A 50 electron is trapped between electrostatic walls 200eV high. How far does its wave function extend beyond the walls?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Electron wave extent beyond the walls δ=1.59×10-11m.

Step by step solution

01

Wave function

Know that, how far the wave function goes beyond the boundaries of the room so utilise the depth of penetration equation.

δ=h2m(uo-E)...................(1)

Known values are,

E = 50 ev,

Uo= 200eV.

02

The electron wave beyond the wall.

From the electron volt to joule to convert E and Uo

Multiply by them 1.60218x10-19 then E = 8.0109x10-18 joule and Uo= 3.204x10-17 joule.

Substitute (1) into,

δ=1.0545×10-342×9.1093×10-31×3.204×10-17-8.0109×10-18δ=1.59×10-11m

So, the electron wave beyond the wall is δ=1.59×10-11m.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A particle is described by the wave function

ψ(x)=2/Πx2-x+1.25

(a) Show that the normalization constant2/Πis correct.

(b) A measurement of the position of the particle is to be made. At what location is it most probable that the particle would be found?

(c) What is the probability per unit length of finding the particle at this location?

Show thatΔp=0p^ψ(x)=p¯ψ(x) that is, verify that unless the wave function is an Eigen function of the momentum operator, there will be a nonzero uncertainty in the momentumstarts with showing that the quantity

allspaceψ(x)(p^p¯)2ψ(x)dx

Is (Δp)2. Then using the differential operator form ofp^and integration by parts, show that it is also,

allspace{(p^p¯)ψ(x)}{(p^p¯)ψ(x)}dx

Together these show that ifΔpis. 0. then the preceding quantity must be 0. However, the Integral of the complex square of a function(the quantity in the brackets) can only be 0 if the function is identically 0, so the assertion is proved.

A tiny1μg particle is in a 1 cm wide enclosure and take a yearto bounce from one end to the other and back(a) Haw many nodes are there in the enclosure (b) How would your answer change if the particle were more massive or moving faster.

Simple models are very useful. Consider the twin finite wells shown in the figure, at First with a tiny separation. Then with increasingly distant separations, In all case, the four lowest allowed wave functions are planned on axes proportional to their energies. We see that they pass through the classically forbidden region between the wells, and we also see a trend. When the wells are very close, the four functions and energies are what we might expect of a single finite well, but as they move apart, pairs of functions converge to intermediate energies.

(a) The energies of the second and fourth states decrease. Based on changing wavelength alone, argue that is reasonable.

(b) The energies of the first and third states increase. Why? (Hint: Study bow the behaviour required in the classically forbidden region affects these two relative to the others.)

(c) The distant wells case might represent two distant atoms. If each atom had one electron, what advantage is there in bringing the atoms closer to form a molecule? (Note: Two electrons can have the same wave function.)

A finite well always has at least one bound state. Why does the argument of Exercises 38 fail in the case of a finite well?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free