In a study of heat transfer, we find that for a solid rod, there is a relationship between the second derivative of the temperature with respect to position along the rod and the first with respect to time. (A linear temperature change with position would imply as much heat flowing into a region as out. so the temperature there would not change with time).

2T(x,τ)x2=βT(x,τ)τδx

(a) Separate variables this assume a solution that is a product of a function of xand a function of tplug it in then divide by it, obtain two ordinary differential equations.

(b) consider a fairly simple, if somewhat unrealistic case suppose the temperature is 0 atx=0and, and x=1 positive in between, write down the simplest function of xthat (1) fits these conditions and (2) obey the differential equation involving x.Does your choice determine the value, including sign of some constant ?

(c) Obtain the fullT(x,t)for this case.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) Two differential equations are T(x,t) =Aexp( -ax)expa2tb.

(b) Yes x = A is some constant.

(c) Temperature is constant throughout the rod.

Step by step solution

01

Formula for Heat Equation.

We know that:

In a study of heat transfer, we find that for a solid rod, there is a relationship between the second derivative of the temperature with respect to position along the rod and the first with respect to time.

Heat equation:

2T(x,t)x2=bT(x,t)t

02

Separating the Variables

Let

T(x,t) =X(x).T(t)=T2Xx2=bXTt=1X2Xx2=bTTt=a2

Then

03

Assigning the Value

Then 1X2Xx2=a2and bTTt=a2

2Xx2-a2X= 0And 1TTt=a2b

X=Ae-ax+BeaxAnd TT=a2bt

X=Ae-ax+BeaxAnd lnT=a2tb

Asxso B = 0X = Ae- ax and T=expa2tb

Therefore .T(x,t) =Aexp( -ax)expa2tb

04

Finding X as Constant.

Suppose at x= 0&x=LT= 0Then

T(0,t) =T(L,t) =Aexpa2tb=Aexp( -aL)expa2tbexp( -aL) = 1a= 0

So X = A

Therefore, X=A is some constant.

05

Full Temperature

For this case T(x,t) =A , temperature is also constant throughout the rod.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Quantum-mechanical stationary states are of the general form Ψ(x,t)=ψ(x)e-iωt. For the basic plane wave (Chapter 4), this is Ψ(x,t)=Aeikxe-iωt=Aei(kx-ωt), and for a particle in a box it is Asinkxe-iωt. Although both are sinusoidal, we claim that the plane wave alone is the prototype function whose momentum is pure-a well-defined value in one direction. Reinforcing the claim is the fact that the plane wave alone lacks features that we expect to see only when, effectively, waves are moving in both directions. What features are these, and, considering the probability densities, are they indeed present for a particle in a box and absent for a plane wave?

Advance an argument based on p=hλthat there is no bound state in a half-infinite well unless U0is at leasth232mL2. (Hint: What is the maximum wavelength possible within the well?)

The deeper the finite well, the more state it holds. In fact, a new state, the, is added when the well’s depthU0reachesh2(n1)2/8mL2. (a) Argue that this should be the case based only onk=2mE/h2, the shape of the wave inside, and the degree of penetration of the classically forbidden region expected for a state whose energy E is only negligibly belowU0. (b) How many states would be found up to this same “height” in an infinite well.

Obtain expression (5-23) from equation (5-22). Using cosθ=cos2(12θ)sin2(12θ)andsinθ=2sin(12θ)cos(12θ), first convert the argument of the cotangent fromkLto12kL. Next, put the resulting equation in quadratic form, and then factor. Note thatαis positive by definition.

A study of classical waves tells us that a standing wave can be expressed as a sum of two travelling waves. Quantum-Mechanical travelling waves, discussed in Chapter 4, is of the form ψ(x,t)=Aei(kx=ωt). Show that the infinite well’s standing wave function can be expressed as a sum of two traveling waves.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free