Consider the delta well potential energy:

U(x)={0x0-x=0

Although not completely realistic, this potential energy is often a convenient approximation to a verystrong, verynarrow attractive potential energy well. It has only one allowed bound-state wave function, and because the top of the well is defined as U = 0, the corresponding bound-state energy is negative. Call its value -E0.

(a) Applying the usual arguments and required continuity conditions (need it be smooth?), show that the wave function is given by

ψ(x)=(2mE0h2)1/4e-(2mE0/)|x|

(b) Sketch ψ(x)and U(x) on the same diagram. Does this wave function exhibit the expected behavior in the classically forbidden region?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) It is verified that the wave function for the delta well potential is given by ψ(x)=2mE0214e(2mE0/)|x|

(b) The plot of the wave function is given below. It exhibits expected behavior in the classically forbidden region.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1: Given data

There is a delta well potential of the form

U(x)=0x0x=0....................................(I)

The top of the well is defined as U = 0 and the corresponding bound-state energy is negative (-E0).

02

Wave function outside a finite potential well

The wave function of a particle of mass m and energy E outside a finite potential well of height U0 is

ψx=Ae2mU0-Exx<0Be-2mU0-Exx>0 .....(II)

Here is the reduced Planck's constant.

03

 Step 3: Determining the wave function for the delta well potential

For the delta potential, U0= 0 and E =-Eand the wave function in equation (II) reduces to

localid="1660047013782" ψx=Ae2mU0-Exx<0Be-2mU0-Exx>0

The function has to be continuous at x = 0 and thus

A = B

The function thus becomes

localid="1660047017169" ψx=Ae-2mE0x

Normalize this to get

localid="1660047021009" 1=-Ae-2mE0x2dx=2A20e-22mE0xdx

Let

localid="1660047024841" 22mE0x=zdx=22mE0dz

Thus

localid="1660047032303" 1=2A222mE00e-zdz=A22mE0A=2mE01/2

The final wave function is

localid="1660047039951" ψx=2mE01/2e-2mE0x

04

Plotting the wave function

The wave function obtained above is plotted as follows

The wave function exponentially falls off in the classically forbidden region as expected.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

To determine the two bound state energies for the well.

The uncertainty in a particle's momentum in an infinite well in the general case of arbitrary nis given bynπhL .

We learned that to be normalizable, a wave function must not itself diverge and must fall to 0 faster than |x|-1/2as x get large. Nevertheless. We find two functions that slightly violate these requirements very useful. Consider the quantum mechanical plane wave Aei(kx-ax)and the weird functionΨx0(x)pictured which we here call by its proper name. the Dirac delta function.

(a) Which of the two normalizability requirements is violated by the plane wave, and which by Dirac delta function?

(b) Normalization of the plane wave could be accomplished if it were simply truncated, restricted to the region -b<x<+bbeing identically 0 outside. What would then be the relationship between b and A, and what would happen to A as b approaches infinity?

(c) Rather than an infinitely tall and narrow spike like the Dirac delta function. Consider a function that is 0 everywhere except the narrow region-E<x<+ where its value is a constant B. This too could be normalized, What would be the relationship between s and B, and what would happen to B as s approaches 0? (What we get is not exactly the Dirac delta function, but the distinction involves comparing infinities, a dangerous business that we will avoid.)

(d) As we see, the two "exceptional" functions may be viewed as limits of normalizable ones. In those limits, they are also complementary to each other in terms of their position and momentum uncertainties. Without getting into calculations, describe how they are complementary.

a) Taking the particle’s total energy to be 0, find the potential energy.

(b) On the same axes, sketch the wave function and the potential energy.

(c) To what region would the particle be restricted classically?

What is the product ofΔxandΔp(obtained in Exercise 83 and 85)? How does it compare with the minimum theoretically possible? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free