A study of classical waves tells us that a standing wave can be expressed as a sum of two travelling waves. Quantum-Mechanical travelling waves, discussed in Chapter 4, is of the form ψ(x,t)=Aei(kx=ωt). Show that the infinite well’s standing wave function can be expressed as a sum of two traveling waves.

Short Answer

Expert verified

ψ(x,t)=2Aisin(kx)e-iex

What we ended up with is the indefinite-well’s standing-wave function, thus proving it is just the sum of two waves moving in opposite directions.

Step by step solution

01

Step (1): Introduction

To show that the infinite well’s standing-wave function can be expressed as the sum of two travelling waves, we add two waves moving in opposite directions.

02

Step (2): Finding sum of two waves

The equation for each wave is

ψ(x,t)=Aei(kx-ωt)

Since our two waves are moving in opposite directions, they have opposite momentum(so our second wave is negative) and an opposite sign for K. This gives us equation for the sum of the travelling waves:

ψ(x,t)=Ae(kx-ωt)

So,role="math" localid="1658425779738" ψ(x,t)=Aei(kx-ωt)-Aei(kx-ωt)=Aei(kx-ωt)eikx-e-ikx=2Aieikx-e-ikx2ieiex

We know that,

eikx-e-ikx2i=sinkx

Thus,

ψ(x,t)=2Aisin(kx)e-iex

What we ended up with is the indefinite-well’s standing-wave function, thus proving it is just the sum of two waves moving in opposite directions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In several bound systems, the quantum-mechanically allowed energies depend on a single quantum number we found in section 5.5 that the energy levels in an infinite well are given by, En=a1n2wheren=1,2,3.....andis a constant. (Actually, we known whata1is but it would only distract us here.) section 5.7 showed that for a harmonic oscillator, they areEn=a2(n12), wheren=1,2,3.....(using ann12with n strictly positive is equivalent towith n non negative.) finally, for a hydrogen atom, a bound system that we study in chapter 7,En=a3n2, wheren=1,2,3.....consider particles making downwards transition between the quantized energy levels, each transition producing a photon, for each of these three systems, is there a minimum photon wavelength? A maximum ? it might be helpful to make sketches of the relative heights of the energy levels in each case.

There are mathematical solutions to the Schrödinger equation for the finite well for any energy, and in fact. They can be made smooth everywhere. Guided by A Closer Look: Solving the Finite Well. Show this as follows:

(a) Don't throw out any mathematical solutions. That is in region Il (x<0), assume that (Ce+ax+De-ax), and in region III (x>L), assume thatψ(x)=Fe+ax+Ge-ax. Write the smoothness conditions.

(b) In Section 5.6. the smoothness conditions were combined to eliminate A,Band Gin favor of C. In the remaining equation. Ccanceled. leaving an equation involving only kand α, solvable for only certain values of E. Why can't this be done here?

(c) Our solution is smooth. What is still wrong with it physically?

(d) Show that

localid="1660137122940" D=12(B-kαA)andF=12e-αL[(A-Bkα)sin(kL)+(Akα+B)cos(kL)]

and that setting these offending coefficients to 0 reproduces quantization condition (5-22).

What is the probability that the particle would be found between x = 0and x = 1/a?

Quantum-mechanical stationary states are of the general form Ψ(x,t)=ψ(x)e-iωt. For the basic plane wave (Chapter 4), this is Ψ(x,t)=Aeikxe-iωt=Aei(kx-ωt), and for a particle in a box it is Asinkxe-iωt. Although both are sinusoidal, we claim that the plane wave alone is the prototype function whose momentum is pure-a well-defined value in one direction. Reinforcing the claim is the fact that the plane wave alone lacks features that we expect to see only when, effectively, waves are moving in both directions. What features are these, and, considering the probability densities, are they indeed present for a particle in a box and absent for a plane wave?

To show that the potential energy of finite well is U=h2(n1)28mL2

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free