Chapter 5: Q31E (page 188)
Verify that solution (5-19) satisfies the Schrodinger equation in form (5.18).
Short Answer
The solution of the Schrodinger equation is
Chapter 5: Q31E (page 188)
Verify that solution (5-19) satisfies the Schrodinger equation in form (5.18).
The solution of the Schrodinger equation is
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeWhat is the probability that a particle in the first excited state of an infinite well would be found in the nuddle third of the well? How does this compare with the classical expectation? Why?
A study of classical waves tells us that a standing wave can be expressed as a sum of two travelling waves. Quantum-Mechanical travelling waves, discussed in Chapter 4, is of the form . Show that the infinite well’s standing wave function can be expressed as a sum of two traveling waves.
Sketch the wave function. Is it smooth?
Consider a particle bound in a infinite well, where the potential inside is not constant but a linearly varying function. Suppose the particle is in a fairly high energy state, so that its wave function stretches across the entire well; that is isn’t caught in the “low spot”. Decide how ,if at all, its wavelength should vary. Then sketch a plausible wave function.
It is possible to take the finite well wave functions further than (21) without approximation, eliminating all but one normalization constant . First, use the continuity/smoothness conditions to eliminate , , and in favor of in (21). Then make the change of variables and use the trigonometric relations
and
on the
functions in region I, . The change of variables shifts the problem so that it is symmetric about , which requires that the probability density be symmetric and thus that be either an odd or even function of . By comparing the region II and region III functions, argue that this in turn demands that must be either +1 (even) or -1 (odd). Next, show that these conditions can be expressed, respectively, as and . Finally, plug these separately back into the region I solutions and show that
or
Note that is now a standard multiplicative normalization constant. Setting the integral of over all space to 1 would give it in terms of and , but because we can’t solve (22) exactly for k(or E), neither can we obtain an exact value for .
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.