Question:How is it that a high binding energy is a low energy?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer

The nucleus is harder to be broken apart, that is to say, the nucleus is more stable and at a lower energy state.

Step by step solution

01

Given data

The higher the binding energy is, the more energy it requires to pull the nucleons apart.

02

Definition of Binding Energy 

The energy needed to separate a nucleus into its component protons and neutrons is known as the binding energy.

03

Statement for solution 

Binding energy is the energy that is required to pull the nucleons of a nucleus all apart.

The higher the binding energy is, the more energy it requires to pull the nucleons apart.

This means the nucleus is harder to be broken apart, that is to say, the nucleus is more stable and at a lower energy state.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A fossil specimen has C14decay rate of5.0s-1

(a) How many carbon-14 nuclei are present?

(b) If the specimen is 20,000 years old, how many carbon-14 nuclei were present when the animal died?

(c) How much kinetic energy (in MeV) is released in each β-decay and what is the total amount released in all β-decay since the animal died?

You occupy a one-dimensional world in which beads of mass m0 when isolated-attract each other if and only if in contact. Were the beads to interact solely by this attraction, it would take energyH to break the contact. Consequently. We could extract this much energy by sticking two together. However, they also share a repulsive force, no matter what their separation. For which the potential energy isU(r)=0.85Ha/r . Whererole="math" localid="1660033271423" a is a bead's radius andr is centre to centre separation. The closer the beads. The higher is this energy.

(a) For one stationary bead, by how much does the energy differ fromm0c2?

(b) For two stationary beads in contact, by how much does the energy differ from 2m0c2?

(c) For three beads in contact (in a line, of course, since this world is one-dimensional). by how much does the energy differ from3m022 ?

(d) For four beads in contact, by how much does the energy differ from 4m0c2?

(e) If you had 12 isolated beads and wished to extract the most energy by sticking them together (in linear groupings), into sets of what number would you group them?

(f) Sets of what number would be suitable fuel for the release of fusion energy? Or fission energy?

The total kinetic energy carried by the products of the spontaneous fission of plutonium – 240 is typically about 180 MeV. Use this to argue there that reduction in Coulomb repulsion is the major impulse behind the process. Assume for simplicity that the two fragment nuclei are of equal Z.

Question: Explain 10 your perplexed friend how you can bring, together twelve objects of mass 1.01 and end up with one object of mass 12.00

By classical, hard sphere assumption, what smallest value of A would make one nucleon surrounded. Relate your answer with figure 11.14.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free