A lead nucleus at rest is roughly 10-14min diameter. If moving through the laboratory with a kinetic energy of 600 TeV, howthick would thenucleus be in the direction of motion?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The thickness of the lead nucleus in the moving direction is 3.2×10-18m

Step by step solution

01

Given data

Kinetic energy is, 600TeV.

02

Concept of rest energy

A lead nucleus has mass = 207.2u

Thus, the rest energy can be calculated as,

mc2=(207.2u)c2

03

Step 3:Determine the rest energy

A lead nucleus has mass = 207.2u

Thus, the rest energy can be calculated as shown below:

mc2=(207.2u)c2=207.2uc2931.5MeVuc2=0.193×106MeV=0.193×106MeV106eV1MeV

Convert MeVto TeV as:

mc2=0.193×1012eV1TeV1012MeV=0.193TeV

04

Determine the kinetic energy lead nucleus

The kinetic energy lead nucleus can be expressed as,

KE=(γ-1)mc2

Here, Y is the relativistic constant.

Re-arrange the equation for Y as,

γ=KEmc2+1

Substitute 0.193TeV for mc2 and 600TeV for KE , and we get,

γ=600TeV0.193TeV+1=3.1×103

05

Determine the thickness of the lead nucleus in the moving direction

Thus, the length in the moving direction can be expressed as:

l=l'γ

Here l is the thickness of the lead nucleus when it rest.

Substitute 10-14ml for and 3.1×103 for Y as shown below.

l'=10-14m3.1×103=3.2×10-18m

The thickness of the lead nucleus in the moving direction is 3.2×10-18m.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Equation (12·5) would apply to any given chunk of an expanding spherical mass. provided that no chunks overtake any others-if, for instance,speed increases, with distance from the origin. Why? (Think of Gauss’­ law from electrostatics).

Equation (12-7) assumes a matter-dominated universe in which the energy density of radiation is insignificant. This situation prevails today and has to do with the different rates at which the densities of matter and radiation vary with the size of the universe. Matter density is simply inversely proportional to the volume, obeying ρmIR3 , whereρm is the matter density now. Radiation density, however, would be proportional to I/R4(Not only does the volume increase, but also all wavelengths are stretched in proportion to R. lowering the energy density by the extra factor.) This density drops faster As the universe grows, but it also grows more quickly in the backward time direction. In other words, long ago, the universe would have been radiation dominated. Show that if the function used for matter density in equation (12-7) is replaced by one appropriate to radiation, but retaining the assumption that K' andΩA are both 0, then the scale factor Rwould grow ast1/2

Sketch the Feynman diagram if theproposed decay is possible.

τ+e++ve+vτ

For solutions of Klein-Gordon equation, the quantity,

iψtψiψtψis interpreted as charge density. Show that for a positive-energy plane-wavesolution. It is a real constant, and for negative-energy solution.It is a negative of that constant.

To show that the Klein-Gordon equation has valid solutions for negative values of E, verify that equation (12-4) is satisfied by a wave function of the form .ψ(x,t)=Ae±ipx/±iEt/

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free