If a neutrino interacted with a quark every time their separation was within the 1018 m range generally accepted for the weak force, then the cross-section of a neutron or proton “seen” by a neutrino would be on the order of 1036 m2. Even at such separation, however the probability of interactions is quite small. The nucleon appears to have an effective cross-section of only about 1048 m2.

(a) About how many nucleons are there in a column through the earth’s center of 1 m2 cross-sectional area?

(b) what is the probability that a given neutrino passing through space and encountering earth will actually “hit”?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The resultant answer is4×1037nucleons/m2.

(b) The probability is 4×1011.

Step by step solution

01

Given data

Cross-sectional area =1 m2.

02

Concept of Density

Density: mass of a unit volume of a material substance.

The formula for density is d=M/V ,

where d is density, M is mass, and V is volume.

Density is commonly expressed in units of grams per cubic centimeter.

03

Calculate the volume 

(a)

Substitute 5.98×1024kgfor MEand 6.37×106m for RE as:

ρE=(5.98×1024 kg)43π(6.37×106 m)3ρE=5.5×103 kg/m3

Thus, the density of Earth in 5.5×103kg/m3.

Now calculate the volume of this 1 square meter of the earth all across the center as:

(2RE)(1 m3)=2(6.37×106 m)(1 m2)(2RE)(1m3)=1.27×107 m3

Then let us calculate the mass of this bit of Earth, with Earth's density 5.5×103kg/m3 and assume all the mass is contributed by nucleons of mass 1.67×1027kg.

=1.28×107 m3×5.5×103 kg/m31.67×1027 kg=4×1037 nucleons/m2

Thus, there would be around 4×1037 nucleons/m2.

04

Simplify the expression

(b)

The probability is the multiple of effective area and number of nucleons can be calculated as:

=(4×1037)(1048)=4×1011

Thus, the probability is 4×1011.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What does color neutrality have to do with quark confinement?

Equation (12-7) assumes a matter-dominated universe in which the energy density of radiation is insignificant. This situation prevails today and has to do with the different rates at which the densities of matter and radiation vary with the size of the universe. Matter density is simply inversely proportional to the volume, obeying ρmIR3 , whereρm is the matter density now. Radiation density, however, would be proportional to I/R4(Not only does the volume increase, but also all wavelengths are stretched in proportion to R. lowering the energy density by the extra factor.) This density drops faster As the universe grows, but it also grows more quickly in the backward time direction. In other words, long ago, the universe would have been radiation dominated. Show that if the function used for matter density in equation (12-7) is replaced by one appropriate to radiation, but retaining the assumption that K' andΩA are both 0, then the scale factor Rwould grow ast1/2

For solutions of Klein-Gordon equation, the quantity,

iψtψiψtψis interpreted as charge density. Show that for a positive-energy plane-wavesolution. It is a real constant, and for negative-energy solution.It is a negative of that constant.

Suppose a force between two particles decreases distance according to F=k/rb. What is the limit on b if the energy required to separate the particlesInfinitely far is not to be infinite?

In non-relavistic quantum mechanics, governed by the Schrodinger equation, the probability of finding a particle does not change with time.

(a)

Prove it, Begin with the time derivative of the total probability

ddtΨ*(x,t)Ψ'(x,t)dx=(Ψ(x,t)tΨ*(x,t)+Ψ*(x,t)tΨ(x,t))dx

Then use the Schrodinger equation to eliminate the partial time derivatives, integrate by parts, and show that the result is zero. Assume that the particle is well localised, so that ψ and ψxare 0 when evaluated at .±

(b) Does this procedure lead to the same conclusion if Wave function obeyKlein-Gordon rather than Shrodinger equation? Why and why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free