Whereas an infinite well has an infinite number of bound states, a finite well does not. By relating the well heightU0 to the kinetic energy and the kinetic energy (through λ) to n and L. Show that the number of bound states is given roughly by8ml2U0/h2 (Assume that the number is large.)

Short Answer

Expert verified

Hence, the number of bound states is given bynmax8U0mL2h2 is proved

Step by step solution

01

Assumption

We assume that the wave function and energies correspond to the infinite well.

If,E<U0 then inside the well, the energy is totally kinetic and is given by,

h2k22m=n2π2h22mL2

02

Calculation

The highest bound state exists whenE=U0. i.e., the differenceEU00. For this state,

nmax2π2h22mL2U0nmax8U0mL2h2

Hence the number of bounded states nmax8U0mL2h2is proved.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Verify that solution (5-19) satisfies the Schrodinger equation in form (5.18).

It is possible to take the finite well wave functions further than (21) without approximation, eliminating all but one normalization constant C . First, use the continuity/smoothness conditions to eliminate A, B , andG in favor of Cin (21). Then make the change of variables z=x-L/2 and use the trigonometric relations

sin(a+b)=sinacosb+cosasinband

cos(a+b)=cosacosb-sinasinbon the

functions in region I, -L/2<z<L/2. The change of variables shifts the problem so that it is symmetric about z=0, which requires that the probability density be symmetric and thus that ψ(z)be either an odd or even function of z. By comparing the region II and region III functions, argue that this in turn demands that (α/k)sinkL+coskL must be either +1 (even) or -1 (odd). Next, show that these conditions can be expressed, respectively, as αk=tankL2 and αk=-cotkL2. Finally, plug these separately back into the region I solutions and show that

ψ(z)=C×{eα(z+L/2)          z<L/2coskzcoskL2          -L/2<z<L/2e-α(z-L/2)          z>L/2


or

ψ(z)=C×{eα(z+L/2)          z<L/2-sinkzsinkL2          -L/2<z<L/2e-α(z-L/2)          z>L/2

Note that Cis now a standard multiplicative normalization constant. Setting the integral of |ψ(z)|2 over all space to 1 would give it in terms of kand α , but because we can’t solve (22) exactly for k(or E), neither can we obtain an exact value for C.

The harmonic oscillator potential energy is proportional to x2, and the energy levels are equally spaced:

En(n+12). The energy levels in the infinite well become farther apart as energy increases: Enn2.Because the functionlimb|x/L|bis 0 for|x|<Land infinitely large for|x|>L. the infinite well potential energy may be thought of as proportional to |x|.

How would you expect energy levels to be spaced in a potential well that is (a) proportional to |x|1and (b) proportional to -|x|-1? For the harmonic oscillator and infinite well. the number of bound-state energies is infinite, and arbitrarily large bound-state energies are possible. Are these characteristics shared (c) by the |x|1well and (d) by the-|x|-1well? V

A classical particle confined to the positive x-axis experiences a force whose potential energy is-

U(x)=1x2-2x+1

a) By finding its minimum value and determining its behaviors at x=0and role="math" localid="1660119698069" x=, sketch this potential energy.

b) Suppose the particle has energy of 0.5J. Find any turning points. Would the particle be bound?

c) Suppose the particle has the energy of 2.0J. Find any turning points. Would the particle be bound?

Figure 5.15 shows that the allowed wave functions for a finite well whose depth U0was chosen to be6π2/mL2.

(a) Insert this value in equation (5-23), then using a calculator or computer, solve for the allowed value of kL, of which there are four.

(b) Usingk=2mEfind corresponding values of E. Do they appear to agree with figure 5.15?

(c) Show that the chosenU0implies that α12π2L2k2.

(d) DefiningLandCto be 1 for convenience, plug your KLand αvalues into the wave function given in exercise 46, then plot the results. ( Note: Your first and third KLvalues should correspond to even function of z, thus using the form withCOSKZ, while the second and forth correspond to odd functions. Do the plots also agree with Figure 5.15?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free