoms.

(b) Were the atoms closer together, the energies of states 1.11, and III would spread out and an electron would occupy the lowest energy one. Rank them in order of increasing energy as the atoms draw closer together. Explain your reasoning.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The combination for first atom is l+ll-2lll , for second atom is I - II and for third atom is l+ll-2lll .

(b) The rank of the energies in increasing order is El<Elll<Ell.

Step by step solution

01

Given data

The diagram that represents the three lowest energy wave function for three atoms is given in figure 1 asl, ll, lll .

The energies are practically equal to each other.

02

Concept of the linear combination of the three states

The expression for the linear combination of the three states is given as:

l+a ll+b lll

Where, a and b are the two coefficients.

03

Step 3:Calculate the linear combination of three states

(a)

The states of each atom are denoted by the signs that represent the wave function.

State I is denoted as, l+1,+2,+3 >.

State II is denoted as, l+1,+2,+3 > .

State III is denoted as, l-1,+3 > .

Calculate the linear combination of three states as follows:

l+all+blll=l+1,+2,+3>+al+1,2,+3>+bl-1,+3>=l1+a-b+1.1-a+2.1+a+b+3>

If the electron is kept only in first atom, the electron cannot be in second or third atom and their function is taken equal to zero.

1-a=0a=-11+a+b=0b=-2

Similarly, if the electron is kept in second atom, the function of first and third atom is taken equal to zero.

1+a-b=01+a-b=0a=-1b=0

Similarly, if the electron is kept in third atom, the function of first and second atom is equal to zero.

1+a-b=01-a=0a=1b=2

Thus, the combination for first atom is l+ll-2lll , for second atom is l-ll and for third atom is l+ll+2lll .

04

Determine the rank of the energies in increasing order

(b)

The wave function of the energy is directly proportional to the wave number.

The atoms are closer together and their energies of each state will spread out and the electron will take the place that has lowest energy.

As the wave function's energy varies directly to its wave number.

Since the atoms are closer to each other, the state I will form one distorted anti-node, state II will have three anti-nodes and state III will have two antinodes.

Thus, the state I has the lowest energy and state II has the highest energy.

Thus, the energies in increasing order areEl<Elll<Ell.

Therefore, the rank of the energies in increasing order is El<Elll<Ell.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is Cooper pair, and what role does it play in superconductivity?

Section 10.6 notes that as causes of resistance, ionic vibrations give way to lattice imperfections at around 10 K. A typical spring constant between atoms in a solid is or order of magnitude103Nm and typical spacing is nominally10-10m . Estimate how much the vibrating atoms locations might deviate, as a function of their normal separations, at 10 K.

Based only on the desire to limit minority carriers, why would silicon be preferable to germanium as a fabric for doped semiconductors?

A string wrapped around a hub of radius Rpulls with force FT on an object that rolls without slipping along horizontal rails on "wheels" of radiusr<R. Assume a massmand rotational inertia I.

(a) Prove that the ratio ofFTto the object's acceleration is negative. (Note: This object can't roll without slipping unless there is friction.) You can do this by actually calculating the acceleration from the translational and rotational second la was of motion, but it is possible to answer this part without such a "real" calculation.

(b) Verify thatFTtimes the speed at which the string moves in the direction of FT (i.e., the power delivered byFT) equals the rate at which the translational and rotational kinetic energies increase. That is.FTdoes all the work in this system, while the "internal" force does none. (c) Briefly discuss how parts (a) and (b) correspond to behaviors when an external electric field is applied to a semiconductor.

Show that for a room-temperature semiconductor with a band gap of 1eV, a temperature rise of 4K would raise the conductivity by about 30%.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free