Chapter 5: Q84CE (page 193)
Determine the expectation value of the momentum of the particle. Explain.
Short Answer
The expected value of momentum is .
Chapter 5: Q84CE (page 193)
Determine the expectation value of the momentum of the particle. Explain.
The expected value of momentum is .
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeWhen is the temporal part of the wave function 0 ? Why is this important?
The harmonic oscillator potential energy is proportional to , and the energy levels are equally spaced:
. The energy levels in the infinite well become farther apart as energy increases: .Because the functionis 0 forand infinitely large for. the infinite well potential energy may be thought of as proportional to .
How would you expect energy levels to be spaced in a potential well that is (a) proportional to and (b) proportional to ? For the harmonic oscillator and infinite well. the number of bound-state energies is infinite, and arbitrarily large bound-state energies are possible. Are these characteristics shared (c) by the well and (d) by thewell? V
To determine the classical expectation value of the position of a particle in a box is , the expectation value of the square of the position of a particle in a box isrole="math" localid="1658324625272" , and the uncertainty in the position of a particle in a box is .
For the harmonic oscillator potential energy, , the ground-state wave function is , and its energy is .
(a) Find the classical turning points for a particle with this energy.
(b) The Schrödinger equation says that and its second derivative should be of the opposite sign when E > Uand of the same sign when E < U . These two regions are divided by the classical turning points. Verify the relationship between and its second derivative for the ground-state oscillator wave function.
(Hint:Look for the inflection points.)
The term interaction is sometimes used interchangeably with force, and other times interchangeably with potential energy. Although force and potential energy certainly aren't the same thing, what justification is there for using the same term to cover both?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.