Where would a particle in the first excited state (first above ground) of an infinite well most likely be found?

Short Answer

Expert verified

A particle in the first excited state of an infinite well most likely be found atx=L4andx=3L4 .

Step by step solution

01

Formula used.

A particle is in the first excited state, n=2.

The wavefunction for an infinite well is given by

localid="1657615959392" ψn(x)=2Lsin(nπxL)(1)

Where nis the number of energy states and localid="1657616755075" Lis the width of an infinite well

The expression for probability is given by

Pn(x)=ψn(x)*ψn(x)(2)

02

Calculation.

for the first excited state, n=2.

Substitute the value of n in equation (1)

localid="1659187597446" ψn(x)=2Lsin(2πxL)

Hence, the probability is

P2(x)=Ψ2(x)*Ψ2(x)=2Lsin2(2πxL)

To find the most probable position of a particle in the energy state, maximize the probability P2(x)That is,

dP2(x)dx=2(2L)sin(2πxL)cos(2πxL)(2πL)=2π(4L2)sin(2πxL)cos(2πxL)

The quantitydP2(x)dx=0

whenx=0,L4,L2,3L4,L.

But whenx=0,L2,L

the wavefunctionψ2(x)=0.

Thus, the probability of finding the particle is zero.

x=0,L2,L

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Equation (5 - 16) gives infinite well energies. Because equation (5 - 22) cannot be solved in closed form, there is no similar compact formula for finite well energies. Still many conclusions can be drawn without one. Argue on largely qualitative grounds that if the walls of a finite well are moved close together but not changed in height, then the well must progressively hold fewer bound states. (Make a clear connection between the width of the well and the height of the walls.)

Equation 5-16 gives infinite well energies. Because equation 5-22 cannot be solved in closed form, there is no similar compact formula for finite well energies. Still many conclusions can be drawn without one. Argue on largely qualitative grounds that if the walls of a finite well are moved close together but not changed in height, then the well must progressively hold fewer bound states. (Make a clear connection between the width of the well and the height of the walls).

Under what circumstance does the integral x0xbdxdiverge? Use this to argue that a physically acceptable wave function must fall to 0 faster than|x|1/2 does as xgets large.

We learned that to be normalizable, a wave function must not itself diverge and must fall to 0 faster than |x|-1/2as x get large. Nevertheless. We find two functions that slightly violate these requirements very useful. Consider the quantum mechanical plane wave Aei(kx-ax)and the weird functionΨx0(x)pictured which we here call by its proper name. the Dirac delta function.

(a) Which of the two normalizability requirements is violated by the plane wave, and which by Dirac delta function?

(b) Normalization of the plane wave could be accomplished if it were simply truncated, restricted to the region -b<x<+bbeing identically 0 outside. What would then be the relationship between b and A, and what would happen to A as b approaches infinity?

(c) Rather than an infinitely tall and narrow spike like the Dirac delta function. Consider a function that is 0 everywhere except the narrow region-E<x<+ where its value is a constant B. This too could be normalized, What would be the relationship between s and B, and what would happen to B as s approaches 0? (What we get is not exactly the Dirac delta function, but the distinction involves comparing infinities, a dangerous business that we will avoid.)

(d) As we see, the two "exceptional" functions may be viewed as limits of normalizable ones. In those limits, they are also complementary to each other in terms of their position and momentum uncertainties. Without getting into calculations, describe how they are complementary.

An electron istrapped in a finite well. How "far" (in eV) is it from being free if the penetration length of its wave function into the classically forbidden region 1nm?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free