Chapter 5: Q27E (page 187)
Where would a particle in the first excited state (first above ground) of an infinite well most likely be found?
Short Answer
A particle in the first excited state of an infinite well most likely be found at .
Chapter 5: Q27E (page 187)
Where would a particle in the first excited state (first above ground) of an infinite well most likely be found?
A particle in the first excited state of an infinite well most likely be found at .
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeEquation (5 - 16) gives infinite well energies. Because equation (5 - 22) cannot be solved in closed form, there is no similar compact formula for finite well energies. Still many conclusions can be drawn without one. Argue on largely qualitative grounds that if the walls of a finite well are moved close together but not changed in height, then the well must progressively hold fewer bound states. (Make a clear connection between the width of the well and the height of the walls.)
Equation gives infinite well energies. Because equation cannot be solved in closed form, there is no similar compact formula for finite well energies. Still many conclusions can be drawn without one. Argue on largely qualitative grounds that if the walls of a finite well are moved close together but not changed in height, then the well must progressively hold fewer bound states. (Make a clear connection between the width of the well and the height of the walls).
Under what circumstance does the integral diverge? Use this to argue that a physically acceptable wave function must fall to 0 faster than does as gets large.
We learned that to be normalizable, a wave function must not itself diverge and must fall to 0 faster than as x get large. Nevertheless. We find two functions that slightly violate these requirements very useful. Consider the quantum mechanical plane wave Aei(kx-ax)and the weird functionpictured which we here call by its proper name. the Dirac delta function.
(a) Which of the two normalizability requirements is violated by the plane wave, and which by Dirac delta function?
(b) Normalization of the plane wave could be accomplished if it were simply truncated, restricted to the region -b<x<+bbeing identically 0 outside. What would then be the relationship between b and A, and what would happen to A as b approaches infinity?
(c) Rather than an infinitely tall and narrow spike like the Dirac delta function. Consider a function that is 0 everywhere except the narrow region where its value is a constant B. This too could be normalized, What would be the relationship between s and B, and what would happen to B as s approaches 0? (What we get is not exactly the Dirac delta function, but the distinction involves comparing infinities, a dangerous business that we will avoid.)
(d) As we see, the two "exceptional" functions may be viewed as limits of normalizable ones. In those limits, they are also complementary to each other in terms of their position and momentum uncertainties. Without getting into calculations, describe how they are complementary.
An electron istrapped in a finite well. How "far" (in eV) is it from being free if the penetration length of its wave function into the classically forbidden region ?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.