What is the probability that a particle in the first excited (n=2) state of an infinite well would be found in the nuddle third of the well? How does this compare with the classical expectation? Why?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The required probability to find the particle in the middle third of the first excited state in the infinite well is 0.196. It is one-third if classically interpreted and the probability is a low value as the specified region is centered on a node.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Probability to be found in the middle third of the well. That is, between a/3and 2a/3as per the Figure 2.

Consider the infinite potential well given below (Figure localid="1657602770659" 1).

localid="1657602788132" V(x)={0, if localid="1657602793033" 0£x£aotherwise

Figure 1: Infinite potential well and width are ‘a’.

Figure 2: First excited state when n=2

02

Formula used

The solutions are given for an infinite well as:

Ψn(x)=2asin(nπax)

For n=2

Ψ2(x)=2asin(2πax)

Then, the probability of finding the particle could be determined from the below formula:

P=|2asin(2πax)|2dx

03

Calculation

P=|2asin(2πax)|2dx

Let 2

Then, apply the limits a/3and 2a/3substitute:

P=2aa/32a/3sin2kxdx

Integrating the right-hand side, and simplifying:

P=2aa/32a/3(1-cos2kx)2dx

P=2aa/32a/3dx2-a/32a/3cos2kx2dx

We can take $1 / 2$ outside and divide the 2 outside curly brackets.

P=1aa/32a/3dx-a/32a/3cos2kxdx

Now integrate and apply upper and lower limits:

sin8π3=sin(480π)=sin(360π+120Ω)=sin(120Z)

P=1a{[x]a/32a/3-[sin2kx2k]a/32a/3}

Now substitute and simplify:

P=1a{[2a3-a3]-[sin4πa×4πa]a/32a/3}

P={13-[sin8π3-sin4π34π]}

Here, Substituting the values and simplifying we will get

P={13-[sin8π3-sin4π34π]}=[13-0.137]=0.196

P=0.196

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A half-infinite well has an infinitely high wall at the origin and one of finite height U0 at x= L . Like the finite well, the number of allowed states is limited. Assume that it has two states, of energy E1 and E2 , where E2 is not much below U0. Make a sketch of the potential energy, then add plausible sketches of the two allowed wave functions on separate horizontal axes whose heights are E1 and E2 .

The quantized energy levels in the infinite well get further apart as n increases, but in the harmonic oscillator they are equally spaced.

  1. Explain the difference by considering the distance “between the walls” in each case and how it depends on the particles energy
  2. A very important bound system, the hydrogen atom, has energy levels that actually get closer together as n increases. How do you think the separation between the potential energy “walls” in this system varies relative to the other two? Explain.

Calculate the uncertainty in the particle’s position.

A finite well always has at least one bound state. Why does the argument of Exercises 38 fail in the case of a finite well?

In Section 5.5, it was shown that the infinite well energies follow simply fromλ=hp the formula for kinetic energy, p2/2m; and a famous standing-wave condition, λ=2L/N. The arguments are perfectly valid when the potential energy is 0(inside the well) and L is strictly constant, but they can also be useful in other cases. The length L allowed the wave should be roughly the distance between the classical turning points, where there is no kinetic energy left. Apply these arguments to the oscillator potential energy, U(x)=12kx2.Find the location x of the classical turning point in terms of E; use twice this distance for L; then insert this into the infinite well energy formula, so that appears on both sides. Thus far, the procedure really only deals with kinetic energy. Assume, as is true for a classical oscillator, that there is as much potential energy, on average, as kinetic energy. What do you obtain for the quantized energies?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free