You are a promising theoretical physicist who does not believe that gravity is a distinct fundamental force but is instead related to the other forces by an all-encompassing relativistic, quantum-mechanical theory. In particular, you do not believe that the universal gravitational constant G is really one of nature's elite set of fundamental constants. You believe that Gcan be derived from more-basic constants: the fundamental constant of quantum mechanics, Planck's constanth ; the fundamental speed limiting the propagation of any force, the speed of lightc ; and one other- a fundamental length l, important to the one unified force. Using simply dimensional analysis, find a formula for G, and then an order-of magnitude value for the fundamental length.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The gravitational constant can be expressed as G=c3l2h and the fundamental length should be around 4×1035m.

Step by step solution

01

Given data

Universal Gravitational constant G=6.67×1011Nm2/kg2.

Planck’s constant h=6.626×1034Js

Velocity of light C=3×108 m/s.

02

Concept of Universal gravitation constant

The units for universal gravitational constant Gare:

Nm2kg2=kgm/s2m2kg2=m3kgs2

03

Simplify the expression

So, by dimensional analysis, it is[G]=[L]3[M]1[T]2.

The units for Planck const is shown below:

Js=(Nm)sJs=((kgm/s2)m)sJs=kgm2/s

So, by dimensional analysis, it is [h]=[L]2[M]1[T]1.

The dimensional analysis of speed of light is [c]=[L]1[T]1.

The dimensional analysis of the fundamental length is [l]=[L]1.

So, obtain:

[G]=hxCyIz[G]=([L]2[M]1[T]1)x([L]1[T]1)yLZ[G]=L2X+y+ZMxT-x-y[G]=L3M-1T-2

The universal gravitational constant G in terms ofh is G=h1c3l2.

Rearrange above equation for I.

l=Ghc3

Substitute 6.67×1011Nm2/kg2 for role="math" localid="1660036687213" G,6.626×1034Js for h, and 3×108 m/s for c as:

l=(6.67×1011 Nm2/kg2)(6.626×1034Js)(3×108 m/s)3l=4×1035m

Thus, the fundamental length should be around4×1035m.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The increase in potential energy as two atoms in a diatomic molecule get closer is partly due to the core electrons being forced by the exclusion principle to higher energies. Can you argue why the residual strong force should have a “hard core”.

Sketch Feynman vertex for the annihilation of a b quark and u¯.

Exercises 23 and 24 give the threshold energies for which two particles of mass m can produce a given mass M in collidingbeam and stationary-target accelerator. Evaluate the two for a collision in which two protons become three protons and one antiproton. How much more energy is neededfor the stationary target?

For solutions of Klein-Gordon equation, the quantity,

iψtψiψtψis interpreted as charge density. Show that for a positive-energy plane-wavesolution. It is a real constant, and for negative-energy solution.It is a negative of that constant.

Equation (12-7) assumes a matter-dominated universe in which the energy density of radiation is insignificant. This situation prevails today and has to do with the different rates at which the densities of matter and radiation vary with the size of the universe. Matter density is simply inversely proportional to the volume, obeying ρmIR3 , whereρm is the matter density now. Radiation density, however, would be proportional to I/R4(Not only does the volume increase, but also all wavelengths are stretched in proportion to R. lowering the energy density by the extra factor.) This density drops faster As the universe grows, but it also grows more quickly in the backward time direction. In other words, long ago, the universe would have been radiation dominated. Show that if the function used for matter density in equation (12-7) is replaced by one appropriate to radiation, but retaining the assumption that K' andΩA are both 0, then the scale factor Rwould grow ast1/2

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free