Chapter 5: Q80CE (page 193)
Determine the particle’s most probable position.
Short Answer
The most probable position for the particle with the given wave function is .
Chapter 5: Q80CE (page 193)
Determine the particle’s most probable position.
The most probable position for the particle with the given wave function is .
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeIn Section 5.5, it was shown that the infinite well energies follow simply from the formula for kinetic energy, p2/2m; and a famous standing-wave condition, . The arguments are perfectly valid when the potential energy is 0(inside the well) and L is strictly constant, but they can also be useful in other cases. The length L allowed the wave should be roughly the distance between the classical turning points, where there is no kinetic energy left. Apply these arguments to the oscillator potential energy, .Find the location x of the classical turning point in terms of E; use twice this distance for L; then insert this into the infinite well energy formula, so that appears on both sides. Thus far, the procedure really only deals with kinetic energy. Assume, as is true for a classical oscillator, that there is as much potential energy, on average, as kinetic energy. What do you obtain for the quantized energies?
To determine the classical expectation value of the position of a particle in a box is , the expectation value of the square of the position of a particle in a box isrole="math" localid="1658324625272" , and the uncertainty in the position of a particle in a box is .
Quantum-mechanical stationary states are of the general form . For the basic plane wave (Chapter 4), this is , and for a particle in a box it is . Although both are sinusoidal, we claim that the plane wave alone is the prototype function whose momentum is pure-a well-defined value in one direction. Reinforcing the claim is the fact that the plane wave alone lacks features that we expect to see only when, effectively, waves are moving in both directions. What features are these, and, considering the probability densities, are they indeed present for a particle in a box and absent for a plane wave?
Consider a particle of mass mand energy E in a region where the potential energy is constant U0. Greater than E and the region extends to
(a) Guess a physically acceptable solution of the Schrodinger equation in this region and demonstrate that it is solution,
(b) The region noted in part extends from x = + 1 nm to . To the left of x = 1nm. The particle’s wave function is Dcos (109m-1 x). Is also greater than Ehere?
(c) The particle’s mass m is 10-3 kg. By how much (in eV) doesthe potential energy prevailing from x=1 nm to U0. Exceed the particle’s energy?
Question: the operator for angular momentum about the z-axis in spherical polar coordinate is .find the function that would have a well-defined z-component of angular momentum.
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.