The increase in potential energy as two atoms in a diatomic molecule get closer is partly due to the core electrons being forced by the exclusion principle to higher energies. Can you argue why the residual strong force should have a “hard core”.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Since the residual strong force is the sum of the electromagnetic force and the strong force, it will behave the same.In other words, it has a 'hard core'.

Step by step solution

01

Given data

The strong force has a short range, and within this range, the force is almost constant.

02

Definition of Inverse Square Law

This law describeshow intense the light will be with respect to the distance of the source.

It states thatthe intensity of the light will be inversely proportional to the square of the distance.

03

Explain if residual strong force should have a hard core 

The strong force has a short range, and within this range, the force is almost constant.

In contrast, the electromagnetic force follows the inverse square law.

This means there is a limit to how close two protons can get together.If they are too close, the repulsive electromagnetic force is going to be bigger than the strong force, and the two nucleons will separate again.

Since the residual strong force is the sum of the electromagnetic force and the strong force, it will behave the same.

In other words, it has a 'hard core'.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sketch the Feynman diagram if theproposed decay is possible.

τ+e++ve+vτ

Explain to your friend who has just completed a study of classical electromagnetism, the term field Quantum.

To show,

(a) Ψ1(x,t)=Aeikxiωtis the solution of both Klein-Gordon and the Schrodinger equations.

(b) Ψ2(x,t)=Aeikxcosωtis the solution of both Klein-Gordon but not the Schrodinger equations.

(c) TheΨ2 is a combination of positive and negative energy solutions of the Klein-Gordon equation.

(d) To compare the time dependence ofΨ2 for Ψ1and Ψ2.

Equation (12-7) assumes a matter-dominated universe in which the energy density of radiation is insignificant. This situation prevails today and has to do with the different rates at which the densities of matter and radiation vary with the size of the universe. Matter density is simply inversely proportional to the volume, obeying ρmIR3 , whereρm is the matter density now. Radiation density, however, would be proportional to I/R4(Not only does the volume increase, but also all wavelengths are stretched in proportion to R. lowering the energy density by the extra factor.) This density drops faster As the universe grows, but it also grows more quickly in the backward time direction. In other words, long ago, the universe would have been radiation dominated. Show that if the function used for matter density in equation (12-7) is replaced by one appropriate to radiation, but retaining the assumption that K' andΩA are both 0, then the scale factor Rwould grow ast1/2

Approximately what energy would electrons need to have to be useful as probes that could reveal features as small as 10-18m,the approximate range of the weak force?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free