Figure 5.15 shows that the allowed wave functions for a finite well whose depth U0was chosen to be6π2/mL2.

(a) Insert this value in equation (5-23), then using a calculator or computer, solve for the allowed value of kL, of which there are four.

(b) Usingk=2mEfind corresponding values of E. Do they appear to agree with figure 5.15?

(c) Show that the chosenU0implies that α12π2L2k2.

(d) DefiningLandCto be 1 for convenience, plug your KLand αvalues into the wave function given in exercise 46, then plot the results. ( Note: Your first and third KLvalues should correspond to even function of z, thus using the form withCOSKZ, while the second and forth correspond to odd functions. Do the plots also agree with Figure 5.15?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a) The allowed values KLare 2.650, 7.821,5.272, and 10.159.

b) The expression for energy is E=k222m, and yes, it agrees with figure 5.15.

c) It is proved that α=12π2L2k2.

d)

yes, they agree with figure 5.15.

Step by step solution

01

Given data

The allowed wave functions for a finite well whose depth can be expressed as,

U0=6π22mL2 (1)

02

The concepts and formula used to solve the given problem

The equation of potential energy can be written as,

U0={2k22msec2kL22k22mcsc2kL2 (2)

Here, U0is the potential energy,Kis energy constant,is reduced Planck's constant,mis the mass, andLis the depth of the well.

03

 a) Allowed values of KL

Substitute the values in the equation (2), and we get,

Part 1.

6π22mL2=2k22msec2kL212π2k2L2=sec2kL2kLseckL2=12π

When we use the calculator to solve the above equation, we find the values as,

kL=2.650,3.868,7.821

But 3.868 lies within (π,2π), which fails the condition.

Part 2.

6π22mL2=2k22mcsc2kL212π2k2L2=csc2kL2kLcsckL2=12π

When we use the calculator to solve the above equation, we find the values as,

kL=5.272,7.911,10.159

But 7.911 lies within (2π,3π), which fails the condition.

Therefore, the allowed values KLare 2.650, 7.821, 5.272, and 10.159.

04

(b) The concepts and formula used to solve the given problem

The expression forKis given as,

k=2mE

Here, kis energy constant, Eis the energy.

Rearrange the above expression for E, and we get,

k2=2mE2E=k222m

To compare it to figure 5.15, we can modify it as,

E=k22L26π22×6π2mL2E=6π22mL2(kL)212π2

Substitute the values in the above equation from equation 1, and we get,

E=U0(kL)212π2

This expression is the fraction of the total well depth.

Thus, the expression for energy is E=k222m, and yes, it agrees with figure 5.15.

05

c ) Show that  α≃12π2L2−k2

The expression for the value of αcan be written as,

α=2m(U0E)2 …… (3)

Here,α is the energy constant.

Substitute the values in the above equation, and we get,

α=2m6π22mL2k222m2α=12π2L2k2

Therefore, It is proved thatα=12π2L2k2

06

d ) Plots

The plots are given below as,

Yes, they agree with figure 5.15.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the wave function that is a combination of two different infinite well stationary states the nth and the mth

ψx,t=12ψnxe-iEn/t+12ψme-iEm/t

  1. Show that the ψx,tis properly normalized.
  2. Show that the expectation value of the energy is the average of the two energies:E¯=12En+Em
  3. Show that the expectation value of the square of the energy is given by .
  4. Determine the uncertainty in the energy.

A bound particle of massdescribed by the wave function

ψ(x)=Axe-x2/2b2

What is the most probable location at which to find the particle?

Quantization is an important characteristic of systems in which a particle is bound in a small region. Why "small," and why "bound"?

Show thatΔp=0p^ψ(x)=p¯ψ(x) that is, verify that unless the wave function is an Eigen function of the momentum operator, there will be a nonzero uncertainty in the momentumstarts with showing that the quantity

allspaceψ(x)(p^p¯)2ψ(x)dx

Is (Δp)2. Then using the differential operator form ofp^and integration by parts, show that it is also,

allspace{(p^p¯)ψ(x)}{(p^p¯)ψ(x)}dx

Together these show that ifΔpis. 0. then the preceding quantity must be 0. However, the Integral of the complex square of a function(the quantity in the brackets) can only be 0 if the function is identically 0, so the assertion is proved.

The harmonic oscillator potential energy is proportional to x2, and the energy levels are equally spaced:

En(n+12). The energy levels in the infinite well become farther apart as energy increases: Enn2.Because the functionlimb|x/L|bis 0 for|x|<Land infinitely large for|x|>L. the infinite well potential energy may be thought of as proportional to |x|.

How would you expect energy levels to be spaced in a potential well that is (a) proportional to |x|1and (b) proportional to -|x|-1? For the harmonic oscillator and infinite well. the number of bound-state energies is infinite, and arbitrarily large bound-state energies are possible. Are these characteristics shared (c) by the |x|1well and (d) by the-|x|-1well? V

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free